The World According To Damien
in a World gone mad – one sane voice emerges…


Atheism is merely the realisation that mythical beings do not control our lives – WE do. Most British people – and those of other advanced countries – are atheists.

However, this is not enough. ANTI-theism is the realisation that not only is much time, effort and money WASTED on religions – the concept itself is EVIL.

Consider the number of LIVES that have been lost to it – both in history and to this DAY.

Consider the ACCIDENTS caused by the belief that your god will protect you – so you need not take CARE in life.

Consider the REPRESSION that people have to endure because of it – being told what to wear, what to eat, what to drink, how to behave, who to HATE.

Of course, the reason ADVANCED countries are abandoning religion is Science and Technology. They WORK. Praying to a deity clearly does NOT.

Fact is, religion retards The Ascent Of Man – without it, we would have a permanent base on Mars by now.

Fortunately, religion is on the DECLINE world-wide. But it will take many decades – possibly a few CENTURIES – before it joins Flat-Earth belief, Astrology and other nonsense in becoming a forgotten aberration.

In the meantime, we must endure the terrorism, control and stupidity that inevitably accompany it.

And now, a song…


Trump is RIGHT. The Free Press IS The Enemy Of The People – HIS people. Obscenely rich arseholes and retarded, racist yokels. So that’s all right then.

Actually, HERE is The Enemy Of The People…


So Trump finally secures the return of war-dead corpses from North Korea.

Colour me unimpressed (did you see what I did there?)

It is said Pyongyang will return fifty-five bodies – out of fifty-three HUNDRED. That is ONE PERCENT.

Trump trumpets, “This will be a great moment for so many families.”

So many – one of his favourite, self-aggrandising catch-phrases – except on this occasion, even he must hear how HOLLOW his bluster sounds.

In addition to that one percent, the DELAY hardly equates it to similar instances after the Vietnam War. Then, there were grieving parents – whereas here, said parents would now be well over A HUNDRED YEARS OLD.

And as for their children; while age stats are hard to obtain (why?) there is no doubt that most of the dead would have been in their early twenties or younger – meaning that few would have HAD any.

Plus those that do exist would hardly have been old enough, when their parent(s) left, to have bonded with them at all.

So once more it’s bullsh*t. Then again, we would expect nothing else from Trump.


We’ve all seen it; the man wraps his hands around the woman’s neck and squeezes – then after a few seconds of wriggling, her hands around his wrists, the eyes flutter and close – and she goes limp and expires. BALDERDASH!

The reality is that actual strangulation is a highly technical discipline which, luckily, few people in this world have mastered. All that most men can do is cause asphyxiation – which takes a LOT longer.

And while he is trying, his goolies will generally present a perfect target for the woman’s KNEE – and if not, she still has her head and hands to bring into play. If his face is close to hers, she can swiftly tilt her head forwards and smash his nose to pulp with her forehead. If it is further away, a right cross will break his jaw. And even if his arms are at full stretch, his reach is hampered by the fact that his hands are around her neck – thus her finger-tips will be free to JAM into his eye-sockets.

But while any one of the above moves would be guaranteed to ensure the man lost all interest in the job in hand – it would not suit the entertainment industry. You see, the reason the actress places her hands around the actor’s wrists is SAFETY-DEFAULT. She is ACTUALLY straining to pull his hands IN, TOWARDS her neck, while he is straining to move them OUTWARDS and away.

This enables both to act their socks off, while posing no danger of DEATH to the actress.

But this format is now TIRED. Today’s women would definitely NOT go gently into the night, the way they are portrayed on the screen.

I myself have never tried to strangle a woman (despite occasional SEVERE provocation) but can assure the reader that had I been foolish enough to try – I would STILL be walking funny.


Nowadays, people wear T-shirts that give FREE advertising to commercial concerns, but In My Day, T-shirts had SLOGANS like MAKE LOVE NOT WAR and I’M WITH STUPID and FRANKIE SAYS RELAX (allright, that last one WAS an ad for a commercial concern, but still).

Anyhay, a while back I decided to buy a bunch of T-shirts and sell them with NEW slogans – mostly MINE. It never happened and now I’m retired. But I offer the slogans here, for YOUR entertainment.

And if any T-shirt manufacturer should happen across this piece – they’re YOURS for ten percent off the top, okay? Here they are. Unless indicated otherwise, they are MY COPYRIGHT!





I’M SURROUNDED BY IDIOTS  (with the Mensa logo)














Remember – ten percent! Oh, and if you like shorts, why not visit my smarter brother, Morpheus – on and checkout “Oxymorons” – or my Zen brother, Cornelius on  and peruse his “Random Thoughts” and “Favourite Quotes”. It’s all good!


Trump says, “I’ll know in a minute…it’s my touch, it’s my feel.”

For crissake, you’re going on a political summit – not a blind date.

It’s like sending Archie Bunker to negotiate with Adolf Hitler.

Why not just put them in a bare-knuckle ring, like in Frankie Goes To Hollywood’s “Two Tribes” video?

An unfair fight? Well, granted Fatboy Kim (sorry Norm) is half Trump’s age, but as Jack Carter said, “You’re a big man, but you’re in bad shape.”

Oh god oh god we’re all going to die…


Sam Bee called a celeb a rude word.

It is a fair bet that around the same time, somewhere in the world, an unloved, un-cared-for kitten got SQUASHED by a vehicle.

Which incident do YOU care most about?


The thing that UGLY people need, to succeed in this world.

Elsewhere in these scribblings, I have attempted to solve the riddle of The Afterlife.

And with a smattering of science, a dollop of intuition and a slew of LOGIC, I thought I had successfully DONE so.

I had eliminated religion as Man-made-up nonsense.

I had eliminated Near-Death Experience (white lights and tunnels) as a PHYSICAL reaction of the brain, when it believes itself to be in crisis.

And I had eliminated Spiritualism and Reincarnation as codswallop – both lacking coherant PROOF of actual contact with what I call the Exocontinuum (that which is outside what our five major senses, our twenty-something minor senses and our technology can detect).

Then I had developed a theory that the brain is in three parts. At the top lies consciousness, self-awareness, intelligence and personality – the SOUL. In the middle is empathy, reasoning, analysis, pleasure, art, style and instincts (fight or flight, harm avoidance, need for food, water, sex and so on) – the abstract. And at the bottom sits the operating system, with its programmes and MEMORY.

And I reasoned that over FIFTY YEARS, since Science had only succeeded in mimicking the BOTTOM level – whilst barely identifying the LOCATIONS of the middle one – and having no CLUE about the top – that these higher levels must be ELSEWHERE.

Further, I decided that while Science declared cessation of brain activity (the neurons stop firing, the synapses whither and the engrams decay) was the END and that consciousness does NOT survive death – this was based on KNOWN science. I figured that EMPIRICALLY, since THIS continuum was itself fundamentally ILLOGICAL – ANOTHER one (my Exocontinuum) was no LESS logical.

This was important, as it opened the door to all sorts of possibilities – and I finally concluded that the most logical one was that our upper brain functions are situated in the Exocontinuum, maintaining connection with the lower ones until untethered by our physical brains’ demise, at which time we find ourselves in the Next Life, with our consciousness and identity (minus our memories – having left our baggage from This Life behind) intact. Fine.

Along my journey to this theory, I had DISMISSED one that reasoned we might currently be in the SECOND Existence of a SERIES of same, which I had extrapolated from our INSTINCTS – theorising that they could be evolved from our experiences in an earlier and much more primitive Lifetime.

This would suggest that we would carry those, plus instincts acquired in This Life, on to the next – rinse and repeat.

Although premature Lifetime terminations (due to disease, accident, murder, whatever) would leave that person LAGGING BEHIND in the Next Life. But then, some people are idiots – so that fits.

However, I had PROBLEMS with this theory.

First; Science says our Basic Instincts are evolved from our ancestors (“race memories”). And at sixty-five, I have SEEN how brain-patterns can evolve in mere decades. Therefore, okay.

Second; the REGULATION of this Serial Lifetimes theory would suggest Intelligent Design; a Supreme Being, Force or even a GOD – which would be a giant step BACKWARDS, in any SERIOUS discussion on The Afterlife.

And third; surely after four or five Lifetimes – with no memories of the previous ones – having acquired the WISDOM of all those preceding Lifetimes, we would end up essentially living the SAME Lifetime, with no wars, poverty, evil, greed, arduosity or even DIVORCE, over and over and OVER again?

Apparently, this was tried in “The Matrix” and it did not work.

So I finally concluded that this was the FIRST and ONLY continuum – and the Exocontinuum was where we would END UP.


Now anyone who’s had SIBLINGS knows how different they become from each other, despite originating from the same place and being subject to most of the same circumstances. And Science explains this as being due to the later conditioning and influences they get.

But those who have watched a litter of puppies or kittens evolving will know how different they QUICKLY become (the aggressive one, the gentle one, the curious one, the little drama queen and so on) despite IDENTICAL conditioning and influences.

Also, we have seen how the children of decent, loving, attentive parents can often end up being ROTTEN kids – while those born to abusive, drug-addled, crime-ridden parents can often rise above their early disadvantages and become pillars of society.

Which pretty-much PROVES that Personality – like Instinct – MUST be inherited. And clearly, from at least ONE previous Lifetime.

Therefore, it looks like this IS our second go.

I wonder what the THIRD will be like…


Is THIS a dick-pic?

NO!!! It’s a new-born Mexican Hairless puppy. Aww!


Language evolves, but “editorial solutions by Moviola” is pretentious BULLSH*T. Editing is a ROUTINE PROCESS – not a PROBLEM – which is what is implied by the CORRECT use of the word SOLUTION. This crap comes from I.T.


…is a right royal f***-up, that’s for sure.

For a LONG time now, they have consistently been inconsistent, incompetent and incapable.

When you post something to the Uke from abroad, all is jake until it disappears into the black hole that is Broken Britain.

If I was QE2, I would order them to RENAME it – British Mail.

With respect Ma’am, you don’t want ANY PART of their mess.


So now the Republicans are trying to get Trump a Nobel Peace Prize.

Could he actually GET one? Well, going on the committee’s past performance…

Nine years ago, they gave President Obama one – BEFORE his presidency had got going. Even Barry said he had “no idea” why.

And ninety-nine years ago, they gave President Wilson one – despite Woody KNOWINGLY sending a million troops infected with the Great American Plague all over the world – resulting in over fifty-five million deaths. Many more than died in the actual war.

So why would they not give one to a hypomanic president (with a side of NPD) who has risked world-wide nuclear annihilation, trading school-yard taunts with an equally-unhinged dictator?


Sarah Huckabee-Sanders said, “Ty Cobb, a friend of the president, who has done a terrific job, will be retiring at the end of the month.”

Damn – I thought he retired in 1895.


YouTube began as a number of things; a place young idiots could post low-res camera vids of their idiot friends jumping off garage rooves into bushes and similar Jackass stunts, a platform for performing pussies – and the Universal Archive.

Then modern groups began uploading their latest music there, to promote their live tours – thus cutting out the record companies – a complete reversal to the way things had been done during the Pop era (1920-2000).

Which was all fine until the service got taken over by Google.

Google’s motto – “Don’t be evil – but it’s okay to be invasive, pushy, controlling and monumentally arrogant” – became YouTube’s – to which they added bullying, greedy and miserable.

Thing is, YouTube’s business model was unique; their videos – their PRODUCT – was supplied FREE, from the public.

Therefore you would think they would treat their BENEFACTORS with COURTESY and GRATITUDE. Right? NO. In addition to constantly ripping them off – they would ARBITRARILY DELETE their channels whenever they felt like it, refusing even to respond to appeals.

This would result in people losing hours, days – sometimes YEARS of work, at the whim of these arseholes.

But as other despots have discovered in the past, keep treating the public with CONTEMPT and eventually there will be CONSEQUENCES.

And in YouTube’s case, they came in the form of one Nasim Najafi Aghdam – who visited their offices and WENT POSTAL. After shooting several employees, she blew her brains all over the office carpet.

Initial reports claimed her actions were part of a domestic dispute, but eventually the truth emerged – YouTube had ripped HER off and messed up her channel.

I have no doubt that when this story broke World-wide, THOUSANDS of former victims of YouTube nodded their heads sagely – and some even cracked a SMILE.

So will YouTube LEARN from this tragic incident?

I somewhat doubt it.


Further, in all that time I have never managed to understand how ANY thinking grownup COULD hold on to any of these clearly-Man-made-up entities.

But then, what do I know? I thought Plato was a Greek washing-up liquid.


Did you see Trump’s rally for Rick Saccone?

Saccone LOST – then again, if Trump had promoted HIM instead of HIMSELF, for over an hour…

But the thing I could not tear my eyes away from was a bozo in the audience BEHIND Trump – up on the top left of the crowd.

Now my Mum always said it is wicked to mock the afflicted – but I think she would give me a free pass where Trump is involved.

This yokel had a CARTOON NECK. It was bigger than MY WAIST.

He was wearing a tee-shirt, but I dare say if he ever needed a proper shirt, NO outsize shop would be able to accommodate him – he would HAVE to go bespoke.

This is the best picture of him I could find…


For any writer, freedom of speech is paramount. But is it really desirable across the board? The problem is, with freedom goes responsibility. Let’s examine a few examples…

A racist gets up on a soap-box in a predominantly immigrant neighbourhood and begins a diatribe of racist philosophising. Now in an ideal World he would be ignored, laughed at, or invited to stick his head up his arse.

But we do not LIVE in an ideal World – and the PRACTICAL result of allowing him his freedom of speech would likely be mayhem, during which property and PEOPLE could be seriously DAMAGED.

Or a film director creates a work portraying some atrocity or other, to make a point about The Human Condition. Intelligent people view the work and absorb its message – but one NUT who is unable to separate fantasy from reality goes and COMMITS the atrocity.

You see the problem. Individual freedom is fine – so long as it doesn’t interfere with someone ELSE’S freedom. If I want to play my stereo LOUDLY, that’s great – unless my neighbour is trying to sleep.

Ideally, one should be free to buy dynamite. But the REALITY of allowing such freedom would be that NO-ONE would be SAFE.

Only an IDIOT would sanction the over-the-counter sale of dynamite, right? That would be like allowing ordinary people to buy GUNS…


I see in the news that Trump has finally moved (slightly) on the issue of bump stocks. I suppose he had to do something after one of their chief manufacturers took the P*SS out of him with a Presidents Day promotion that included the coupon code – “MAGA”.

For those few who don’t know, a bump stock is a spring-loaded sleeve or slide that fits onto a rifle’s stock, effectively converting it from a semi-automatic weapon (which fires as fast as you can pull the trigger – say three rounds a second) to a fully-automatic one (if you keep the trigger pulled, it manages around ten).

Of course since you have to hold the gun loosely, like the “tommy-gun” of the gangster era it isn’t too accurate – but when you’re firing into a crowd, that doesn’t matter so much. Paddock fired well over a thousand rounds in the Vegas attack and managed to kill about sixty people and wound another eight hundred and fifty.

Then again, Mateen managed to take out around the same number (although the wounded count was far smaller) at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando – without the attachment on his semi-automatic. Perhaps the improved accuracy helped. Then again God hates fags, so maybe it was Divine Intervention.

What else is in the news – ah, another school shooting. This time in Parkland. But Cruz only killed seventeen, with fourteen injured.

He should have used a bump stock.


Now, as an expat Brit living in Thailand, I love the Thais. But holy cojones, do they do some daft things. Case in point…

The Thais are obsessed by being LIGHT-SKINNED. It’s not a RACIAL thing – but rather, a CLASS thing.

You see, if someone has dark skin, it suggests they are a FARM-WORKER, as opposed to a light-skinned person, whom it is assumed works INDOORS.

Which is why you see young girls constantly shading their faces from the sun with whatever comes to hand – a magazine or something.

Of course, they have not given any thought to where their FOOD comes from, when they return from their office or wherever.

Still, commercial companies have not been slow to capitalise on this obsession, promoting everything from shampoos to hand creams as “whitening” or “lightening” – and some of these companies’ brands are WESTERN, where for fifty years, strict regulations ensure ads are Legal, Decent, Honest And Truthful.

However here, it is Let The Buyer Beware. I could openly sell a cream claiming to make people INVISIBLE.

Anyhoo, the latest silly is the titular “penis whitening” – which has hit world-wide headlines over procedures that went horribly WRONG.

But I fail to see the point if they went RIGHT. I mean, imagine a Thai girl who see her man naked for the first time. His body a mid-brown colour – with a WHITE DONG.

One can only imagine she would assume he had received a PENIS TRANSPLANT from a EUROPEAN…


Trump says he sometimes tweets in bed.

Don’t worry Donald – that often happens to men when they hit their seventies.


Uncle Joe Biden is not above dropping an “F-bomb” when the situation warrants it, if he thinks no mic can pick him up – but for public consumption, he uses words that have not been heard since the Fifties.

Malarkey, High-Jinks and Shenanigans being amongst them.

However, in this age where (in England, at least) strong language has become more acceptable (possibly thanks to Trump and Brexit – they are enough to make an archbishop kick in a stained-glass window) these words are making a comeback.

I thought I was alone in using the word malarkey ironically – but these days, I am hearing others do the same.

There is a paper here somewhere…


Thank gawd 2017 is OVER! This New Year MUST be better – RIGHT?

Except…ain’t that what we said exactly one year ago, about 2016?

At that time, Britain and America had just endured twelve months where – for the first two – barely a day had gone by when ANOTHER of our Showbiz Heroes hadn’t fallen off the twig.

Plus we had been INUNDATED with Terrorist Atrocities.

On one side of The Pond; Paris (actually, November ’15) Nice and Normandy (small, but particularly nasty). All of which made the Western headlines (even though there were a WAVE of others).

While on the other side; San Bernadino (actually, December ’15) and Orlando dominated.

And this Year Of Living Dangerously lead to two other unmitigated disasters – Brexit and Trump.

The two are commonly spoken of in the same sentence, because their causes were ONE – FEAR.

Fact was, many of those who voted for Brexit AND Trump did so in the misbegotten belief that their stances on Immigration would afford protection from the Terrorists – despite the fact said Terrorists invariably turned out to have been CITIZENS (i.e., home-grown).

But these voters were INVISIBLE; the pollsters were unaware that since a vote for Leave or Trump was seen by some as RACIST – many had chosen to LIE and told the anonymous pollsters they were voting for Remain or Old Ma Clinton.

Which is why both results came as an almighty SHOCK (although after the first – Brexit – yours truly could see where others stumbled blind, banging on about policies, thus PREDICTED the Trump result a week before the vote).

However, what was done was DONE. The British hoped that in 2017, Brexit would miraculously turn out to be a Blessing In Disguise – but of course, it turned into a FIASCO.

The only bright spot was when Leggy May decided to “firm up” her position and silence her critics by holding a snap General Election.

HAH! She lost a comfortable Majority and had to get into bed with a bunch of far-right Irish retards (specific – not racist) in order to cling on to power by her bony little fingers.

While back across The Pond, Americans were praying desperately that Trump’s pre-election ranting would prove to be like the “trash-talk” boxers engage in before a fight – and that once ensconced in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Trumpster would calm the hell down and begin acting presidential.

Again, HAH! The only agreeable result of the Trump Saga has been the fun had on Late Night chat-shows – particularly Colbert’s – at the never-ending catalogue of bumblings, crudities, ravings, absurdities and posturing of the man everyone now knows is BONKERS (actually, hypomanic – with a side of NPD).

And while the BACKLASH on BOTH sides of The Pond has been EPIC during 2017, it has not been epic ENOUGH.

Brexit and Trump – BOTH of those bastards are STILL THERE.


After WW2, European electronics giant Philips decided to enter the record biz.

By that time, British recording giant EMI had SLIPPED as far as sound quality was concerned – their equipment being from the Thirties – so given Philips’ equipment was brand NEW, the newcomer managed to wrest the European distribution rights to American behemoth Columbia’s catalogue away from them.

This resulted in their enjoying a decade of ready-made, middle-of-the-road hits.

But as the contract’s end approached and Columbia made it known they intended releasing THEMSELVES when it did, Philips got off their arses and began trying to find TALENT.

Their best early signing was a folk trio called the Springfields. This comprised of Tom Springfield (Dion O’Brien) his sister Dusty (Mary) – and some other guy.

They had LOTS of hits around the turn of the Sixties, thus when they announced they were splitting up, a nation mourned.

But actually, it turned out to be a GOOD thing – Tom was a folk nut, while Dusty preferred SOUL.

And thus it was that Tom went off and discovered, then produced and wrote for an Australian folk group called the Seekers – who dominated the Sixties.

While Dusty hooked up with composer/producer/arranger Ivor Raymonde and between them, they gave Philips a series of belting soul hits that, along with numbers by failed US group the Walker Brothers (none of whom, like the Springfields, were actually named Walker) CARRIED Philips through the mid-Sixties.

Of course, all good things come to an end and like EMI, Decca and Pye, Philips lost the plot at the end of the Sixties (embarrassingly, they had to get EMI to press some copies of a one-off novelty smash called “Cinderella Rockefella” in 1968) and fizzled out during the Seventies.

But given the Season, here is a now-forgotten but at the time HUGELY successful Christmas hit from the Springfields. Come with me to 1961…


Too young to die.

Too old to live.


Me now being sixty-five, you might expect my naustalgia to be all about the SIXTIES – easily the best decade of the last century, with its Golden Year of 1967 (you should see the CHARTS). But NO.

MY Golden Decade ran from 1998 to 2007. The Age Of TRANCE.

You see, while my teens and twenties were not without pith and moment (I moved to London at sixteen, caught the tail end of the Swingin’ Sixties – DID inhale – then got into the London Jazz Scene – and partied with twenty-odd girls) my life didn’t REALLY take off until I hit FORTY.

By then, I had married – produced a child (well, SHE did) – divorced – partied with another twenty-odd girls (well, ladies) – and settled down with Mandy – a woman I liked, but did not love.

This period too had its moments – the best being during my Drive Around Europe. I lived in my tiny estate car – a trick I had developed while holidaying in the Scottish Trossachs – so it was dirt cheap.

Down through France to Marseilles (Futurascope) – then along the Old Coast Road (swam at Cannes, drove round the Monaco GP cct; the wrong way) to Pisa (wonky tower) – then through Rome (unbelievably bad drivers – if you see a car without a dent, it’s from out-of-town) – spent a day in Venice (gondola ride – got a massive splinter in my arse – not kidding) – then up through the Alps to Vienna (Harry Lime) – then across to Salzburg (Sound Of Music) and up the autobahn (when they reach the “advisory” limits, everyone FLOORS it – you’re doing ninety and little old ladies are zooming past you in Fiats – if a Merc comes up behind you doing 150, get out of his way or he’ll drive THROUGH you) to Leipzig (Gothic v modern) – then across to Berlin (drove through the Brandenberg Gate – unthinkable, a few years earlier) and Hamburg (Reeperbahn – dreary) – finally ending up for a REST in a Dutch Centreparc (sat in the sauna watching a huge spider build a web – spent the evenings watching a pretty good couple cover Chris Isaak’s book) – then back to Blighty in time for supper (after a month driving on the WRONG side of the road, it took a while to re-adjust). Two thousand miles in a month. Here are some pictures…

…and here are some of Venice. I had good weather throughout. It’s IMPOSSIBLE to take a bad picture in Vienna on a sunny day – although I had to hope some prat wouldn’t ruin the LAST one by popping into shot before that guy with the tray reached the end of the alley – GREAT perspective shot…

But this isn’t about any of that.

No, my REAL partying began in 1998, when it occurred to me that The Millennium was fast approaching and I had NO LIFE.

So I GENTLY unhooked Mandy and headed for THAILAND.

I knew that women in the Orient valued maturity and sophistication over youth and a V-shape – and that the SUN usually shone in Thailand (unlike Britain, since the 1987 Climate Shift).

Thus my first visit – a month – in 1998, was instructive – and totally WILD. Although when I accidentally wandered into a ladyboy bar one night…

Anyhah, when I headed back to spend the last three months of 1999 there, I was on a MISSION. At that time, it was considered possible that on January 1st, 2000, the ageing Russian computers controlling their nuclear arsenal might trigger WW3.

In the event, an ATM in Croyden High Street ran out of twenties.

But as September, 1999 began – I had no way of knowing that. And so began my THREE MONTHS of INTENSE partying, on the islands of Samui and Phan Ngan.

A typical day began around lunchtime, with a laze in the pool of the resort I had selected, on Samui.

Then around five, after showering and dressing, I would straddle my rented comedy step-through motorbike and head for The Bars. The bike handled like rubbish, but only cost two pounds a day.

Arriving at the open bars, I would look for The Girl. At this time, the music was quiet, so I could TALK to her.

Then having drunk only token Pepsis, I would pay my “bar fine” (in Thailand, you pay for a lady’s TIME – not her body – and extra to the bar if you leave early, thus depriving the bar of a shill) and depart with said Girl.

They would hop on the back of the comedy motorbike (frequently riding side-saddle) and I would take them for dinner (usually at McDonalds) – then back to my seaside “bungalow” at the resort, where we would “party” for a few hours.

Here is a video I made of that (the bike and bungalow – not the partying, gimme a break)…

…that music was by an old chum, Alan Haven.

Anyhoo, after said partying was done, the REAL partying would begin. We would climb aboard the bike and head off up the mountain road to the Green Mango. We would drink SEVERAL beers somewhere nearby, then at MIDNIGHT – the bendy sound of André Tanneberger’s “9PM (Til I Come)”…

…would emanate from the Green Mango, signalling their three-hour TRANCE set – and their customer base would instantly swell from a handful of dancers to a couple of HUNDRED – me and The Girl included. This was the Mango…

…oh, the nights I gave it LARGE on that stage. It was another world…

I recall the night “Soundshaft” – a new (but short-lived) rival to the Mango – opened. Me and a guy half my age stood in for the dancers (who hadn’t turned up) high up on a ledge, by a giant mirror-ball. We dropped down to the dance-floor to do beer runs, while my Girl sat at the bar, wondering if her date would SURVIVE.

However, what she didn’t know was I had a finger hooked around the safety bar, embedded in the pillar behind me (intended for the pros, who would wear a SAFETY belt). I was drunk, but not STUPID.

After, the manager presented me with a free Soundshaft tee-shirt, for lasting the whole night. I still have it.

Anyhay, around three, a “ballad” would play and we would troupe out, then a big guy would haul my steed out of the pile (he knew us and our bikes by sight – genius) and me and The Girl would climb on and wobble off down Green Mango Road (you can drive those things better drunk than sober) back to the bungalow.

There, I would down half a pint of water to forestall any hangover (a TIP there – hangovers are caused by DEHYDRATION) and we would collapse into bed.

But every seventh night, there was a Dark or Half Moon Party at the “Secret Beach” (it was advertised all over town) – a cove a couple of miles from the Mango – and we would all ride off there and lay on mats on the beach, listening to a gently pulsating House system ’til dawn.

One night, it RAINED. Now in Thailand, although it rarely rains, when it does it can be BIBLICAL. So we jumped on the bike and rode THROUGH IT, back to the resort.

The kitchen was still open and “Jimmy” – the ladyboy who ran the place – said he was not closing for anything. He jumped from table-top to table-top, pulling down the screens.

We ordered, then nipped off to change, as we were LITERALLY soaked to the skin.

Then we enjoyed our meal, while a dog gave birth to a litter of puppies, underneath the verandah. We fed her some chicken afterwards, for her efforts.

Then of course, every FOUR weeks, there came the legendary FULL MOON PARTY, on the neighbouring island of Phan Ngan.

My early times, we would take the small ferry from the top of Samui, but then speedboat owners began bribing the cops to ban it due to “rough seas” – then said speedboat owners would swoop in…

I recall a ride where I asked the owner – who was well drunk – why a 15-year-old boy was driving his boat. He answered that they wouldn’t let HIM drive it any more. It WAS pretty rough, but the kid was surprisingly skilful and got us onto the Full Moon beach fine. I enjoyed the trip – my Girl, rather less so. 

In later years, I would take the large afternoon ferry, book a hotel room and travel to the beach – over the dreaded mountain track – on a Songthaew. In olden times, this had been a dirt road, which was lethal when wet – but by my time, it had thankfully been concreted.

I remember one night when, upon reaching the top, we were welcomed by an incredible sight – the sea below us was choppy and each wavelet was reflecting the full moon.

As we stared at this magical vista, we said that we would remember that sight for the rest of our lives.

Many have tried to capture the Full Moon Party on film or video. Few have succeeded. Here is MY effort…

…over the years, I went to MANY Full Moon Parties. They’re crap now.

Anyhow, in those days, a good way to decompress The Morning After was to go to a local monastery and have a steam with the monks…

Well, that’s about that. Of course, this account misses out MUCH. Oh, I could tell you some stories. But then, most of them would land me in JAIL.

The point of this is to show that if you miss out on furious partying in your twenties – it is not TOO LATE. Provided you maintain your Inner Child – and innate curiosity – and the ability to go with the flow – and can still marvel at the awe and majesty of it all – you can DO IT.

And being older and wiser means you have a better chance of SURVIVING it.

F’rinstance, I may have partied SUPER HARD during those dying months of 1999 – but I had the COMMONSENSE to take one day OFF in every five or so, to allow my old body to RECOVER.

Therefore – unlike some – I’M STILL HERE!

Oh, and eventually I met HER. THE ONE. Girl number one hundred and six (-ish).

And we have now been married for over sixteen years – but still have a bop in the living room to Trance CDs, played on the 6-channel…


I hear Greggs are taking some heat over one of their adverts…

…some say it is tasteless (it looks delicious to me).

Then again, Jesus backwards IS Susej!


Baptist church…Texas…lone shooter…ballistic vest…automatic assault rifle…twenty-six dead…ages from seventy-two to five…many more injured…thoughts and prayers…not the time to talk about gun control…yah-di-yah-di-yah-di-yah…

Also today, around a HUNDRED people died in road traffic accidents in America. The reason these deaths were not widely reported is that they were ROUTINE.

Is it not time to treat American mass shootings likewise?

I mean, the solution IS in their own hands…


I like the way the new 12-sided Pound coin resembles the classic THRE’PENNY BIT!

For those young-uns who don’t know what I’m talking about; In The Old Days, when we had two hundred and forty pennies (not “pence”) to the Pound, there was a three-penny coin.

The last version was produced from 1937 to 1967, after which it was discontinued in anticipation of decimalisation, which happened in stages around 1970.

And it is HIGHLY APPROPRIATE, given the Pound today is worth nearly the SAME as the thre’penny bit was, in 1937!

I KID YOU NOT – with inflation, right now the humble 1937 3d is worth just on EIGHTY PENCE! FACT.


Roy Moore must feel CONFLICTED today. On the one hand, his headwear suggests he likes Country music – while his little gun demonstrates his support for the Second Amendment.

So when Stephen Paddock shot more than fifty Country Music Festival attendees to death – and injured over five hundred more – at least his RIGHTS were not being restricted.

So that’s all right then.


Picture the scene; the last pair are coming down the eighteenth fairway in a major golf tournament. Several strokes ahead of the rest of the field, these two are level.

After indifferent second strokes they both recover, to make the green in three.

One is fifteen feet from the hole, so goes first. He drops it in the cup.

Now all attention turns to the other player, just SEVEN feet from the hole.

If he sinks this putt, the match will immediately continue as a sudden-death playoff.

But before he plays the shot, let us add a little colour…

This guy is a young, handsome up-and-comer, whom some are dubbing the new Tiger Woods.

The other guy is a former champion – but recently, he was caught on a camera-phone making a remark that many saw as racist, when it was put up onto social media.

The PGA ruled the remark was ambiguous – but the affair left a sour taste in the mouth.

That aside, this pairing has proved to be a legendary match, the lead being swapped several times.

And right now, just feet away from the golfer and his ball, seventeen thousand people are crammed into the surrounding stands.

While another twenty MILLION are watching, around the World, on live TV.

There is a slight right borrow on the line to the hole.

He strikes the ball firmly – but has misread the borrow. The ball will clearly PASS the hole by an inch or so. Calamity!

But here’s the point; if there was anything TO telekinesis, it would require a mere fraction of an ounce of effort to deflect that one-point-six ounce golf ball the tiny amount necessary to cause it to make the hole.

So with seventeen thousand people just feet away – and millions more around the World – all WISHING with their very being it would swerve…

…if telekinesis WAS a thing – that damn ball would circle the hole three times, jump up in the air and PLOP down into the cup!

I rest my case.


If Fatboy Kim keeps pushing Trump’s buttons, I worry Trump may decide to nuke Seoul.

Yes, I know Seoul is the capital of SOUTH Korea.

I know that – you know that – but does TRUMP know that?


I FIRMLY believe the Leader Of The Free World has HYPOMANIA.

Manic depression (a.k.a. bipolarity) is well known – but hypomania less so.

According to Wikipedia, hypomania (literally “under mania”) is characterized by persistent disinhibition and pervasive elevated (euphoric) mood, with or without irritability.

Hypomania is distinct from mania in that there is no significant functional impairment, but it may have psychotic features.

Characteristic behaviours are that the subject is extremely energetic, talkative, and confident – commonly exhibiting flights of creative ideas.

While hypomanic behaviour often generates productivity and excitement, it can become troublesome if the subject engages in risky or otherwise inadvisable behaviours.

Hypomania can be associated with narcissistic personality disorder.


While many former presidents have had ONE disaster in their four or eight year terms (Bush – Iraq, Clinton – a certain chubby intern, Reagan – the Iran Contra affair, Nixon – Watergate and JFK – Bay of Pigs) Donald Trump has them every WEEK.

This last week, his on/off statements regarding the various fascist groups in Charlottesville have actually pushed the little matter of the previous week’s sabre-rattling with Fatboy Kim (which could YET trigger a NUCLEAR WAR) out of the public’s consciousness.

The week before, he unilaterally announced removing all LGBT people from the US military (WITHOUT consulting said military).

A week earlier – the “Mooch” fiasco.

And before those, Russian “collusion” – and bed-peeing prostitutes, the hot mic “grab ’em by the pussy” incident, the Clinton “lock her up” campaign, over e-mail servers, his insistence (despite conclusive photographic evidence to the contrary) that his inaugural crowd was bigger than Barry’s, the “Birther” fiasco, his rants about the “fake news” media, that damn WALL, his claim that he WON the “popular vote” – the list is ENDLESS.

Then there is his paranoia over top staffers that has lead to his FIRING half of them.

And all the while, his stream of TWEETS have looked like those of a spoilt ten-year-old.

The Late Night hosts have had a FIELD DAY.

But the problem is, the “serious” media has taken all his insanities LITERALLY – like the characters around “Dougie Jones” in the new “Twin Peaks” – or those around “Chance The Gardener” in “Being There” – just assuming him to be EVIL, rather than BONKERS.

I have heard NO psychiatrist accuse Trump of being clinically insane, which is understandable – since such a declaration would likely rip their career to shreds.

Yet while the defence would be that the shrink had never MET The Donald – and was therefore in no position to diagnose him – the MASSIVE amount of evidence (his speeches, his tweets – and his actions) in the public domain CLEARLY SHOWS his mental disability.

I have personally KNOWN a hypomanic person INTIMATELY for over twenty years – she accepts her condition and refuses to take meds for it – and she is JUST like Trump.

Thus I feel like the child in Hans Christian Anderson’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes” – who ALONE can see the truth.

I just hope someone ELSE does, before this man KILLS us all.


The tourist brochures describe Guam as  “star-sand beaches, crystal clear blue skies and world-famous sunsets.”

Sounds like a nice place to visit.

Not right NOW, of course.


For a long time, we knew nothing of Jared – he had never spoken widely. But now he has, it is clear he is a major DWEEB.

And having seen Ivanka many times on her daddy’s TV show, we already knew what SHE is like.

Thus it is pretty clear who wears the trousers in THAT relationship.

Of course, some would point out Ivanka “converted” to Judaism for her geeky groom – but then, that is hardly the same as if it had been the other way round.

I mean, her lady-parts did not have to be MUTILATED.

How hard could it have been? Read a book – then endure a boring ceremony?

Every man who has read “Under The Tuscan Sun” and sat through the movie for their woman has done THAT.

Plus, while Ivanka was a babe when she was young – she has not WORN well. These days, Tiffany is the cute Trump.

And if, in the months to come, Jared’s interests conflict with those of his unpredictable pa-in-law – which way will Ivanka JUMP?

Her hubby – or her DAD?

Watch this space…


I was sad to see Spicey go – first kicked upstairs – then OUT, by the Trump machine. He was FUNNY.

Then in came the titular woman. A dopey, humourless woman who will probably do well, as a Trump apologist.

But where did she COME from? Was she the product of an unholy union between Mike Huckabee and Bernie Sanders? Surely not.

So I looked her up: it turns out she is indeed the progeny of Mike Huckabee – but is simply married to some bloke called Sanders (it’s a common enough name; George, Larry, Colonel).

I wonder who SNL will come up with to lampoon HER…


As a Brit, I am astonished that neither the Grauniad nor the political commentators/satirists (from whom I obtain most of my information regarding the country I escaped from, some fifteen years ago) have picked up on this – but after her recent election “victory” Leggy May clearly referred to her misbegotten party as “The Conservative AND UNIONIST Party” – WHAT?!?

This was clearly a lame attempt to LEGITIMISE her desperate, unholy hook-up with the Democratic Unionist Party of Northern Ireland.

The problem is, it relies on total historical IGNORANCE on the part of the electorate – which tragically, appears to have WORKED.

So let this historian dispossess said electorate with a few FACTS…

The “full name” of the Conservative Party, virtually unused for about FIFTY YEARS until Leggy’s election debacle, does indeed include “And Unionist” – but that has NOTHING to do with the DUP.

It ACTUALLY refers to the LIBERAL Unionists who merged with the Conservatives – over a HUNDRED YEARS ago! 1912, actually – the year the Titanic sank (rather like her premiership has).

While the Democratic Unionists were only formed in 1971 – by IAN PAISLEY (young people and non-Brits, hit…

I refer to my alter-ego Morpheus, to FINISH this piece…

….DUP stands for Democratic Unionist Party. But in this case, the word “democratic” is like the word “socialist” was – with the NAZI party.

Yes, in both cases words that normally imply LEFT-wing sympathies were actually applied to EXTREME RIGHT-WING parties.

Face it, Leggy – the DUP are a bunch of primitive, barbaric retards who make your Tory wing of the British Party look like LIBERALS in comparison.

They don’t even have the same aspirations as you – and you’re getting into bed with THEM?

Okay, they’re the ONLY way you can stay in power – but GAWDELP us all now…


Of course, there is no such thing – the Interweb is FREE. One imagines what the Trumpster was referring to was CORPORATION tax – of which I hear Google pays very little.

But then again, this is rich coming from a man who publicly BOASTED how little tax HIS businesses paid, during his Presidential Debates with the woman (only) he calls “Crooked” Hilary.

And what ABOUT those taxes? Thus far, he still refuses to open up HIS tax accounts…


So I happened upon the following picture…

…and I thought, “Oh that’s nice, it’s Eric Trump; holding a large cat. Better than his father, who prefers GROPING pussies.

But then the horrible truth dawned. This cat wasn’t a pet – it was a TROPHY. The animal was DEAD.

Despite the fact that the leopard had not threatened Eric or anyone he might have felt responsible for, the goofy tosser had SHOT it in the name of sport.


Okay, you small-dicked excuse for a man; how about this? We’ll get into a ring – you armed with a pair of sharp scissors and me armed with a Colt 45.

THEN we’ll have some sport…


After 146 years, Ringling Bros And Barnum & Bailey’s Circus is no more. Good.

However, while this author is no more in favour of pressing wild animals into performing “tricks” than any other right-minded person, this piece is not about that.

No, my beef is with the concept of the Three-Ring Circus – adopted by a number of circuses (circi?) but pioneered by RB/B&BC.

This idea could ONLY have come from America.

I recall how in Britain, Saturday Morning Kids’ TV fare consisted of perhaps a CFF (Children’s Film Foundation) movie – where the kids were the central characters – plus maybe a couple of kid-friendly educational programmes, with usually some sort of magazine-type show, where kids took part. And a half-hour programme of cartoons.

But in The States, Saturday Mornings featured a six-hour block of JUST cartoons (cheap, low-animation ones – later, becoming deeply unfunny, PC, computer-created monstrosities).

The thinking (?) behind this was cartoons were the most POPULAR programmes – so why have anything else?

But then, I like chocolate mouse – however, I would not want a DIET of the stuff.

These Saturday Morning TV traditions go a long way to explaining why Americans now have, on average, lower IQs than Brits.

And it is the same problem with those Three-Ring Circuses – the notion that you can never have too much of a good thing.

The centre ring is reserved for the primo acts, while the beta ones get stuck with the outer two. And they perform SIMULTANEOUSLY.


A conventional single-ring circus has its roster of acts, which run with MINIMAL pauses (except when equipment needs to be assembled or taken down – but that is done in the intermissions) and the CLOWNS are sent out to paper over those.

Thus a single-ring circus is INTIMATE, involving and immersive.

Having THREE rings is like having three TVs in your living room, side-by-side, running three different programmes concurrently.

Which is enough to turn ANYONE’S brain to MUSH.

So, Greatest Show On Earth – good riddance.


…is currently nearing its end.

And since its ramifications will doubtless be a topic of conversation for decades to come, this observer has decided to put in his two penn’orth NOW.

The experiment had two components.

One: could an experienced big businessman run America like a big business?

And two: could a blue collar guy (Trump may live in a golden palace, but he is still working-class) with no experience of politics run America using down-home commonsense?

Well, four months in, clearly the answer to both questions is a resounding NO.

As Trump discovered, politics is complicated.

While big businessmen swan through life as their minions sweep their indiscretions under the carpet – following the 08-09 Crash, few ended up in jail – the political world is not so easy to manipulate.

There are rafts of oversight committees, congressional hearings and a whole slew of government departments, any or all of whom will comb through every aspect of your deeds, minutely examining each one for a scintilla of irregularity.

Of course, in banana republics, the individuals in charge of those committees, courts and bureaucratic institutions would be quickly DISAPPEARED. But Trump is the President – not El Presidente.

And unlike the Prime Minister of the UK – who is all-powerful – the POTUS sits in a bubble called the Executive Branch. Thus the moniker of The Most Powerful Man In The World is a JOKE. He may have the Launch Codes, but much as he might like to – he cannot drop a nuke on WASHINGTON.

So right now, that establishment is moving in on him. He will be GONE by Christmas – the only question is whether he will resign or wait to get impeached. My money is on the former.

But what will happen then?

Mike Pence, that’s what. As the Republicans breathe a collective sigh of relief, he will take over the Big Chair and dump Bannon and his cronies. Then, having quietly kept his distance from his flamboyant former boss, this Christian Right smoothy will have carte blanche over the next four years – and possibly another EIGHT – to steadily push The States even further back into the Dark Ages.

I almost prefer Trump.


Corporations love initials. They enable them to imprint themselves onto the public consciousness – but they have their drawbacks.

F’rinstance, while three initials would seem to offer an infinite amount of possibilities (well, 17,576 anyway) once you take into account the popularity of different letters they reduce dramatically.

And some combinations get downright over-used – the ubiquitous ABC, for example. American Broadcasting Company, Associated British Cinemas, Andover Bowling Club, Austrian Boxing Commission, Aniseed Ball Corporation (okay, I’m making them up now – but Google ABC and the entries’ll be in the millions).

The problem prompted the Dutch national airline to come up with KLM. Which doesn’t stand for ANYTHING. No, they hadn’t been smoking that stuff again – it was merely a ploy. K, L and M are consecutive in the alphabet – thus role off the tongue easily – and it was figured no-one else would use ’em.

Of course, Pan-American Airlines originally went with PAA, but when they discovered that people were colloquially referring to them as “Pan-Am” – they sensibly cashed in on it.

BA (just TWO initials) is British Airways – The World’s Least Favourite Airline – and was originally two companies: BEA (British and European Airways) and BOAC (British and Overseas Air Corporation) – which brings into focus the idea of using FOUR initials.

But as soon as you go with FOUR, people INEVITABLY try and turn them into acronyms. Which with BOAC doesn’t WORK (bow-ack?) and with others can be embarrassing. Take the U.S. government.

Having unintentionally WON the Cold War (see elsewhere in these ramblings) they needed a new Evil Empire and unwisely chose the Middle East – which blew up in their faces on 11/09/01 (9/11)

Their reaction was to retaliate, but realising they had bitten off more than they could chew, they went looking for help. They could hardly call their argument The West’s War Against Islamic Fundamentalism, so their spin-doctors came up with The War Against Terrorism.

Unfortunately, they hadn’t thought it through, ’cause TWAT is a coarse word for a lady’s naughty bits – so they hastily modified it to The War On Terrorism (even though TWOT is a “soft” version of the afore-mentioned).

Thus it can be seen that not only are four initials harder to recall than three, but they can also jump up and bite you in the arse. Just ask my friend – Steven Harold Ian Thompson.


…the dictionary definition of which is; “The mouth of either a male or a female. Used as a derogatory meaning” – thus it is not even limited to the LGBT community.

And when Stephen Colbert used the expression on his Late Show, to describe Trump’s relationship with Putin, it was – well, late. And CBS bleeped the word “cock” anyway.

Therefore the gay, liberal, View-watching public – and most others – are fine with it. In fact the only objectors are Trump supporters and other right-wing arseholes.

So it looks like the most that will happen will be a token fine from the FCC to Colbert and/or CBS. Big deal. And by the time it happens, the only “news” service likely to report it will be Breitbart.

However, this observer does have ONE issue with the incident.

Thing is, like most people, I despair over Trump, Brexit and Marine Le Pen (although as I type, the French voting booths are open – and this time, the pollsters’ predictions would have to have TOTALLY screwed for HER to make it). Meaning I REALLY NEED Mister Colbert (like these columns, he is a sane voice in a world gone mad).

And likewise the lovely Jim Parsons, who leads by far the best TV sitcom on the planet right now.

Therefore I was slightly dismayed to see the latter on the former’s Late Show, defending the cock holster remark.

Why? Because it was clearly the ONLY REASON JIM WAS THERE.

His having earned around seventy million bucks for the last three seasons of Big Bang – and having just signed for two more, which will gross him another fifty-odd (in addition to the considerable amount he must have glommed from the previous seven) – means he hardly needs the $500 appearance fee.

And with the current season about to end, CBS did not need him to promote the series.

Also, I noted he mentioned he was gay – which everyone knows, so these days he rarely references it in interviews.

Thus it seems clear that the company decided his appearance would help to defuse the situation. So they flew him across the country for the purpose and, as another employee, Parsons could hardly refuse.

Of course, CBS could not give a toss about upsetting Breitbart – or even Trump. But pissing off the Rainbow People…

However, their corporate response does rather bring two words to mind; “nut” and “sledgehammer”…

UPDATE! I see that while Jim was running interference for CBS on Colbert’s Late Show, Kaley Cuoco was hastily booked on Fallon’s Tonight Show (maybe they shared the flight up – first class, of course). Ironic, given Jimmy is in opposition to Stephen.

She ALSO had nothing to sell.

Clever one, CBS – the word “smokescreen” immediately springs to mind.

Oh, and as expected, Marine Le Pen got SPANKED by Manny Macron.


So Leggy May calls a snap election – why?

For the sake of non-Brits, a little background…

Britain is a One-Party State. The party consists of two wings – the “left” wing is called Labour – the “right” wing, Conservative or Tory.

And this organisation has ruled Britain for over a century.

They have achieved this by constant gerrymandering (Wiki it) and only pretending the wing currently in “opposition” actually is.

Thus a second party would need about sixty percent of the popular vote to unseat it – and the “opposition” wing lies in wait for their turn, never seriously attacking the ruling wing.

Which is why the only two serious challenges to their authority post-WW2 (the Gang Of Four and Cleggy) were both fiascos.

Then came Brexit…

Thanks to lies, fraud and chiefly the population’s fear of foreign terrorism – the Leave vote won. By one-point-eight percent of those who voted.

The Prime Minister – who had campaigned for Remain – resigned.

Leggy May – who had also supported Remain – took over, declaring she had a Mandate (she is a milf) and would carry out the Will Of The People.

No-one quite knows why…

There is no doubt that were a second referendum held today – or indeed, any time after the disastrous consequences of the Leave vote had sunk in (about forty-eight hours after the result) – Britain would overwhelmingly vote Remain.

But they are not being given the chance.

What they face instead is a General Election.

Clearly, Leggy is annoyed by the constant pointing out by everybody of the problems that will be created by Britain’s exit from Europe; the undoing of over 40 years of trade deals, legislation, agreements and so on, the ire of Europe, the possible break-up of the UK (Scotland voted Remain and the N Irish might prefer being part of Europe over being part of Britain) – and the crippling financial repercussions.

So, figuring that since Labour currently appears unelectable and no second party would be able to achieve what they have failed to in the last hundred years, she has clearly decided winning a GE will silence – or at least, reduce – the criticism.

And allow her to get on with the job of totally f***ing up Britain.


What an utter tool.

The irony is that when he stated that even Hitler had never stooped to using chemical weapons – and a reporter reminded him about the HOLOCAUST – he COULD have gotten out of the mess by QUALIFYING his statement.

Had he been better informed and more eloquent, he could have pointed out that his statement was (SORT OF) TRUE.

The fact is, when WW2 got underway, the British government equipped its citizens with gas masks. They informed them that these were only a precaution, as they believed that Hitler would not use gas weapons, since this would force Britain to respond in kind – which was in NO-ONE’S interest.

However this was in fact a monumental BLUFF, given that Britain HAD no gas weapons to speak of. And so, believing the British were incapable of prevarication, he did not use HIS.

Of course, he used PLENTY of gas during the Holocaust – killing millions of gypsies, Poles, Jews, gays, intellectuals and anyone he believed was an enemy of the Third Reich.

But it could reasonably be argued that whilst this monstrous act took place towards the end of the war, it was not strictly speaking a PART of the war – rather a sickening BY-PRODUCT.

Furthermore, the gas was not a WEAPON per se – it was an atrocious EXPEDIENCY.

Thus Spicer’s statement (and clearly, his intent) was kinda TRUE.

Nevertheless, when the reporter brought up the HOLOCAUST, he needed to choose his next words CAREFULLY – not turn into the gibbering pillock he became.

Trump needs a new press secretary.


The other day, I was passing a certain popular fast-food outlet, which had a life-size plastic clown seated on a bench outside.

Quickly, while no-one was watching, I got my wife to sit down and pose next to it.

With her head and hands in a certain position, it looked like he had good reason to be smiling.

I took a picture – and there are SO many reasons why I cannot show it to you!

Incidentally, while I’m on this – why DO junk-food joints insist on making their female staff wear mens’ trousers?


It used to be said that only Rolls-Royce could boast that over half the cars they had ever produced were still in existence.

This was in the days when your chauffeur (one never drove one’s own Rolls-Royce) had to place his jacket over the radiator grill if it Ceased To Proceed (Rolls-Royces never broke down). Then he jogged off to find a phone, after which the Rolls-Royce engineers would arrive, place a tailored car-cover over their fallen charge and spirit it away on a trailer.

And if a panel got dinged, Rolls-Royce would respray the whole car if the paint had faded at all. Insurers were livid, but Rolls-Royce-driving judges shot down their objections.

However, in 1965 all that changed. While their previous models had followed the tradition of plonking an engine onto a chassis and then bolting the body on top, for the first time Rolls-Royce produced a car featuring unitary (monocoque) construction.

Of course, they continued filling the seams between panels with lead, then grinding them flat – making the whole car look like it was pressed out of a single moulding – instead of just using trim, like other volume manufacturers.

And they continued packing the interior with sound-deadening material, so the loudest thing you would hear was the clock.

But despite all that, for the first time ever, Rolls-Royce were making a regular car.

For the first decade, nothing unusual occurred. The cars sold like hot cakes – even John Lennon bought one (then got it a custom paint job). But as the Seventies progressed, something extraordinary happened.

The thing was, the early examples had now dropped in price to the level of a fully-loaded Ford Granada. But the Ford would shed a third of its value as it exited the showroom – then another third after five years – and would only be worth a few hundred in ten, even if it had been looked after – while the Rolls-Royce would still be worth pretty much the same. It was depreciation-proof.

Naturally, there were catches. The Rolls-Royce was seriously thirsty. And thanks to the knock-for-knock system, insurance was costly too. Then there was the maintenance.

However, there were hacks. And low-mileage, mature, full NCB, clean license holders discovered that increasing numbers of engineers knew them. Like, many of its parts were the same as those made for Leyland – just in a different box.

And since the model changed little in fifteen years, you could disguise its age by buying it a pre-’63 non-letter registration plate. Provided it was mundane (XDZ 438, as opposed to MJV 1) it would cost under a hundred pounds. A dodge coach fleet-owners also used.

This resulted in cases like a local primary-school headmaster who, being mature, having a clean license, living just a few miles from his school, having paid off the mortgage and without vices (he did not smoke, drink or gamble) decided in the twilight of his years to ride in comfort and style. Good for him.

But then it got silly. Suddenly every two-bit East End villain had one. Then people in the motor trade began buying damaged-repairable examples that had been rear-ended – and converted them into pickups. I once saw one doing service as a tow truck. Ouch.

Even now, many have had cheap, white resprays and earn money at the weekend, doing weddings.

And the company has been bought by BMW. Imagine what Winston Churchill would think of that.

Anyhoo, I leave you with my way to tell the class of an Englishman; if he refers to a Rolls-Royce as a Royce, he is upper class – a Rolls, he is middle-class – and if he calls it a Roller, he is a working-class oik.

Use it with my blessing.


Who is responsible for the fact that Britain and America are currently circling the drain?

Well, since Leggy May is about to deliver Britain’s SUICIDE NOTE to Europe – and Donald Trump has achieved more bad in less than two months than Barry Obama achieved good in EIGHT YEARS – the answer would seem to be obvious.

But hold on there a minute; if a drunk driver ploughed his car into your life-partner – or a psychotic gunsel blew their head off – would you blame Toyota? Or Smith & Wesson?

NO. It was the HUMAN controlling them what did it. May and Trump are merely TOOLS (particularly in Trump’s case).

The ARCHITECT of these two disasters is… Mr George Wan – sorry, WaLker Bush. Yes, him again. The Monkey.

He said History would judge him – so let us examine the History.

The Middle East has always been a clusterf*** – and while George Bush Snr had the class and wisdom to QUIT after removing Saddam Hussein from Kuwait, his yobbo son was untroubled by either of these qualities.

So, ignoring the UN (and thus exposing their ineffectiveness) he dragged Bambi (Britain’s nice-but-dim Prime Minister at the time) into an operation designed to remove him from the PLANET, claiming he was a threat to Britain and America.

We now know otherwise – but the RESULT of this blunder was to turn the Middle East from a standard clusterf*** into the MONUMENTAL clusterf*** it is today.

A side-effect of which was to ignite a campaign of terror (Paris, San Bernadino, Nice, Orlando, Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray and others) which DOMINATED the year preceding the Brexit election and America’s Choice 2016.

Which created the public FEAR that DIRECTLY led to the situation described in paragraph two of these ramblings.


…is said (erroneously) to be an ancient Chinese curse.

But for two of America’s Late Night chat-show hosts, the current interesting times have proven to be a major BOON.

I am speaking of Mssrs. Colbert and Meyers.

A peculiar thing about American Late Night is its scheduling. While FIVE chat-shows a night is clearly overkill (but that’s Americans for you) it is nonetheless a fact.

On ABC, the snarky Jimmy Kimmel rules. While on CBS, it is Stephen Colbert, followed by James Corden. And on NBC, Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers.

But here is the anomaly; while Colbert and Meyers are solidly topical-political, Fallon and Corden deliver celeb trivia.

So when the first two hosts sign off, a gazillion remotes are activated as the audience follows the stream they prefer.

And in the past, aided by the TRADITION associated with (currently) Fallon’s The Tonight Show, the majority went with the FLUFF.

However when Trump took office, the pendulum SWUNG – BIG TIME.

And for the first time ever, the TOPICAL-POLITICAL boys are now reigning.

This has happened before. In Eighties Britain, during Thatcher’s administration, Channel Four’s late night comedy shows ripped her a new one every night. For YEARS – and a lot of difference it made.

The fact is, watching hated right-wing politicians being made to look utterly ridiculous (which isn’t hard) only serves to please liberals and lefties – it changes NOTHING.



Most people think “Disneyfied” animals – ones that TALK – are fantasies for children. Not so. All animals HAVE the power of speech. They simply choose to HIDE it from us. This is so they don’t have to listen to our complaining. If we knew they can understand us, think what a PAIN it would be for them. “My wife doesn’t understand me”, “Do you HAVE to lick that?” etc. Of course, they don’t mind talking in front of drunks and looneys – who’s going to believe THEM?

In much the same way, men can IRON. We can also cook (how many of the World’s greatest chefs are WOMEN?) clean, hoover, wash up and do laundry. After all, what ARE these things? Cooking is merely the application of heat to raw materials. And any fool can read the washing instructions on a garment. Who do you think DESIGNED washing machines in the first place? As for hoovers – we can handle MOWERS without taking out the flower-beds.

We can do all these things and more – but that doesn’t mean we WANT to. These activities are monumentally TEDIOUS. So, just like the animals, we CONCEAL our abilities. Women, bless ’em, fail to notice the sly smiles we men exchange, when they moan to each other about how HOPELESS we are around the house. This minor slur on our manhoods is a small price to pay for keeping women where they BELONG – in the KITCHEN.

(If THIS one doesn’t get me some comments…)


I would have to travel half-way around the planet to attend one – so it ain’t going to happen. But I offer the following ploy to anyone who can USE it…

First, you hire an actress (or an escort, if you’re not that rich). For the gag to work, she will need to be good-looking and SMART.

After you’ve explained what you need, you both turn up, posing as husband and wife – you in a DJ (dinner jacket) and her looking like a million dollars.

So far so mundane – I’m sure LOADS of guys have done that. But here is where it gets interesting; after you have given it ten minutes to sink in, you split up and mingle.

And this where it takes a TURN; having wrapped herself around you at first – once clear, she begins giving the glad eye to ALL your school-friends.

How well she handles it will depend on her acting abilities and her commitment to the role you’ve given her.

Of course, the REAL fun will be the DENOUEMENT.

Most of these gigs have a band or DJ (disk-jockey this time) so once she has gotten the whole place buzzing – with each guy (and perhaps a couple of girls) separately convinced they have landed themselves a LIVE one (at your expense) – you take the mic and announce that they have all been HAD.

And if you REALLY want to bury them, fit her up with a wire and play the recording on the sound system!

Enjoy, with my compliments.


There are too many examples of words in the Thai language that are SILLY in English, for it to be a coincidence: porn, pee-pee, prik, poo, Phuket – and that’s just the ‘P’s.

Plus, let us not forget the one EVERYONE knows – Bangkok.

But it doesn’t stop there. One of the largest chains of megastores in Thailand is called Big C (as in CANCER).

And our local one has a concession called TUMMOUR!

Think I’m kidding? Here they are…



“…Make You Laugh Out Loud” is an “INVISIBLE” TV SERIES.

At least, its absence from both Wiki and IMDb would suggest so. Even the company (Britain’s Channel Five – the Brexit of TV channels) who apparently finance it are loath to show details of anything but a few random episodes on their website. Indeed, that is all you will find ANYWHERE – a few random episodes.

Yet here in Thailand, Sony are currently stripping what they call Season Three. Meanwhile, I have already watched Season Two (we have only had the Sony Channel here for a couple of weeks, so I may never see Season One) and as far as I can make out, there appear to be about ten episodes per season. Some thirty in all?

But just why Channel Five seem so intent on BURYING this series, I cannot comprehend. From the little I can find out, their scheduling of it seems to have been as half-arsed as their publicity for it – them having screened it as a series of specials.

Anyhoo, if this series shows up on your package, give it a try.

A clips show, it features a commentary-track by “TV’s [these days; mostly radio’s] Iain Lee” with a smattering of interviews with some of those featured in the clips, plus comments from various British comics, all accompanied by corny music from British music libraries (much if not all of which hails from the legendary KPM).

At an hour, it is twice as long as the plethora of other clips shows currently showing on TV (they are CHEAP to make) but the time passes quickly.

Each episode is dedicated to a category of clowning, like “Grannies Make You Laugh Out Loud” – and Stupid Criminals, Stupid Builders, Babies, Cats, Dogs, Puppies, Kittens (the animal eps are best – some having sequels each year) and others.

I do not usually bother with series like these – inane and cheap – but like the Carry On films, this one is hard to resist…


I understand Leggy is currently having a summit with Trump.

Well, she needs to give him ANYTHING he wants (yes, including one of THOSE).

The reason being, right now – Trump needs friends (as does Leggy).

The Latin countries hate him (wall, etc.)

China hates him (Taiwan).

And for obvious reasons, he does not WANT to get too chummy with Russia.

Which just leaves Britain and mainland Europe as important future partners.

But this puts him in the position of someone whose two best friends have just announced they are getting a DIVORCE.

He has to CHOOSE A SIDE.

And that falls between America’s favourite bitch – Britain – and the MESS that is Europe.

Thus Leggy May needs to get IN there before Angela Merkin (The Queen Of Europe) seizes HER chance.

Of course Merkin is left wing, while Leggy is right – which gives her a head start.



Down this column (about a year ago) I wrote a long piece on this subject (and, re-reading my reply to a comment; BOY, was I right about 2016!) You can find it at…

Anyhoo, thinking more about it, I realised that some might accuse me of bias, declaring that religion itself is BENIGN, and cannot be blamed for the repression, control, genital mutilation, homophobia, misogyny, rampant terrorism and many other evils with which it blights our lives – rather, the fault lies with those who DISTORT its messages and use them to justify their appalling deeds.

Yes, but… haven’t we heard that before?

“Guns Don’t Kill People – People Kill People.”

True. And belief in a deity is like that hunk of gun-metal. Inert. Only when you introduce a PERSON to them do they become problematic.

Which proves my point. Unless you are psychotic, killing someone with a knife, baseball bat – or just your hands and feet – is pretty TOUGH. But pointing a gun at them and squeezing the trigger is a whole lot EASIER. And likewise, once you have someone hooked on the “opium” that is religion – they are putty in your hands.

So I am not saying that getting rid of guns and religion would solve all of the World’s ills – people are too greedy and stupid for that – but it would be a damn good START…


Well folks, there were only TWO famous(ish) dead celebs during the last cuppla days of the HELLISH year of 2016 – William Christopher (Father Mulcahy, from M*A*S*H) and Cyril deGrasse Tyson (Neil’s Dad). And three days into 2017 – no MORE.

So let us all hope they END the run…


At least, if you are BRITISH.

At the beginning of this year, there was a two-month period when we lost David Bowie, Keith Emerson, Paul Daniels, Alan Rickman, Lemmie from Motorhead, Sylvia Anderson, Sir Terry Wogan, Ken Adam, Cliff Michelmore, Ed Stewart, Sir George Martin, Douglas Slocombe, Alan Haven and Norman Hudis. And during the same period, America lost Garry Shandling, Tom Mullica, Frank Sinatra Jr and Prince.

On average, that was one late showbiz legend every FOUR DAYS.

But while the year proceeded to lurch from disaster to disaster, as far as the Grim Reaper was concerned things almost returned to normal as, over the next nine months, we said goodbye to Ronnie Corbett, Burt Kwouk, Caroline Aherne, Garry Marshall, Victoria Wood, Gene Wilder, Jimmy Perry, Sir Jimmy Young, Robert Vaughn and Peter Vaughan. Plus a host of others whose passing barely raised one eyebrow, let alone two.

Thus as Christmas loomed, it began to look like the earlier decimation had merely been a statistical BLIP.

Then, BOOM.

In just FOUR DAYS; Carrie Fisher has a “cardiac episode” on a plane and is left barely clinging to life, Rick Parfitt of Status Quo leaves us, followed hours later by George Michael – and then Carrie joins them.


And the year still has THREE DAYS LEFT…

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Thinking again about the above; I understand that being sixty-four means one’s heroes are mostly going to be in their seventies and up, but they were only one year younger LAST year – and two the year before and so on. And the losses then were ROUTINE. No, this year has been DIFFERENT. It is almost as if we are being PREPARED for something…

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

…and now – Carrie’s MUM?! Leaves TWO days and COUNTING…


…should be drunk SLOWLY…

Bad Santa


Donald Trump

The Trumpster is in it again. Having accepted a congratulatory phone call from Taiwan’s President (she’s sixty – but at least a six) he has unwittingly (?) caused an almighty flap in Washington.

Tsai Ing-wen

The reason being that for decades, in order to maintain relations with China, America has played that country’s game of considering the former Formosa (named after a laminate) a Chinese Rogue State.

The absurd position China occupies over the island is long overdue an overhaul – but no-one in Washington is eager to enter THAT game.

However, America’s new President-elect has little love for the giant country that has waged a subtle and successful economic war on The States – and so cares little for China’s camp indignation and fury.

One wonders what those who are currently railing against Trump would say if Theresa “Leggy” May suddenly declared the USA to be a Rogue State of BRITAIN…


So there was this bloke who lived alone – next door to two lesbians.

One day, they popped around to ask if he could fix their washing machine, as it had just sprung a leak and flooded their kitchen.

Being handy, he agreed to give it a try – and after a couple of hours of heaving and straining, managed to repair the faulty appliance.

They asked him how much he wanted for his trouble.

At first, he replied that he would not dream of charging neighbours for such work, but when they insisted on giving him SOMETHING – he paused, grinned and said, “I wanna WATCH.”

They said okay and invited him to return later that night.

At the appointed hour, having spraunced himself up, he knocked on their door. It opened and there stood the women. They presented him with a small box, smiled and closed the door.

He opened the box.

It contained a Rolex.

And it was a knock-off.


Elsewhere in these observations, I have mused on how the success of Donald Trump – like the “Brexit” Leave Campaign – was largely down to the proles’ fear of foreign terrorism. But I accepted that in both cases, there were other factors.

And in the case of Trump – PC was certainly one of them.

Before the Seventies, casual racism, sexism and “homophobia” were, along with other social ills, de rigueur and when Political Correctness arrived, it initially improved things no end.

However, as is often the case with these things, the pendulum swung too far and eventually left people – particularly OLD people – feeling confused, bored and ultimately P*SSED OFF.

Then along came Trump who, despite being a billionaire (or more likely just a millionaire) was solidly BLUE COLLAR.

And as such, he had little time or patience for PC – which many found REFRESHING. So much so, that some folks undoubtedly voted for him not because of what he said – but the down-home way he SAID it.

Which only goes to show that PC can be as damaging to society as foreign terrorism…


It is customary to analyse a year just after it has FINISHED – and this one still has seven weeks to go. However, now the dust APPEARS to have (hopefully) settled, your humble scribe (always ahead of the curve) has decided to get his two penn’orth in FIRST.

The year began with a miserable two-month period where on average a much-loved celebrity passed – every FOUR DAYS.

But the main cause for concern was the latest wave of TERRORISM which has been going on in the West, ever since America accidentally (thanks to the “Star Wars” Con) won the Cold War (1991) and who, needing a NEW Evil Empire to cite as justification (to the World in general and its tax-payers in particular) for maintaining the most powerful military on the planet, decided to nominate the Middle East.

They were sitting on the oil America needed and being factionalized, ill-equipped and ill-trained – how much harm could they cause?

As I predicted, in 1994; Manhattan, 9/11, 2001 (except I thought it would be a suitcase-type “dirty” nuclear bomb).

This inability to understand and assess an enemy goes right back to Pearl Harbor, where BOTH sides under-estimated the other.

Anyhay, with the US having sucked the rest of the West into their mess, France had been suffering FREQUENT terrorist atrocities since late 2014 – but their story went GLOBAL in November 2015, when a bunch of yahoos with Kalashnikovs and suicide vests ran riot amongst Paris’s sports-fans, concert-goers and clubbers.

One hundred and thirty dead, with another two hundred and fifty injured. The number who still wake up screaming is unknown.

Then, in July 2016, a single individual drove a twenty ton truck through Nice’s Bastille Day revellers on the old coast road (I’ve driven along it myself – it’s slow, but delightful) which had been pedestrianized for the day.

Another eighty-six dead and over FOUR hundred maimed.

Then, while this was still fresh in everyone’s mind, two thugs slit the throat of an eighty-five-year-old priest as he was performing Mass, in a small-town church.

Meanwhile, over in the States, about the time the Paris Attacks were happening, a San Bernardino couple who’d had enough weapons in their garage to start a small war – DID so. A one-sided affair, it resulted in thirty-six casualties, including fourteen dead.

And just before the Nice incident, another lone individual fired two hundred rounds from a legally-purchased SIG Sauer and likewise Glock into a hundred people in an Orlando disco – killing half of them.

Of course, the NUMBER of people killed in these sorts of crimes is minimal, compared to those killed in traffic accidents. But terrorism is about the PSYCHOLOGICAL impact, not the numbers. And thus, by mid-2016, this sudden ramping up of terrorist activities in the West had people SCARED.

Enter Farage and Trump.

Whenever a political upset occurs, “experts” like to analyse what went WRONG. The problem is, they forget that while THEY may be complex people, the average citizen is pretty SIMPLE. Thus the reasons they do things are pretty simple too.

And in the case of Brexit and the 2016 US Election, they saw votes for Leave and Trump as a way to firm up their nations’ borders and prevent more mayhem.

Oh sure, there were a myriad other issues, but their fear of terrorism was a BIG part of their reasoning in both cases.

And it is SAD that neither leaving Europe nor voting in Trump will actually HELP in this aim. Most of the instigators of these heinous acts were CITIZENS – not immigrants.

The only ACTUAL way these deeds can be reduced in number is for the anti-terrorist agencies to continue doing what they do; quietly infiltrate any groups who look like they might contain radicals – and NAIL said radicals before they can act.

It may be a less glamorous solution than bombing the crap out of the “homelands” of the terror groups that inspire the home-grown extremists – however it is ultimately a lot more successful.

But simple people seek simple answers to the fears that dominate their lives. And as I have discussed in earlier ramblings, they were not about to SHARE their fears with POLLSTERS. Which is why America faces at least four years of Trump and his Incorrigibles.

Although thanks to its High Court, Britain could YET pull itself back from the brink.

Yes, the last little bit of this APPALLING year may provide new HOPE, if the UK’s Supreme Court decides wisely.

However, now only a MIRACLE (or maybe a wedged Big Mac) can save America.

Lotsa luck, guys – you’re gonna NEED it.



This proposition sprang from Nigel’s recent fawning exercises at Trump’s rallies.

Not surprisingly, the suggestion has been met with DERISION by both Farage – who has refused to involve himself with Britain’s ruling Conservative party – and the British government, who have declared the (on and off) UKIP leader to be an “irrelevance”.

However, something FAR FROM irrelevant is the fact that only a few months ago, Britain’s Parliament was forced to debate having Trump BANNED FROM ENTERING the UK – as an undesirable alien!

At that time, a determination on the issue was SHELVED – doubtless to allow HMG time to see if the man became POTUS.

And, well …now he HAS.

Which means that the already-beleaguered (thanks to Brexit – which happened for exactly the same reason the US elected Trump) British government is soon going to have to address the MONUMENTALLY EMBARRASSING prospect of whether or not to BLOCK ENTRY – to the President Of The United States Of America!

And you thought 2016 was a ridiculous year…


Donald Trump

…as 2016 President-Elect Donald Trump (I can’t believe I just typed that) would undoubtedly say.

A week ago, in this very column, I typed the following –

And according to the then-latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, his “invisibles” have numbered EXACTLY my predicted six percent!

We have CLUELESS POLLSTERS – and foreign terrorism – to thank for both Brexit and now …America’s next POTUS.

Gawdelpus us all.


…is that, as House MD opined – people LIE.

They lie to their enemies, their friends – even themselves.

And they have NO qualms about lying to POLLSTERS – as was recently demonstrated, during the Brexit fiasco.

The thing is, no-one wants to appear racist, petty or greedy – even to a complete stranger they will never meet again.

Case in point; back in Seventies Britain, Japanese cars acquired a wholly undeserved reputation for RELIABILITY. The truth was, they were no more reliable than the Fords, GMs and certainly the Leyland mass-produced cars of the time.

However, the devious Japanese marketers realised that when a British rep, service engineer, area manager or whomever is spending HOURS in his car, buzzing up and down motorways – having an FM stereo radio-cassette with four speakers instead of an AM radio with just ONE – and velour seats instead of plastic – plus electric windows, heated seats, you get the idea – becomes a BIG DEAL.

And so they put “L” model equipment in their entry-level models, “XL” in their “L”s, “GXL” in their “XL”s – again, you get the idea.

But when girls with clipboards at motor shows asked those reps, engineers et al WHY they preferred the rice-burner to the home-made products, they felt SILLY admitting it was the TOYS – so they all said the first thing that came into their heads that would make them LOOK GOOD.

And this is why the UK pollsters had NO IDEA that the British were scared sh*tless about foreign terrorism – and figured escaping Europe would help SAVE them from it; give them control of their borders.

Which, across The Pond, is exactly why many support TRUMP.

Of course, these poor deluded saps have not realised that most of the terrorists are CITIZENS, not aliens (“…the call came from INSIDE the house.”)

And NONE of them are going to admit to POLLSTERS that they FEAR “foreigners” – it might make them look RACIST. So they LIE.

In the case of the UK’s Leavers, they gave their reasons as financial – and some claimed they would vote (and to exit pollsters, HAD voted) REMAIN.

While RIGHT NOW, stateside, people who have every intention of voting for Trump are telling pollsters they will be placing their X next to Old Ma Clinton.

Wouldn’t YOU? Only an ARSEHOLE would admit to ANYONE that they will be voting for The Orange One.

And so Hillary has booked a barge loaded with fireworks to sit on the Hudson – then LET RIP on command, at some point after the closing of the polls.

Naturally, such displays do not happen spontaneously; they require a lot of organisation (and money) – and permission from the NY Mayor’s Office – so she HAD to set up the affair in advance.

But THIS reporter believes her actions will prove to be PREMATURE – not to mention deeply EMBARRASSING.

Because all across America, there are a whole BUNCH of people who, once again, are going to make fools of the pollsters – because they asked questions the public were NOT prepared to answer TRUTHFULLY.

This is BEYOND DOUBT. The only question LEFT is – HOW MANY POINTS are they worth?

Right now, Trump lags Hillary by five points. However, how many “INVISIBLE” points does he have?

I predict SIX.

And give you (I can’t believe I’m actually saying this) – PRESIDENT TRUMP.


I see the tedious Zimmerman has slighted the Nobel committee, who were dumb enough to award him their prize for Literature.

I have no idea why, but would LIKE to think it was IN PROTEST at them giving the Peace Prize to President Barry Obama before he had really DONE anything – and President Woody Wilson after – well, you need to READ THIS (newly updated) piece…

However, given this is Bob, I somewhat DOUBT it…


…at least, none of… …hey look, you should only read this if you like The Blacklist AND are up to date with the American transmissions of same – okay? If not, naff off.

So where was I? Oh yes, PLENTY of people get killed in this series – but the ones we LIKE always come BACK.

This runs totally counter to the norm, where major characters regularly get knocked off due to contract negotiation breakdowns, substance abuse, personal issues – or they got head-hunted for a bigger rôle in another show (always a gamble, that one).

At various times during the last four years; Tom Keen has been shot by Liz, Tom has shot smugbastard Solomon, Dembe (Red’s right hand man) has gotten shot by Pee-wee Herman (Paul Reubens) and Liz has had an ARDUOUS death.

But NONE of them ACTUALLY DIED!! Tom recovered, Solomon just disappeared – leaving a pool of blood (he will return in the spin-off) Dembe also recovered (it would take a BAZOOKA to kill him; he is a BIG MAN) and Liz’ death was entirely BOGUS (staged, to fool Red). 

And now, because of that, Red has shot “Mister” Kate Kaplan. Yet while, like all the others, he is a PRO using a GUN at POINT BLANK RANGE – as he walked away, we clearly saw her scrawny little hand TWITCHING.

I am just waiting to see Red walk down a street and a safe falls onto his head – then a truck swerves and flattens it and him – then a sink-hole opens up and swallows the whole pavement – under which a lava flow…

…and yet STILL he turns up in the next episode, looking dapper as ever, with that BLOODY fedora of his…



I wrote the following a YEAR ago – BEFORE Brexit…

This ex-pat British writer is lucky enough to have been born some eighteen months AFTER the date he will qualify for the new Flat Rate UK Pension – and about three years BEFORE the date when that qualification will be increased to 66.

But that ends the good news. The bad news is he resides in a “non-reciprocal” country.

You see, many moons ago, HMG dreamed up a stonking wheeze; FREEZE the pensions of those lucky enough to escape the cold, wet misery of the Uke at the amount they get when they first receive it.

But there was a catch; they had this agreement with a number of countries that pensions would be paid by the pensioners’ “host” country. Thus if a couple retired to southern Europe or Florida, their pension would be paid by that country’s government. And conversely, a couple from those countries would receive their pensions from HMG, if they retired in the UK.

Which was great for HMG, since only people with senile dementia would want to retire FROM those places TO Britain.

However, while those countries would pay annual pension hikes to the British ex-pats, they would naturally expect the same deal for THEIR people – so HMG could not get away with treating those pensioners the same as THEIR OWN. Boo-hoo.

Although while none of the various pressure groups set up to try to REVERSE this rip-off have so far gotten anywhere, things are likely to CHANGE if Britain decides to LEAVE the EU, since the countries in southern Europe – where MOST ex-pat pensioners end up – would suddenly STOP paying the UK’s pensioners. Meaning HMG would take over – WITHOUT the annual hikes. Give it a few years and inflation would start to BITE – and so would those MANY ex-pat pensioners.

Sadly, too late to help THIS ex-pat pensioner; up to two years for the referendum – then a few more years for the dozy old buggers to realize their money is slowly buying less – plus a couple MORE years for them to start DOING something about it. Add to that however long it took for HMG to act and your humble scribe will likely be ASH.

Of course, HMG’s Flat Rate pension is ONLY good news for us ex-pat Brits. Predictably, it will DROP overall money for the vast majority of UK pensioners stuck in Blighty. As will EXTENDING the qualifying period, thus punishing those who retired early.

All of which is as sick as HMG’s RAISING the AGE of qualification; by a year, every five years, is their goal.

Naturally, a CARING, INTELLIGENT government would be LOWERING it by a year – EVERY year – to reduce Britain’s number one problem; UNEMPLOYMENT.

But they would rather DISTORT the figures for life expectancy, by including those for infant deaths a hundred years ago – when they were CHRONIC – and those who died in TWO WORLD WARS – so as to artificially LOWER the AVERAGE number for that time.

Then they continue the APPARENT rise since then – into the future, making it LOOK as though today’s twenty-somethings are likely to live well into their NINETIES.

Which is bollocks, of course. The TRUE life expectancy of Brits is 79 for men and 82 for women. And in the future, it is unlikely to rise more than a year or two (provided the UK’s smokers continue to be allowed to VAPE) – as in the past, it has only risen a year or two, mostly due to the Fifties inoculation programme (although if the scare-mongers manage to persuade parents to DENY their kids those inoculations, that situation could REVERSE).

But then, HMG are neither caring NOR intelligent – as they have spent the last seventy years clearly DEMONSTRATING…

…well, Brexit HAPPENED. And when the FALLOUT begins, HMG will have a MAJOR problem; some of those EU ex-pats will be forced to RETURN to the UK and when they do, the financial impact will be STAGGERING.

Suddenly, a whole raft of people will not only be entitled to their full pensions – but likely full RENT allowance (and UK rents are MASSIVE) – with huge MEDICAL costs to boot.

Of course, HMG will try every dirty trick in the book; like screwing them for the money they got for their villas and condos when they left their Places In The Sun.

However, by then, the SMART people will have BLOWN all that on new furniture, tellies, cars, paying off their kids’ credit cards, et al.

So ultimately, the bill will be WAY higher than if they simply pay ALL ex-pats their FULL pensions with NO MORE F***ING ABOUT!


The Square Academic Cap. Usually worn with a gown. Both black.

When I was a kid in Sixties England, high-school teachers still wore these. They were considered to be like the wigs and gowns worn by the legal profession; affording credibility to the wearer.

However, as the decade wore on, their usage died out.

But then, they became revived among STUDENTS – to be hired and worn on Graduation Day. This practice came over from America and like in America, it was accompanied by the tradition of having a group photo taken where everyone would, with gay abandon, THROW their mortarboards into the air.

mortarboard throwing

However now, the University of East Anglia (in Norwich – where the definition of a virgin is a girl who can run faster than her brother) has BANNED the practice, claiming Health & Safety as the reason – “You could have someone’s EYE out with that!”

But the TRUTH is that such injuries are as rare as rocking-horse poop – the REAL reason is that those who hire out the caps and gowns got miffed at the DAMAGE caused to the mortarboards upon landing.

Which is a bit RICH given they charge about fifty POUNDS for their hire – which HAS to be more than the COST of the damn things.



How about this as a motto for Mensa?


(It means “I’m surrounded by idiots”)


Red Dwarf fridge - JPEG

[UPDATE!] Actually, no – I belatedly looked it up.

It turns out that “smeg” – the all-purpose profanity used on “Red Dwarf” (derived from “smegma” which means… YOU can look THAT up) – has no less than FIVE ACRONYMIC applications, one of which is Smalterie Metallurgiche Emiliane Guastalla (which translates as the Emiliane metallurgical enamel works of Guastalla) who have been around since 1948, making (among other things) up-market fridges.

These days, they have gone RETRO – and this example just HAPPENS to be RED!

So now you know!


It’s sport.


Henry Ford must have really HATED his son.

Firstly, the old bugger named him EDSEL. Does NO-ONE remember their childhood? You do NOT call a kid something that will get them BEATEN at school. Berk.

Of course, if the boy had any gumption, he would have told everyone his name was ED.

Then if pressed, he could have gone with the traditional Edward, or the more American Edwin – or even the classic Edmund.

Provided he had kept his driving license, passport and other official documents hidden, only his wife and a number of bureaucrats would ever have known his dark secret.

But even after the man prematurely DIED, his misfortune continued.

In 1957, with a HUGE blast of publicity, Ford named the company’s latest product after him – the FORD EDSEL…

Ford Edsel original

Now this COULD have been the man’s saving. After all, Enzo Ferrari named one of HIS models after HIS late son, Dino.

However, there were two major differences between Dino and Edsel.

Number one; Dino is a cool name. And two; the Dino Ferrari was a SWEETHEART of a car – a MAJOR popular and financial success.

While Edsel is a TOILET of a name – and the Ford model which bears it stands as The Greatest Automotive Disaster In History.

Even before it was launched, men claimed its radiator grill reminded them of a lady’s downstairs bits (although, having spent a lot of time down there myself, I don’t SEE it) and in matriarchal America, this scared the CRAP out of the vehicle’s potential customers…

Ford Edsel

Then came the launch itself. After the massive hype – which ANY car would have had trouble living up to – the design faults, unreliability and overpricing ensured that the car would forever be consigned to the CRAPPER.

“The Wrong Car At The Wrong Time” and “The Aim Was Right, But The Target Moved” were just two of the apologies offered up for its monumental failure.

But ironically, while that damn NAME is now a byword for commercial disaster, the remaining examples – both the cars themselves and the toys that accompanied it – can be worth a FORTUNE.

And it is not hard to see why…

Ford Edsel Pacer 1958

Oh yes, some of the sexier variants now fetch over a hundred GRAND.

And even the less glamorous examples are worth SOMETHING, given that less than ten thousand of them survive.

So maybe old Ed has had the last laugh after all.


If two girls are dancing together, they attract guys – but if two GUYS…


Right now, America’s Republican Party must be feeling even sicker than Boris Johnson.

Because in Britain, the Tories managed to get rid of Bozo in just a couple of DAYS – something which the GOP has FAILED to do to The Donald in over a YEAR!

And that sick feeling HAS to be compounded by the fact that while Johnson has been a professional politician for FIFTEEN YEARS – seven as MP for (US: Representative from) Henley, eight as Mayor of London and currently another as MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip…

…Trump has merely served as a HOTELIER.


Satirical comedy. A PR puke rises through Britain’s political system to become its virtual dictator.

Much has been written and said about this film; it was devised (and ultimately funded) by David Frost – initially scripted by John Cleese and Graham Chapman (who wrote much of “Monty Python’s Flying Circus”) – and starred Peter Cook, who added much to the writing.

It has also been said – both then and since – that Rimmer is a thinly disguised satire on Frost himself, created by Cook.

However, this writer disputes that. Certainly Cook later claimed it to be true. And it is also true that the two men had something of a love-hate relationship, with Frost loving Cook and Cook hating Frost (Frost always wanted to be a performer – but lacked the ability).

Nonetheless, while Cook may have intended his performance to ape Frost, it seems to have only succeeded in Cook’s own head.

The fact is, his acting was much as it always was, in films. The late comedy actor/director Mel Smith has described it as, “a sort of non-acting acting style – which isn’t really a style at all – he was always just slightly removed from it – detached.”

But this is not to belittle Cook’s performance. In those days, the man was gorgeous – and when he is onscreen, it is impossible to take your eyes off him.

No, the thing that did for this film was the very thing it was about – the British political system.

In those days, film and television companies were forced to lay off political satire during the run-up to a general election, for fear of Undue Influence. Ironically, this had killed Frost’s “That Was The Week That Was” in 1964, which had seen the beginning of Harold Wilson’s career.

And it killed “…Rimmer” at the end of that career.

This writer was a young man living in London, when the film was being made. He looked forward to it eagerly.

But in the event, it did not emerge until after the 1970 election, by which time it was irrelevant.

Imagine a film today (late June, 2016) starring John Goodman as a blustering showman – a property tycoon and reality show host, with designs on the US presidency… you get the idea.

Now imagine that same film released next March.

In the event, Wilson lost the election due to a “pirate” radio station called Radio Northsea International, which broadcast propaganda to SE England, despite the best efforts of a corrupt government minister called John Stonehouse (Wiki him).

However, it is unlikely that “…Rimmer” would have made a lot of difference to the result; Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 911” exposed the ineptitude and corruption of Bush, but failed to prevent his re-election, in 2004.

All the delay meant was that one of the best films of the late Sixties ended up being buried. And given the pace of that decade, when the film was finally released, it was little more than a curio.

Which is what it remains today – although now it is also something of a time-capsule.

But there is still much to enjoy here, including the aforementioned enigmatic performance of Peter Cook – and fine turns by a roster of Sixties comedy acting talent, including Ronnie Fraser, Denholm Elliot and Arthur Lowe.

Plus a cameo by playwright Harold Pinter who bizarrely, actually does play a character much like that of David Frost…


Much controversy has been generated by the Redskins’ logo. Many Native Americans find it offensive. Here it is…

Washington Redskins logo

Okay, so how about this British person with NO interest in British, let alone American sports, laying the matter to rest?

Here is MY suggestion for a new Redskins logo…


You’re welcome.


The two words “job creation” are now part of every political stump speech, but the two words you will NEVER hear from a politician are “full employment” – WHY? Buckle up…

To illustrate the answer, we need to invent a small town. Let us call it Anytown. It has 1,000 jobs and 990 workers, meaning when a worker needs a job, they have ten to choose from. This creates a situation where employers are vying for staff, producing high wages and good working conditions.

But then a company sheds twenty workers.

Overnight, the situation CHANGES. Now, when a job is advertised, TEN applicants turn up. This enables ALL companies to immediately LOWER wages – and working conditions.

And all it took was a 2% drop in the number of available positions.

Now as all grown-ups know, politicians and business-owners are inextricably linked – often, they are one and the same. Thus it can be seen why politicians DREAD the concept of full employment.

In Britain, the balance tipped in the early Seventies. Thanks to early automation and forays into “outsourcing” – suddenly there became fewer vacancies open than there were people to fill them. At which point, Britain began its slow descent into the huge steaming pile of crap it is neck-deep in today.

And while the British Party remains in power, nothing will change. A SECOND party is required.

Elsewhere in these columns I have described the phenomenon of the British Party, but since you are HERE – a recap.

For the last CENTURY, Britain has been ruled by a single party. It has two wings; Labour and Tory.

In theory they are TWO “opposing” parties, but over the last hundred years each have steadfastly refused to “out” each other’s sleaze and corruption (use “unparliamentary language”) and every time their wing was in power, moved the electoral boundaries to benefit them.

This last would be fine if the next ruling wing moved them BACK, but they merely move MORE boundaries to benefit THEM.

The net result of which has been to establish the “safe seat” system, where either wing of the British Party can rule with about 40% of the popular vote, but any second party would require a whopping SIXTY.

In this writer’s (sadly, long) lifetime, it has been tried twice. And both attempts crumbled to dust.

In the Eighties, the Gang Of Four got about 25% of the vote – barely less than Labour received – but while Labour ended up with hundreds of safe seats, the Alliance party received fewer than the fingers of a clumsy sawmill operator.

And as they always do, the British public bleated about this obvious corruption – but did nothing.

Then, some 25 years later, along came Sell-out Cleggy (“I’m sorry, I’m sorry, I’m so, so, sorry…”) – about whom I have ALSO written in these columns…

Perhaps, in another quarter-century, it will be third time lucky.


If Trump actually ends up as POTUS 45 – WHATEVER he does, at least he will never have to worry about becoming known as The Worst President America Ever Had.

That position is already irrevocably FILLED.

By one George Wan… sorry, WaLker Bush.


…There isn’t any. I thank you.

Oh – you want more? Okay. For centuries, psychiatrists and other quacks have made fortunes convincing people that interpretation of dreams can reveal important facts about their inner psyches.

All of which is bogus.

When we sleep, our higher brain – the “conscious” – shuts down, allowing our lower brain – the “subconscious” – to PLAY (if the lower brain shut down as well, we would stop BREATHING).

Now freed from its mundane duties, the lower brain goes walkabout.

And as it stumbles around our memory banks, it pulls out images, emotions and concepts in an entirely RANDOM manner, occasionally stringing them together into a vaguely narrative form.

And it is these ramblings that we call dreams. Of course, most of the jumble makes no sense, but when it does, we remember it when we wake (particularly if the dream occurred shortly before waking).

But it’s a bit like that infinite number of monkeys. If they bang away mindlessly on those typewriters for long enough, one will knock out something that might pass for a Hollywood screenplay – which would explain “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter”.

So when you wake, having just committed an unspeakable act with your mother, don’t rush to the Yellow Pages looking for a shrink.

You don’t have a PROBLEM – it was just the random wanderings of your unfettered subconscious.

And if you allow this inane drivel from the Haunted Wing of your grey matter to worry you, you DESERVE the drivel said shrink will unload all over YOU.



These days, Bill is in the news a LOT. But while I occasionally glance through what has been said, I find ZILCH about something that is CENTRAL to the issue – the way things WERE during the times his “offences” took place.

Of course, there are those who would say that wrongdoing is wrong, no matter WHEN it was done.

But this is horse-feathers. The list of deeds done by famous people in the past which would horrify today, but which were fine at the time, is INFINITE. Sex with teens, slave-trading, bootlegging and umpteen war-crimes for a start.

And Bill’s appear to be that he had sex with girls – and gave at least some of them Quaaludes.

However back in the late Sixties and early Seventies, the use of this relaxant (sold as Mandrax in the UK) was COMMONPLACE.

Indeed, the drug only started getting clamped down on in the middle Seventies, finally becoming illegal in the early Eighties – although its underground manufacture continued, until it faded from the scene in the early Nineties.

And when Bill was “in his prime” so was “Free Love” – man. Oh yes, “ludes” and “mandies” were a MAJOR part of the Hippie scene.

The reason WHY is easy to understand if you were THERE (as this writer was). You see, during those late Sixties and early Seventies, everywhere young girls looked, they were told they were part of the New/Now/Next/Me Generation – and the Sexual Revolution.

Movies and TV were PLASTERED with images of Free Love.

Thus the peer-pressure on these girls to dive into this new society was immense. The problem was, most of them had been brought up by parents who were part of the FIFTIES generation – easily the most REPRESSIVE period of the Twentieth Century.

And as a result, these late Sixties and early Seventies “chicks” found themselves ACHING to let go – but held back by their upbringing.

So at this time, many would ASK their dates if they had Quaaludes, which they then took EAGERLY. They did not have to be RUFIED.

Quaaludes were like condoms; all guys who considered themselves to be “players” HAD them.

Also, after more than a decade of “control” The Pill became far easier to obtain during this period – no questions, no age limit.

Plus AIDS was years away and the latest generation of antibiotics could take care of most other STDs.

And so it was that the late Sixties and early Seventies became for many a modern Sodom And Gomorrah, the only RULES imposed by the party-goers.

But all parties have to come to an end – and then come the regrets.

And with the passage of time – and a whole new set of STANDARDS in place – it is understandable how today, some of those now-grown-up WOMEN might view the things they did back then.

Of course, most would prefer to FORGET their drug-fuelled excesses and put those days behind them. A dodgy shag is just that – let it go.

But if your memories include an encounter with a CELEBRITY…

Which is where Bill comes in.

His alleged exploits began in 1965 – the year his TV career took off with “I Spy” – and apparently ran right through to 2008. But then, old habits and attitudes die hard.

He is clearly a product of an ERA.

Now although I was there during the period, I was obviously not there when Cosby was – or was not – partaking of the opportunities presented by the climate of that time. So I do not KNOW whether he is a VILLAIN – or just UNLUCKY to have been caught up in a mess.

I am merely trying to throw some light and texture onto a scene that young people today cannot possibly understand, attributing coeval standards to a period that passed by before they were even BORN.

And I am betting that MANY OTHER celebrities have packed go-bags for the time when THEIR past “misdeeds” catch up with them.

In the meantime, here IS Bill Cosby, doing standup – IN 1965…



This KINDA follows on from the end of the piece on Pop and Dance…

… which bemoans the lack of MELODY in today’s music. So where does Morricone figure in this? Read on, reader…

You are probably familiar with Ennio Morricone as that guy who wrote the scores for those “spaghetti westerns” in the Sixties, right?

But he was much more.

In fact, Morricone had already established his spaghetti-western style when he’d done the backing for a cowboy-style country record a few years earlier and merely extended it, when he wrote the scores for “A Fistful Of Dollars”, “For A Few Dollars More”, “The Good, The Bad And The Ugly” and “Once Upon A Time In The West”.

But these films are just four of around four HUNDRED films that were scored by Ennio, from 1962 right up to the present, which include ALL genres of movie, from romance and drama, through horror to farce.

And which, using his collaborators – Bruno Nicolai; arranger and conductor (who has a number of scores to HIS credit) – Alassandro; whistles – and the great Edda Dell’Orso, whose passionate, three-octave vocals enhanced almost all of Ennio’s scores from the mid-sixties to the mid-seventies – run through all genres of MUSIC.

Back in the late Sixties, when the legal wrangles were settled (the makers of “Yojimbo” sued over “Fistful” and the producer of “Fistful” sued over “Dollars More”) and Leone’s first three movies opened outside Italy, Hollywood recognised Morricone’s genius and welcomed him into their number with awards and commissions (they even offered him a villa in Bel-Air, which he declined).

But what no-one outside of Italy (apart from a few film-nuts like this scribbler) knows, is that Morricone has a SLEW of music, that enhanced a plethora of (mostly unremarkable) films, to his credit. And they include some of the most beautiful melodies you will ever hear. Which brings us back to the point this writer made at the top. These pieces were written in the Sixties and Seventies.

And therein lies the problem. As stated in the piece on Pop and Dance, modern music first emerged immediately after WW1. And most of the great melodies – tunes that get inside your brain and which you find yourself humming or whistling – were written by the likes of Cole Porter and George Gershwin, during the Twenties and Thirties.

Still more was written after, but as you go through the Forties, Fifties, Sixties and Seventies – the flow of great MELODIES lessens. Until in the Eighties, it all but DRIES UP.

Oh sure, there were some great SOUNDS around in the Eighties, but most were based on complex CHORD-CHANGES – not melody.

How many GREAT TUNES can YOU think of, that were written after 1980?

The problem is with the format of Western music. It uses just twelve notes – seven white ones and five black. And any melody that is going to sound “right” has to have logical PROGRESSIONS – not just be random notes. Which is somewhat limiting.

As far back as 1964, when John Barry first played the opening three notes of “Goldfinger” to lyricists Leslie Bricusse and Anthony Newley, they both simultaneously sang, “…wider than a mile!” This was because “Moon River” shares the same opening three notes – albethey phrased differently.

These days, to avoid charges of plagiarism, a composer has to make sure that no FOUR successive notes of their melodies coincide with another. And after NINETY YEARS of compositions, which have been greedily assimilated by movies, stage musicals, radio and television – not to mention the Pop record industry – that’s TOUGH.


So if YOU want to hear great melodies you haven’t heard before – go to YouTube and punch in “Ennio Morricone Edda Dell’Orso”. Then listen to ALL of the FORTY-ODD entries listed. And enjoy them.

Because they may be the LAST NEW (to YOU) melodies – THAT YOU WILL EVER HEAR!!


It began with David Bowie – then, in ten weeks, it has included Keith Emerson, Paul Daniels, ​Alan Rickman, Lemmie, Sylvia Anderson, Terry Wogan, Ken Adam, Cliff Michelmore, Ed Stewart, Frank Sinatra Jr., Sir George Martin, Tom Mullica, Douglas Slocombe and Alan Haven.


Now I’m OLD, is it going to be like this CONTINUOUSLY??


Evolution was invented over a hundred years ago, by Charles Dance.

He noted that some horses had grown tall, so they could reach the berries in tall trees.

This meant they got healthier – and they passed their jeans on to their young. They were called Giraffes.

Humans have done this as well. Supermarkets were first invented by Tess Coe and so that food would get cycled, new stocks were put at the back of the shelves.

However tall people could reach the fresher food, so also became healthier and more likely to pass their jeans on to their young.

This is why people have been getting taller since supermarkets opened.


Since almost ANY American can run for POTUS, the ballot forms have to have a “write name in” panel at the bottom of the list of “serious” candidates.

This is called Democracy.

Thus inevitably, Mickey Mouse, Alfred E. Neumann, Howard Stern and other sillies collect significant numbers of votes in every election.

This too is called Democracy.

However, the democratic process (usually) eliminates the possibility of fringe, extremist and outright looney candidates from actually gaining office, as they do not receive enough votes.

But this year, it is increasingly looking like that process may FAIL in the USA. There is now a very REAL possibility that Donald Trump could WIN.

Which HAS to be akin to Mr Mouse HIMSELF winning!

And if Trump IS nominated, voters will not even have to write a name on the ballot form – it will already be PRINTED there.

Furthermore, if elected, The Donald can take solace from the fact that no matter how badly he screws things up, he will NEVER be known as The Worst American President Ever. That boat has already sailed.

I give you Mr George Wan… sorry, WaLker Bush.


When your son asks you why he needs an education – show him this picture…

education rocks!

When your daughter asks you why she needs an education – show her this picture…

education rocks!


Incredibly, numerophile is not a recognised word, even though its antonym – numerophobe – IS (although you’ll be hard-stretched to find it in a dictionary). So its journey to recognition begins HERE…

Back in 2009, I purchased a nice digital clock (I even bought a second, to replace it when it conked out – which so far, it hasn’t).

In bright LED 7SDs (which dim between 22:00 and 07:00) it gives you the time (in 24-hour format) plus (with no unnecessary zeros) the day of the week (modern style, with Monday as day 1) then the day of the month and the month itself.

It even gives you the temperature (in degrees centigrade) accurately, thanks to its built-in thermocouple.

Meaning that once every seven years, it can show 22:22, 2, 2, 2, 22.

This is because, on average, the second of February only falls on a Tuesday that often (in fact; every six years, five years, six years and eleven years – the whole repeated every twenty-eight years).

And a few days ago, it did just that – although I had to crank up the aircon to make it happen.

The last time this occurred was shortly after I bought the clock, back in 2010. The previous time had been in 1999 – and the next will be in 2021. Then 2027. After which comes the eleven-year gap – so 2038.

But hopefully I’ll be DEAD by then (otherwise, I’ll be eighty-five – and no-one wants that – unless they’re eighty-four – and perhaps not even then).

Now this is actually a lot like those old cars, where the mileometer (another word only SOME dictionaries acknowledge) turns all of its digits from a row of nines to a row of zeros, every 100,000 miles (one wonders how many drivers have piled into the car in front whilst watching this phenomenon).

The thing is, when the long-awaited Magic Event takes place, the bonnet does not suddenly fly up and the wheels fall off (unless you’re driving a CLOWN car). While it may be fascinating for the driver, the vehicle is oblivious to it.

And likewise my clock; it did not issue smoke and rise majestically into the air, either this time or the last.

But it was still great to see 222222222 on the machine again – albeit for only a few seconds (at which point, the temperature drifted off).

However, I’m not a numerologist (the twits who believe numbers actually HAVE Magical Powers – THAT word is easy to find) so that was as far as it went.

Nevertheless, I’ll be there again in 2021!


I recall a TV show where a young person was talking with an elderly person and then they said something which assumed the elder was a racist. At which point, said elder stopped them and said, “Now hang on, you’re assuming because I’m old I must be a racist – that makes YOU an AGEIST.”

It was a great line (which is why I remember it) but the truth is that these days, for that to be true the person would have to be over 70.

I’m 63 and a Child Of The Sixties – and we INVENTED anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-homophobia, etc.

Then came the Children Of The Seventies, who proceeded to mess everything up, with their Political Correctness – leaving everyone confused and paranoid.

But what has this to do with recordable DVDs?

Well, it occurred to me there is a parallel to be drawn; imagine DVD-players are white folks and recordable DVDs are immigrants – while OLD DVD-players CLAIM to play ALL disks, the fact is when it comes to recordable DVDs – they just don’t LIKE them!

All my MODERN players are FINE with recordable DVDs – but my old machines bicker, act irrationally and frequently REJECT them…


Ask any British school-child (who has been paying attention) when World Wars One and Two began and ended and they will say 1914-18 and 1939-45.

But put the same question to an American kid and you will get 1916-18 and 1941-45.

And in Spain, China or Japan – yet more alternative start dates.

While Peninsula Malaysia and South Korea will generate different END dates.

And of course, plenty of countries were sensible enough to stay OUT of the conflicts altogether.

Which is remarkably similar to World War Three.

Inevitably, America started it when they accidentally WON the Cold War. This theoretical conflict served both the American and Russian governments well, allowing them to justify maintaining gigantic militaries, both to the rest of the World – and their own taxpayers.

But it all came crashing down in 1991, when America overplayed its hand. They had invented a fictitious high-tech ICBM defence system called the Strategic Defence Initiative (“Star Wars”) and Russia, with its Communist system – which fails to reward initiative, resulting in technological stagnation – had no answer to it.

So the USSR GAVE UP – leaving Washington to invent a NEW Evil Empire.

And so they nominated the Middle East, who were sitting on the OIL that by now, America desperately needed – with their own oil barely covering a quarter of their consumption.

The Middle East was low-tech, splintered and disorganised, so what was the worst that could happen? They found out in 2001 (“9/11”).

But while that (reversed) date might be thought of by Americans as World War Three’s start date, like with the two previous major conflicts, other countries differ.

In Spain, it was 2004 (“11-M” – the Madrid Train Bombings).

In Britain, 2005 (“7/7” – either way round – the London Bombings).

And in France – ALL of last year.

Thanks America – here’s another nice mess you’ve gotten us into.

Naturally, Washington would claim that the above (and many more) events were merely isolated, uncoordinated terrorist atrocities – not a WAR.

But as usual, they would be WRONG. To understand why, we need to understand the NATURE of war.

In the Nineteen-Teens, it was low-tech, all-embracing, brutal trench warfare – culminating with the Great American Plague. And thanks to stupid, greedy politicians failing to tie things up properly, it was only around twenty years before World War Two kicked off.

But this time, thanks to better tech – long-range bombers, rockets, submarines, radar, code-breakers and ultimately, nuclear bombs – it was a very different experience.

And with the gap between that conflict and the current one having stretched to around HALF A CENTURY, it is inevitable that this war is a QUANTUM LEAP from the last.

Back in the Sixties, we imagined that World War Three would be all nuclear devices and laser weaponry. However, a nuclear war would eliminate every living creature larger than a cockroach. And laser weapons are impractical – their uses are limited and they require GIGANTIC power-supplies.

No, following the disastrous and bloody Vietnam War, America invented a whole range of high-tech “stealth” weaponry that could drop a bomb down an enemy’s chimney, without even disturbing the next door neighbours’ TV-watching.

But after having used a slew of these very EXPENSIVE toys, America has barely made a dent in the enemy’s “homeland” forces.

However, it is not them that WE have to fear.

Would-be President (it could happen) Donald Trump believes he can make America safe by firming up his nation’s borders. But he is kidding himself. The enemy is already IN America.

Back in 1941, America dragged all its people with Japanese heritage out of their homes and plonked them into internment camps. Some hundred and twenty thousand people in all – sixty percent of whom were registered US citizens.

If the Donald used Executive Power to do likewise, he would be looking at imprisoning THREE MILLION PEOPLE.

And they are only those who have declared their faith.

Imagine you are living in an urban cul-de-sac in San Bernardino.

In addition to your house, there are three others. A family of middle-eastern appearance lives in one, a black family in another and a white family in the last. Spot the terrorist.

It could be ANY OF THEM.

So as we wave goodbye to 2015, it is worth considering that we are Living In Interesting Times…


Is it not time this astronomical LIE was exposed?

A typical “shower” consists of about one every FIFTEEN SECONDS.

If I stood under my shower and received one drip of water every quarter of a minute – I would NOT consider it to be a SHOWER!

True, if you mount a camera on a tripod, then set it on a long time exposure (say, an HOUR) the resulting photo is quite spectacular.

But viewing it LIVE, standing out in the garden with your head craned back like an idiot, watching the occasional TINY streak of light cross over the sky – is definitely NOT.


When I was nine years old, I had an epiphany; I realised that Santa Claus, fairies, goblins and God were man-made MYTHS.

And in the fifty-four years since, I have seen nothing to dispossess me of that realisation.

However, while atheism is perfectly acceptable amongst thinking people today, half a century ago, you were looked upon with suspicion – even outright hostility.

I recall that at age eleven, our class (the “A” stream) was given a questionnaire which included the issue of our religion. I wrote down that I was “too intelligent to believe in such rubbish.”

Now you have to remember back in ’63, schools still had “Morning Assembly” – consisting of twenty minutes of hymns and prayers, followed by ten minutes of “announcements” – and the CANE.

Thus when my teacher called me out and stated that HE believed in “such rubbish” I figured I was in trouble – but in the event, he was refreshingly COOL about the whole matter and my arse remained inviolate (on THAT occasion).

Nevertheless, in those days, few people appearing in the witness-box of a court took the option of Affirming (a perfectly legal procedure, with the same penalties for those who are later proven to have LIED) for fear of alienating the judge and/or jury – particularly if they were the ACCUSED.

And again, in those days, couples checking into a hotel double-room had to have the same surnames – or be the same sex.

While doctors were only supposed to prescribe the newly-arrived Pill to married women over twenty-five, who had at least one kid.

However these days, society has moved FORWARD; the Pill is pretty much available on demand – two adults of any sex and/or name can check into a hotel double-room and the receptionist will only look up if their plastic is not in order – and “I wish to Affirm” is frequently heard in court.

And if some prat claims a “non-believer” has NO belief, the answer that they believe in MANY things – just not some clearly made-up DEITY – tends to shut them up.

So now that atheism has been generally accepted by modern society, I believe the time has come for us to move forward AGAIN.

The term Religious Tolerance has long been understood to mean tolerance of OTHER religions – but I believe it is high time to END tolerance of ALL religions.

Given RECENT EVENTS (with doubtless more to come) religion MUST be relegated to the PAST – atheism being replaced by ANTITHEISM.

Religious apologists claim only the EXTREMISTS create problems, but even the so-called “moderate” religions dictate to people what they may eat, drink and wear. And tell them how to live; interfering with their social behaviour, their family planning – and even convincing them to allow the genital mutilation of their babies.

And I have not even STARTED with the excesses of a certain OTHER group (nor will I – those lunatics KILL people).

But imagine a World WITHOUT religion, where women and gays would finally achieve EQUALITY, the REASON for half the wars and most terrorism would VANISH – and just think of all the time, effort and MONEY that would be saved.

In any case, we have now entered the Third Millennium – thus it is well PAST time that Man GREW UP.

By now, we should have had permanent bases on Mars – and more importantly, have ended disease and poverty. Not to mention have developed free, clean and renewable energy.

And had we sloughed off the SCOURGE of religion a thousand years ago, we WOULD have.

These retarded superstitions have slowed the Ascent Of Man for TOO long. Thus we HAVE to move BEYOND them – before they drag us all back to the Dark Ages.

So the next time someone asks you your religion, stand proud and declare yourself to be an ANTITHEIST.

And if they ask why, direct them to any newspaper…


…Began, as we know it today, around 1920. It emerged at the beginning of “The Jazz Age”. But although the term “Dance Music” was coined early on, the term “Pop” (short for popular) had to wait until the Fifties. In 1920, the New Sound was called – Syncopated Music.

This quickly sub-divided itself into what is now called Pop and Dance. Dance, by definition, is music made for dancing to – but you can also listen to it – while Pop is music made predominantly for listening to – but you can also dance to it. The main difference being – Pop has lyrics.

But in those days, ALL modern music was about BANDS. The vocalists were employed by the bandleader, and had no greater status than the lead trumpeter. However, upon the advent of electronic amplification at the end of the Twenties, that would CHANGE.

The CROONER was born. No longer were singers forced to bellow their lyrics through bull-horns – they could press their lips up to the huge, moving-coil mics and PURR their sounds into it – which would then BOOM through the dance-halls of the day. The POWER!

And with that power came the ability to get THEIR names onto the top of the label – instead of in brackets under the band’s name – often in the form of “with vocal refrain” – while the band’s name slid to the BOTTOM of said label. Bing Crosby, Al Bowlly, Peggy Lee – and of course, Frank Sinatra – became huge stars.

In those early days, labour was cheap. Thus the cost of keeping a 16-piece band – plus singers – and occasionally even a string section – On The Road, was manageable. But after WW2, this soon became impractical. And all but the biggest bands split up into combos. Rock ‘N’ Roll was born.

It was a merging of several styles – Boogie, Jump-Jive, Rock-A-Billy (up-tempo Country) and Rhythm-And-Blues (up-tempo Blues) – even Gospel. Elvis was the catalyst, turning R ‘N’ B WHITE.

But post-war repression gave Rock ‘N’ Roll a hard time. After the war, education had slowly lengthened the time kids were expected to remain in school – living with their PARENTS. Which inevitably caused friction – and REBELLION. Parents failed to understand this, and blamed their kids’ behaviour on the MUSIC the kids liked, not realising the music was an EFFECT of their behaviour – not its CAUSE.

Thus radio stations refused to play it and record companies refused to record it – they were run by Old Men – with the inevitable result that it was driven UNDERGROUND. While the Fifties charts were filled with middle-of-the-road pap, the kids were bopping to R ‘N’ R in juke joints.

This ended in the late Fifties, when managers realised their stars would never make MONEY from R ‘N’ R, and so began grooming them as “all-round-entertainers”. But around the corner – was THE SIXTIES!

In the Sixties, everything changed. Firstly, the people in charge of radio stations and record labels began to realize that the kids of today HAD money – and fashion designers came to the same conclusion. And those budding musicians who as kids had been part of the underground scene in the Fifties realised that R ‘N’ B and R ‘N’ R still had POWER – and could be MODERNISED. Enter the “Beat” scene, with its leaders – The Beatles.

The Beatles were given previously unheard-of room to develop, under the skilled auspices of George Martin – a gifted musician who had formerly been side-lined at Parlophone as a recorder of comedy records. And you hardly need THIS historian to tell you how THAT went.

And whilst even the Sixties had to end, the die had been cast. Now, YOUTH was what Pop and Dance were all about. And this movement continued through Prog Rock, Disco, Punk and eventually, Techno. Which brings us NEARLY to today. But at this point, to understand where we ARE today, it is necessary to detail the history of the medium without which NONE of the above would have HAPPENED. The Record Companies.

And at said point, this writer is forced to limit his description of events predominantly to the BRITISH scene, since it is THAT scene that he has experienced. But ALL record companies, World-wide, share the same paranoia, dealing as they do, with a product you cannot see, touch or in any real sense, consume. It can only be HEARD. Thus they have jealously guarded their “product”.

Sound recording started as a gimmick, long BEFORE the advent of Pop and Dance, merely FALLING INTO the commercial possibilities when the MUSIC emerged. Initially, the companies were run by the formats’ inventors – Edison and Berliner.

But as Pop and Dance began to achieve recognition, many small companies started up, eager to take advantage of the phenomenon. But as is the way of such things, it wasn’t long before the take-overs and mergers began. In Britain, there were two leaders – Columbia (no relation to America’s Columbia) who handled popular artists – and His Master’s Voice, with it’s famous trade-mark of the dog and gramophone, who went with more serious music.

During it’s rise, Columbia had acquired Regal Records and HMV, the Zonophone Co. In 1931, HMV effectively took over Columbia. And Parlophone was brought in as well. Thus the new company with its new Abbey Road studios, record pressing plants, record-player, radio (and later, television) manufacturing units, laboratories (where TV was developed – see elsewhere in these chronicles) and retail outlets (HMV Record Shops) controlled more than half the audio (later, audio-visual) industry of Great Britain. And Decca (similar story) controlled most of what was left.

And this situation continued – with outlets in The States – for the next FORTY YEARS.

The only major development came after WW2, when Philips – the European equivalent of EMI – began a record company in Britain. The success of which was based SOLELY on their having managed to wrest the license to distribute AMERICA’S Columbia records from EMI’s Columbia – giving them an immediate, ready-made catalogue of US-recorded MOR hits to flood Europe with.

And Pye – a small British manufacturer of A/V equipment – had some success when they signed the King of Skiffle, Lonnie Donegan. And Rank – a British film production and releasing organisation – gave it a go, but folded the division after a few years. Others came and went also, but EMI and Decca RULED until the end of the Sixties – then it all fell apart. The big two had price-fixed and strangled the market for so long – they forgot about the customers.

Who wanted DIVERSITY. And in the early Seventies, a whole lot of little companies began to GIVE them that. Let’s examine one of them. Virgin. A middle-class hooray called Richard Branson started the label with small facilities and would have gone the way of others who’d done similar – had it not been for another young man by the name of Mike Oldfield.

Mike Oldfield had made a record called “Tubular Bells”. Sort of Electric Folk, it caught the mood of The New Age – and was immediately popularised by having a piece of itself included in the hit film “The Exorcist”. “Bells” quickly became first an underground – then mainstream – HIT.

And Branson began selling SHED-FULLS of copies from his shop, above a shoe-shop in London’s Oxford Street. He also had a Man In New York who bought PILES of American rock titles he knew would sell in London and air-freighted them to Branson’s shop. This KILLED HMV Oxford Street, where you had to ORDER them one at a time – which meant they cost a fortune and you had to WAIT for delivery. At Virgin, they cost LESS than retail (records were always cheaper Stateside).

Furthermore, Branson would sell ANY records – at ANY price he felt to be fair. And since OODLES of small companies – many with just ONE signing – began following his lead, he had lots to choose from. Anarchy ensued! The price-fixing system where any company selling a record cheaply could NOT get distribution in the majors’ shops was OVER. The prices tumbled. By the beginning of the Eighties, records had never BEEN so cheap. But it wouldn’t last.

What was left of the big companies had a SECRET WEAPON. The last major record format change had happened at the end of the Fifties. The transfer from shellac (78s) to vinyl (45s and 33 1/3rds). It was time for ANOTHER one. Enter the CD. The Thing That Killed Pop.

The thing about pop is it’s SINGLE-BASED. You have an idea for a sound. You get some chums round and form a band. You rehearse. Get small gigs. Press a demo single at a small factory. Get your girlfriends to plug it to DJs. IF a radio station plays it, you MIGHT get a few orders. If you can fill them, your single enters the BOTTOM of the Hot 100.

At this point, radio stations prick up their antennae. They give it air-play. It builds. Eventually a scout from a major hears it and signs the band. They put ’em in the studio. Tracks are recorded – along with a better production of that single (or the original, if the quality is good enough). Tours are organised to sell the album – which people will BUY, having now HEARD it. Then you go back into the studio to record the follow-up. And so on. Rock And Roll!

But although the CD was INTENDED to be an album AND single format – it never happened. Single “mini-discs” WERE issued for a while, but the format died on its arse. It needed an ADAPTOR for some players’ “cup-holders”, so was issued with one. Trouble was, it cost MORE to make the mini-disc and adaptor than it did to simply make a full-size DISC. Thus CD singles merely became SHORT versions of the albums. The single was DEAD. And with it, entry-level Pop.

Of course, the record companies didn’t CARE about the lack of New Talent. They were too busy fleecing the public. Selling them new equipment (most record giants were then owned by, owned, or had SOME tie-in with the companies making the hardware) and encouraging them to RE-PURCHASE music they had ALREADY PAID FOR, in the new format. All it took was a cheap, back-room clean-up of the tapes they, the record company, already OWNED. Now, they could re-sell their entire back-catalogue. All of the classic albums – and ever-more-cheesy compilations.

And “in order to pay for the new equipment” – an argument that began losing credibility after TEN YEARS – the record companies charged SERIOUS money for the discs. Audio-cassettes of “singles” (three tracks off the album) and albums were issued as a stop-gap, but actually cost the record companies more to make than CDs – so they REALLY pushed those discs.

But eventually the public had purchased new hi-fis – and RE-purchased all the nostalgia they needed – and so the record companies were forced to re-think their strategies. Having developed NO New Sound (the CORE of Pop) their first move was to try and galvanise their producers. And those guys, not being creatives, fell back on the hits of the PAST.

Hiring groups of pretty boys and girls who would look good on posters (these guys knew MARKETING) they did a series of lame covers (shades of Woolworths’ “Embassy” records) knowing their demographic (gullible teens) would be too young to be able to remember the originals – and sold them this crap at FULL PRICE. A monstrous RIP-OFF.

But eventually, the young wised up (particularly when their parents played them the ORIGINALS of those lame covers!) and the companies needed ANOTHER trick. And right NOW, amongst the firings of their execs and tumbling balance sheets – they’re STILL looking for it! Which brings us back to the music.

We left things at the end of the Eighties. Pop’s Last Hurrah. New producers had revived Pop and it was on a high that ALMOST resembled that of the Sixties. But like the Sixties, there was a hangover due. The Nineties was The Decade Pop Died. Well, almost.

The thing was, Pop had always shared the stage with Dance (see above, right at the start of this reminiscence) and when Pop had been in the front seat, Dance had always taken a rest in the back. And vice-versa. But over the decades, Pop had mostly hogged that front seat – however, once more, change was around the corner.

You see, Pop has a CYCLE. And it lasts about ten years. It consists of (1) Birth. Someone comes up with a New Idea. Like Elvis with White R ‘N’ B. Then (2) Development. Others jump on the band-waggon. Then (3) Peak. The New Sound rules! Then (4) Decline. The New Sound becomes repetitive, with “variations”. And finally (5) Fallow Period. This is filled with “novelty records” – one-offs that do well but have no band-waggon – plus instrumentals and DANCE.

And in 1990, we fell into a VERY fallow period. However, Dance came to the rescue. Remember – “Dance; music made predominantly for dancing to – but you can also listen to it.” And in the Eighties, in addition to the European Techno-Pop sound of Duran Duran, Frankie Goes To Hollywood, Pet Shop Boys, etc. – there was a thriving Techno Dance scene.

The same MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface) computer tech that helped shape Eighties Pop had also been commandeered for the underground RAVE scene of that period. This developed into “House” – a back-beat STRIPPED of melody. But when, E-ed out of your gourd, you required rest, there was usually a “Chillout” tent where screens with digital cartoons would be accompanied by a sound then called “Ambient”.

This was a spacey techno-trip – with a gentle beat, so’s dancers could “come down” slowly. Aaa-ah. And as the Eighties gave way to the Nineties, this evolved into TRANCE. Trance began, essentially, as Ambient, but slowly developed into a more gentle form of Dance music in its own right. And it had LYRICS. Which by definition (see WAY above) made it POP.

And by the end of the Nineties, it had gone MAINSTREAM. But it differed from conventional Pop in several ways. Pop records mostly lasted three minutes and had an intro, a middle and an end (albeit sometimes faded). But Trance records had a LONG intro, usually TWO middles and a long OUTRO.

This was because they were not designed to stand ALONE. Trance records were designed to be MIXED into a SERIES of tracks, by skilled DJs. As single units, they didn’t WORK. But the industry had an answer for that too. Much to the DISGUST of clubbers and ravers, they HIRED these skilled DJs to do THEM professional 80-minute (the max length of a CD) mixes of the latest anthems that they could SELL to the general PUBLIC.

That way, those who could not attend clubs or raves could, by proxy, be a part of the ONLY innovative musical scene that EXISTED in the Nineties. And they LAPPED it up. Some even WENT to clubs and raves (although the older fans had trouble getting IN!) Thus, Trance was in many ways, The Pop Of The Nineties.

But following the Ten Year Rule detailed above, even Trance would not last forever. In the early “noughts” it obeyed that rule, fading into remixes, chillout versions of the anthems and finally – silence.

So where does this leave Pop today? Well of course, thanks to THIS medium, the record companies have had their day. Many bands now actually IGNORE those companies, preferring to release their music on the Interweb for FREE – whilst making their money from live gigs.

But in one way, this is a tragedy. Because for all their faults – and there were MANY – the one positive thing the record companies DID do – was CHANNEL New Talent. Whereas the Interweb is a free-for-all, unmanaged, undisciplined, uncoordinated MESS. If a band like the Beatles emerged today, no WAY would they reach the kind of numbers the Fab Four did.

And one last thing. And this is something no record company could do ANYTHING about. Melody. There are only twelve notes in an octave. And since 1920, ALL logical progressions of those notes have been DONE. When did you last hear a NEW tune you could whistle?

Since 1980, few. This is thanks to “copy ID” computer programmes developed by the music publishers to save them the expense of suing each other over plagiarism. They have made it virtually impossible for new melodies to be composed.

Music as we know it, was developed nearly a THOUSAND YEARS ago (plain-song, madrigals, etc.) In the West, it slowly established a whole bunch of RULES, regarding chords and tones. But those rules are not fixed. Other civilizations have DIFFERENT rules. To us, their music sounds atonal. But if MUSIC (not just Pop) is to PROGRESS, perhaps we need to re-define what music IS? Pause for thought.

At which point, I think I’ll go and stick some Miles Davis on my gramophone…


Like everyone else, I have seen those documentaries where guys try to approach this legendary place and get warned off by heavily armed militia, then show planes taking off from Las Vegas with blacked-out windows – and get told by officials that there is no such PLACE as Area 51. Plus the base’s borders have been pushed back now, so you cannot even see the place through long lenses.

All of which means “THEY” really want to keep the place SUPER hush-hush, right? Well, you would THINK so. However, just for the hell of it I decided to see what it looked like on Google Earth. But since I had heard Dead-eye Dick Cheney’s place was PIXELISED on the service (Dead-eye was probably sunbathing nude when the satellite went over – and NO-ONE wants to see THAT) I was not expecting much.

How wrong I was.

I input “groomlakenevada”, the ACTUAL name of the area (figuring Google Earth would hardly be likely to respond to “Area 51”) and after floating round the dried-up lake for a few seconds, I spotted an airstrip, with roads and buildings. It LOOKED like the right place. I zoomed down and as I approached the ground, a flag came up.

It said – “Area 51”!

WHAT???! Yes. In fact, I discovered you can just input “area51” and save yourself the chore of searching Groom Lake. And the satellite picture is as sharp and clear as DAY. With the airstrip, roads and buildings – even craters where they tested nukes in the Fifties – all clearly labelled as points of interest.

Of course, conspiracy theorists will say the pics have been doctored – but HOW? I mean, it is all THERE. Everything you would expect to see on a military base in the desert. What the hell did they EXPECT to see? Back-engineered flying saucers parked on the hanger aprons?

I suspect that all of that security on the ground is only there to stop a working military base being overrun by geeks, nerds, cranks, weirdos – and umpteen TV documentary crews making yet ANOTHER bloody programme about the “mysterious” goings-on at Area 51!


Elsewhere in these columns I have remarked upon how in England you can freely make love with a sixteen-year-old, have sex with a prostitute and do many other things that Stateside, would result in your incarceration (hell, UK girls may even overlook Americans’ lack of chest-hair and foreskin).

And do not even get me STARTED on the issue of SMOKING.

But here is another one – American BANKS.

Now we are all familiar with their monumental corruption – they nearly broke the World a few years back – but at a local level, they are even worse.

F’rinstance, let us say you are English and have just returned from a holiday in the US. You managed to avoid getting tased, arrested or shot – survived their LITTLE pints of acidic beer – and have twenty of their bucks left.

So you take it to the bank and change it for your larger Pounds. Then you pay the money into your account. But later that same day, you decide to buy some REAL beer, so you hit the ATM.

And if you withdraw that twenty bucks – it is STILL WORTH TWENTY BUCKS (minus about 20 cents).

However, if you are a YANK, things are a bit different; in addition to the usual one percent exchange differential, they’ll hit you with a FEE of SEVERAL DOLLARS – then the ATM will clip you ANOTHER THREE.

By the time the bastards are finished – you might owe THEM money!


Bag For Life = wife

I’ll add more as they occur to me…


So I am NOT the only Liberal Socialist in the World – it turns out Bernie “Feel The Bern” Sanders is one too.

However, I suspect his chances of becoming POTUS 2016 are about as good as MINE (I was born in England).

I mean, current incumbent Barry Obama is a LONG way to the right of Bernie and yet he has spent the last seven years butting heads with the most intransigent, knuckle-headed, bloody-minded, right-wing Congress in HISTORY – including those supposedly on HIS SIDE. So what makes Bernie think he can fare any better?

Plus there is his age to consider; if elected, he would be 75 when he assumed office. And 83 when he left it, if he stood for – and won – a second term.


It is sad that both “liberal” and “socialist” are dirty words these days (the latter, thanks to Blair). Liberal means free and generous – and socialism is for The People. What the hell is wrong with THAT?

So I wish him all the best; he IS currently well ahead of Old Ma Clinton in the polls – and only Trump seems to be doing anything on the other side. But then, while merely A Week Is A Long Time In Politics (so said Harold Wilson) – a YEAR is a HELL of a long time…


I’ll let you into a secret; a small part of me (a very DARK part) hopes it DOES.

It would probably COST me, but it would almost be WORTH it – for the ENTERTAINMENT value!

And as for America; well, they say a country gets the police and government it deserves – and given the best US president in my lifetime (currently, 63 years) has spent his last seven years being blocked at every turn by the most intransigent Congress (BOTH sides) in history – and hated by at least half its citizens, just for trying to HELP them – they DESERVE TRUMP.

But what are his chances?

At the moment, they are looking spookily GOOD. He may regret signing that pledge not to stand as an independent (Trump is not too smart; he blew his last run at the White House, by handcuffing himself to a dead hooker called Bertha – make that Birther – and not laughing at Seth Meyers’ jokes at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner) as the GOP fear and loathe him.

But then, who else have they got?

A bunch of no-hopers and losers, as Trump himself would doubtless call them – and as usual, he would be RIGHT.

They include yet another damn Bush, a closeted homosexual (YOU guess who) and a guy (Bobby Jindal) who looks like an Indian Alfred E. Neuman.

So if he DOES get nominated, who will he be facing? Old Ma Clinton may still be thought of as a slam-dunk for HER party – but many do not trust her. Plus she did come SECOND to Obama.

While Uncle Joe Biden is too OLD and did not support Obama’s main victory thus far – the Bin Liner Hit.

And Bernie Sanders is even older than Biden – plus he looks like the Doc, from the “Back To The Future” movies.

All of which means that in 18 months, the Oval Office could JUST be occupied by… no, REALLY? Come ON!


So a “disgruntled” local news reporter falls out with two of his former colleagues – a cameraman and a female reporter.

Now if this had happened anywhere else, the guy (who was at best short-tempered and more likely, totally psychotic) might have ventilated the guy’s car-tyres and posted the woman something brown, smelly and unpleasant.

But no, this happened in AMERICA – Land Of The Free, where any idiot can buy a gun – and many do. And so he shot and killed them both, live on air.

Furthermore, to publicize his actions to the max, he recorded the killing on his mobile phone (held the wrong way up – thus demonstrating why he had been a reporter, rather than a cameraman) and uploaded it onto the Social Network.

(It has since been blocked, but you can find it easily enough).

Then, while being chased by the cops, he blew HIMSELF away.

Nice one, NRA. Another winner.

Of course, those arseholes would doubtless claim that if EVERYONE in The States were tooled up, the incident would have ended differently.

Sure; give three hundred and twenty million self-obsessed, paranoid drama-queens guns and tell me how THAT works out…


Road Rage is generally thought to be committed by people with issues – damaged people – you know – arseholes.

And this is probably largely true.

However, there is another phenomenon which may be at least PARTIALLY responsible – work-related stress nervous breakdowns.

WAY down this column is a piece on the subject ( in which this writer describes a scenario where an office worker who has been doing their job for a decade one day spills their coffee – then goes POSTAL.

But supposing that worker were a sales rep, area manager, surveyor, service engineer – or any one of a VAST number of occupations where they spend half their working day on the road?

This reporter used to BE a service engineer and can report that fixing machines (even difficult ones – he enjoyed a challenge) is a breeze, compared with the arduous task of DRIVING from gig to gig.

Thus if he had not walked AWAY before his W-RSNB, the chances are far more likely he would have had it while behind the WHEEL – than while fiddling around with wires and components.

The maniacal exploits of some road rage arseholes would seem to bear this theory out. However, it is impossible to PROVE, since said arseholes – if they end up in court – would rather take their lumps, than go through a psych evaluation.

So how many of them were having a MELTDOWN at the time of their offence will likely never be known.

But it HAS to be some; so the next time YOU are motoring – try not to piss anyone OFF!


Jules O'Dwyer with Chase

I hear over eight hundred people complained to Ofcom about Jules O’Dwyer using a “ringer” (a similar-looking pooch to Matisse) in the “Britain’s Got Talent” Final.

These people need to GET A LIFE!

The contestant was JULES – it was SHE that was being voted for, not her dogs.

She is a BRILLIANT animal trainer (able to quickly train her dogs to perform MULTIPLE tricks, in SEQUENCE – most trainers use many dogs, each of whom can only do ONE) and wholly deserved her win.

Matisse didn’t like tightrope walking, so she used Chase, who had already been on before, for the gag – swapping them over behind the set, for continuity.

This is SHOWBIZ, BABY! Things are not always as they seem.

When a stage magician climbs up a stair into a box – and the box rises and explodes – then said magician appears at the back of the auditorium – it is NOT magic.

In reality he slid down INTO the stair, which was wheeled off to the wings – where he popped out and ran through the myriad corridors that exist outside the auditorium of all theatres (how do you think they change all those bulbs?) to emerge at the back. Ta-daah!

And when a team of comedians delivers half-an-hour of sparkling, flawless “improvised” wit in a panel show – who do you think the dozen “programme associates” listed in the end credits are? GAG-writers, that’s who.

While “…Got Talent” is FUELLED by illusion. Every year, World-wide, the format filters out several hundred middle-rate acts (plus some truly awful ones for laughs – and to make the others look good) from the many thousands who present, then builds BACK-STORIES around them – and POLISHES them.

Thus refined – with added music, lighting, sets, equipment, dancers, backing singers et al – the best of these acts SHINE.

Variety is RESTORED by the very medium that KILLED it! Hooray.

So, the eight hundred pencil-necked prats who whined to Ofcom – did you ENJOY Jules and her dogs’ performance? Yes? Then SHADDAP!


So there it was. Auntie had announced that following the removal of her errant nephew, she would screen the material made for the last three eps of Season 22 as a special – WITHOUT him.

This reporter pointed out that removing Jeremy from the footage would be like trying to excise the bride from a wedding video – and gave his commiserations to the editor upon whom the impossible task would fall.

Well, in the event, Clarkson’s fizzog remained on the footage itself, but with just The Hamster and Captain Slow giving uninspired intros (in an empty studio) to the two pieces it consisted of (the second was best, but neither contained much we had not seen before) followed by a brief goodbye and the end credits – with NO music.

Oh dear – gone with a whimper, not a bang.

I noted that said credits included the little producer – Poison – who more than anyone caused the programme’s sudden fall. Although the blame HAS to be shared by the suits who allowed the handbags to become public in the first place (they managed to keep the Savile affair quiet – and that was IMPORTANT).

There was also a credit that appeared to have been for the person who “handled” visiting celebs – but since there was no “Star In A Reasonably Priced Car” (understandably, given that it would have featured Jeremy prominently) one wonders if someone’s Lap will now never be aired. I wonder how quick it was…

Anyhoo, that it that. Of course, with Auntie being famed for her obsession with flogging successful series to DEATH, the series will return next year – but one suspects it will not last long.

Since she now owns the format, she has hired ’80s Ginger Twat, Chris Evans, to replace her troublesome nephew – and he in turn is to find his own co-hosts (surely not Danny Baker?)

This historian predicts his first show (TBB sometime next Spring) will bring in about ten million viewers – and the next, nine. Not nine million – just NINE.


People say Americans don’t understand IRONY.

And yet America is the country that invented the Cheerleader. But it is also the ONLY country in the World where in most states, it is ILLEGAL to BONK one.

Now if THAT isn’t ironic…


I understand that yesterday, the Foo Fighters’ front-man fell off stage in Sweden and broke a leg.

After having it splinted and bound, he went back out and FINISHED THE GIG.

DAMN, the man has bigger ones than me – if I had broken a TOE, I would still be in hospital!


Two days ago, I heard this nauseating song covered on BGT and was reminded of how far we have come since My Day – ALL DOWN.

This Anthem To Abstinence was written at the height of the AIDS scare and sung by a guy called Germaine who called himself an R&B artist (apparently, he had never heard of Muddy Waters, Buddy Guy or the recently departed BB King).

And here it was again.

Today, Pop Music is all covers – In My Day, we had the ORIGINALS.

Today, clothes are shades of black – In My Day they had COLOUR.

Today, the few movies made for grown-ups are all remakes – In My Day… …you get the point.

I PITY today’s generation. We Children Of The Sixties REJECTED sexual repression. We don’t have to take… BOLLOCKS!

We had our OWN Anthem. It was called If It Feels Good – DO IT!



For five minutes in the Eighties, this phenomenon was “trendy”.

However, in the Twenty-Teens, there are only two excuses for a man to sport it; one: he is in the transitional stage of growing a beard (in which case, he should AVOID public gaze as far as possible – like a man who recently got a nose job and now looks like he just pissed off Mike Tyson – until the process is complete) or two: he is a homeless person, a transient, a tramp – a BUM.

I understand some ladies actually LIKE their men to have stubble, their thinking (?) being it makes them look “rugged” – however, they have obviously never received oral pleasure from one, or they would think somewhat differently (those who have, know what I mean).

So if YOU are one of those idiots who think a few days not shaving will make you look butch – FORGET about travelling down-under. If you are planning THAT little trip – invest in a RAZOR, buddy-boy…


Like a battered wife whose abusive husband has promised yet again to behave himself, the British public returns to the Polls today.

But where they put their little crosses (or ticks – which are normally discounted) will matter little.

The current general election ALMOST marks (just ten days shy) the CENTENARY of what I like to call the British Party.

Most people acknowledge Britain is a Two-Party country – despite several tries, no third party has had significant power since the 17th of May, 1915 (WW2 saw a three-party coalition; but it was ruled by Tory leader, Winston Churchill. Anyone remember the other two leaders? Precisely).

However, I would go further.

Given that both sides always “play the game” and NEVER SERIOUSLY rubbish the other side, no matter WHAT excesses they may inflict on the British public, I believe the time has come to accept the obvious: they are ONE PARTY.

Therefore, whichever “half” the British public elect today, the British Party will STILL rule – probably for the NEXT hundred years…


On the occasion of his eightieth birthday, Big Chief Screaming Eagle is being interviewed by a young reporter from the local newspaper.

They are sitting by a tent on the edge of the reservation, smoking an unspecified substance. Suddenly the old Native American stiffens and stands, looking far into the distance.

“The Thunderbird approaches,” he says.

“You mean the legendary bird that presages storms?” asks the cub.

“Don’t be absurd,” answers the old man, “My mechanic is returning my car from its 20,000 mile service.”

Later that same day, the young reporter finds the chief out on the prairie, lying prone, his head to the ground. “What happened?” he asks.

“Twenty buffalo passed this way,” the old man whispers.

“How do you know?”

“They ran over me.”

Later still, the madam of the Silver Dollar Saloon is instructing her newest recruit, a delicate young girl from Back East.

“Now, your first customer will be Big Chief Screaming Eagle. He’s a regular here, so we give him a discount. The discount rates are – a blow job; twenty, full sex; fifty – and another twenty for foreplay.”

“I do not know what foreplay is.”

“Don’t worry – neither does Big Chief Screaming Eagle.”

In case you were wondering: this author, “Laugh-In” and… I can’t remember.


The latest episode in this saga has had its critics; the old trick of making an actioner fit the PG13 mould – and concentrating on young actors (everyone wants to watch the sexagenarian guys still kicking ass and taking names) – plus its containing less humour than the previous two outings – did not endear it to critics or audience.

Which is not to say it was a turkey. It still passes a couple of hours entertainingly, if you are not too demanding. But while it still scraped a profit (where the first two cleared a fifty percent boost) it suffered a BIG drop in the domestic gross. Why?

Well, the bit that dented it for THIS critic was where – around 56 minutes in – a “drone” is produced, which has four large wheels (clearly driven from the bottom) which are used to trundle it a relatively short distance – then it simply “levitates” without ANY visible means of vertical propulsion.

One can imagine that perhaps the original drawings had the wheels pivoting horizontally, then – the spokes shaped as propellers – up she goes. But somewhere along the line, this notion got LOST.

The director simply hiked up the model, using a fishing rod, figuring it would be sorted in post.

But aside from painting out the supporting wires – it WASN’T.

This is just not GOOD enough. Granted the stunts in these kinds of actioners stretch credibility to the max – but at least they do not employ MAGIC. Save that for Harry Potter. An Expendables fan does NOT expect to be treated like a KID.

Even if the wheels HAD doubled as propellers, it would have been hard to accept – given the machinery required for the transformation would have made the whole too heavy to get airborne.

In any case, given the distance it covered on the ground was not far, launching a conventional drone into the air from the starting point would have been a far simpler option.


There is already talk of an Expendables 4; but if the franchise is not to go down the DUMPER – howlers like this one must NOT be allowed to damage its word-of-mouth.


It is a sad indictment on modern British society that this storm in a teacup was ALLOWED to expand into the PR sh*tstorm it became – eventually toppling the monster that was Top Gear.

And whose fault was it? Not Jeremy’s. He is just a big nob-head who had been doing Top Gear for too long – twenty-seven years. Even cops and soldiers are allowed to retire after twenty-five.

In any case, one could see his point. If you were a highly-paid celebrity with twenty-seven years seniority and you had been out filming all day, then returned to the hotel, miles from anywhere, to find you had no DINNER – and an oik with just SIX years under his belt failed to move Heaven and Earth to obtain you some – YOU would be pissed off too.

LITERALLY tired and emotional.

No, the fault lies with the MONUMENTAL IDIOT who permitted this handbags to grow into a gargantuan issue – instead of SQUASHING it at birth.

Celebrities have always behaved badly. They vibrate at a different frequency from us mortals.

The secret has been to COVER UP their indiscretions. A science which today, appears to have been LOST.

This latest fiasco SHOULD have been handled thusly; Clarkson and junior producer should have been led into the responsible BBC exec’s office, where said exec should have rounded on them with, “Are you chaps nuts? This is a f***ing disaster. Top Gear is one of our biggest money-spinners ever – half our foreign income depends on it. If this thing gets out, we’re ALL f***ed. Now this is what’s going to happen.

“Number one – this never occurred. If either of you are asked about it, deny, deny, deny.

“Number two – in the old days, I’d have given you both ten minutes in the BBC car park to sort it out the old fashioned way. However, in this case, I can see that would be unwise; to paraphrase the words of Sir Michael Caine, You’re a big man Clarkson, but you’re outa shape – Raisin would spifflicate you.”

“Oisin, sir.”

“Whatever – look, what exactly do you WANT out of this?”


“Okay, how about a million quid for your favourite charity?”

“Oh, well…”

“Done – Jeremy, get your cheque book out.”

And that would have been that. Following a quick transfer of the producer (with a guarantee his career would not suffer over the affair) the latest season of Top Gear would have been completed, ending (“on that bombshell”) with the announcement of Clarkson’s retirement from the show, stating longitude of service as the reason.

Then, if Yogi, Captain Slow and the Hamster had been amenable (all three of their contracts were/are due to come up for renewal in a few months) Top Gear could have continued, with a new leader.

Finally, if Jeremy had been amenable, there would have been an attempt to REBOOT him (in a “safer” format) as soon as possible (after all, he made a pretty good fist of a chat-show about fifteen years ago) before Digger could grab him.

And provided Clarkson’s replacement on Top Gear had not been a total disaster (like Stephen Fry or Steve Coogan – who would never do it anyway) then that programme and the new vehicle for Jeremy (did you see what I did there?) could between them have made even more money than just Top Gear was making, before – as Clarkson remarked earlier – the BBC f***ed it up.

But now, none of that can happen. Auntie’s PC dimwits DID f*** it up. And Digger probably WILL now step in and grab him.

Unless of course, Jeremy wants a BREAK – after all, he hardly needs the money. However, him being only 54, I suspect he will be back on our TV screens sooner rather than later. Let us just hope that THIS time – he is “handled” better.

So what IS the TRUTH regarding this affair?

Well, it is a fact all other writers appear to have totally OVERLOOKED; simply that you, my reader – and I, your humble scribe – SHOULD NEVER HAVE KNOWN ABOUT IT.

By all that is holy, it should have been TOTALLY SUPPRESSED.

After all, this was not a serious assault, sexual creepiness, fraud or corruption (and plenty of THAT goes unreported). It was just a barney between two grown men.

And for it to have been first permitted to jeopardise, then ultimately TORPEDO a multi-million-pound TV show, with the loss of hundreds of jobs – and further, create DEEP holes in the finances of a major public corporation – is utterly FARCICAL.


I notice one of the spokesmen said he was the “solo” occupant of the plane. He should have said “sole” – but maybe he was trying to make a joke – which would have worked better if he had just said Harry was flying solo.

He should leave the jokes to me – like, I wonder if his HAT came off THIS time?!


Circumcision is the genital mutilation of helpless babies by evil and/or ignorant people.

The reasons this barbaric act is permitted in our modern World are many. Let us examine them…

First, the Jewish nation. According to legend, a bloke called Abe was chatting to God one day, when the Almighty asked him for a favour. Apparently He had realised the beings He had created had a design flaw. And so asked Abe if he could correct this fault by ordering a Bris to be performed on all babies. And so it was and still is.

Of course, this story does raise a number of questions. Like, if God created Man in His image, what model did He use for the organs of reproduction? Did God HAVE them? And if not, how did He inseminate Mary? Did He use Joseph? (If so, that’s another slap in the face for the man who would go down in history as the World’s most famous cuckold).

And if God is perfect, how come He slipped up with such an important detail?  And if He is all-powerful, how come He couldn’t FIX it? Hell, if Ford made a goof like that, they would organise a product recall.

So that is the religious dimension. And in stating it, I THINK I’ve managed to piss off every major religion in the World – which is no bad thing.

But alas, circumcision is not limited to those who practice it for silly religious reasons. Oh no. Approximately 70% of American men have incomplete sex organs as well. Here, the cause appears to be the nature of their society. America is a matriarchy.

So since men cannot be trusted to WASH their junk when they have a shower, their women insist they have their penis’ protective covering REMOVED. They also claim it is aesthetically pleasing. But then again, they think having their chests cut open and getting plastic bags full of salt water stuffed behind their tits makes them look good as well.

Furthermore, American women care little for their men’s sexual satisfaction. Rather than go on the pill and risk getting FAT (or even FATTER) they demand their men continue to wear CONDOMS after marriage. This is pretty tough on said men, since – as we will see later – half of their stimulation disappears after circumcision. And most of the remaining half disappears when they don a condom.

Which means that while a man’s brain will ADAPT to varying degrees of stimulation (a vibrator delivers a FAR higher level than a hand – but either will do the trick, if you pause in between) if a circumcised man is using a condom, he has to make do with at best TEN PERCENT of the stimulation THIS reporter receives, every time HE makes love.

Now, having pissed off most AMERICANS, there are still a few MORE reasons why circumcision is supported, so let us examine THOSE…

Historically, after Abe, comes sexual repression. In days of yore, it was realised that a circumcised penis is much harder to masturbate with. You have to use a LUBRICANT – and the ejaculate goes all OVER the place. Thus it was believed removing the foreskin would remove boys’ temptation to “abuse” themselves (yeah, like THAT’D work).

Then there are the medical considerations. True, there are a couple of medical conditions where circumcision is advisable – however, these are very RARE. And far MORE problems, particularly in infants, are CAUSED by the practice.

And recently, came stories that a circumcised penis was more resistant to VENEREAL DISEASES. You know – STDs. Except there is NO medical evidence to support this. And again, a little attention to personal hygiene will soon level THAT playing field.

Again speaking personally, this reporter has had “unprotected” sex with over a hundred women and by observing basic hygiene, the worst thing he ever picked up was N.S.U. (The disease, not the car). A course of antibiotics later and he was back in the game.

Of course, this genital mutilation is not only practised on BOYS. In certain primitive countries – particularly ones where women are treated like sh*t – FEMALE “circumcision” is commonplace. This involves removal of the top of the clitoris, thus eliminating most of the women’s pleasure from the sex act. Which in turn means the women don’t enjoy sex – so they don’t make DEMANDS on their men.

But while many international organisations voice their disapproval of THIS practise, they remain far less vocal on the issue of MALE circumcision (Jewish groups have CLOUT).

However, BOTH of these practices are equally vile. But while the female version’s disadvantages are obvious, the male version’s are less so – so let us finally examine THOSE…

As with the female’s, the male’s sex organ is an INTERNAL one. The vital organ is the KNOB (women who masturbate a man’s SHAFT get NOWHERE). And this knob – the “glans penis” to give it its proper name – is covered by a thin, sensitive skin, in which the genital corpuscles are buried.

These are the nerves that give us sexual stimulation. They are present in both women’s clitorises and men’s glans penises. Without them, sex would be pointless and the human race would die out.

And removal of the foreskin causes the skin of the glans penis to become hard and coarse – DRASTICALLY reducing the stimulation the genital corpuscles receive. (Again, the brain compensates for this to SOME degree – but still).

Whereas, with an INTACT penis, the foreskin PROTECTS this skin, with its corpuscles – and only during intercourse does it roll back, allowing the sensitive knob to caress the inside of the woman’s vagina, creating the sensations for both that makes all the dating, fighting, heartaches – and expense – of relationships ultimately worthwhile.

Then when passion is spent, a clever little membrane on the underneath of the penis eases the foreskin back over the knob, once again consigning it to its hiding place.

So remember – if you MUST lean on the crutch of religion – your God knew what he was DOING when he designed the penis. And if you accept that it evolved, NATURAL SELECTION did a good job. So either way – DON’T MESS with it!

FOOTNOTE: GALATIANS 6, verse 15 – “For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but a new creation.” So THERE!
SECOND FOOTNOTE: Lest any circumcised man be in any doubt he is disabled, consider the following; a sighted man (intact) can know what it is like to be blind – but a blind (circumcised) man…

While TV companies have long used this phrase just to trumpet their latest blockbuster show – THIS time, it is no exaggeration.

In Asia, the RTL/CBS network are currently using it to describe the “Watchathon” (their word – they mean marathon) of season three of “House Of Cards” next Saturday (the 28th of February, 2015).

Because what this represents, is no less than a SEA CHANGE in series broadcasting…

For over a century, the film business has always KINDA had series, in the form of “B” movies like the Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce “Sherlock Holmes” and George Sanders “Saint” sagas – and in Britain, various productions from Merton Park Studios.

These were not WEEKLY outings – but SEVERAL tended to be made every year.

Plus of course, you had serials – although the episodes were only around seven minutes long.

No, it took the advent of TELEVISION to introduce the concept of the weekly series. Taking their lead from network radio dramas, the fact that TV had PICTURES – gave the TV companies far more SCOPE (The Lone Ranger does not really work on radio).

And now, sixty-five years later, the One Hour (actually, forty to fifty minutes) Filmed (more likely, recorded digitally) Drama still forms the CORE of television entertainment (with lots of cheap, talent-free “reality” dross effectively financing it).

But for most of that time, viewers have been forced to WAIT a week for the next installment – particularly irksome, if the episodes form a continuous story, with a “cliff-hanger” at the end of each.

However, around ten years ago, things began to change. A NEW player entered the entertainment arena – the HOME COMPUTER.

For decades, the TV industry had banged on about how in the future, viewers would get TV On Demand – but no practical way was ever found to deliver on that promise.

Then along came Netflix…

Beginning in 1997, the company supplied programming by posting DVDs to subscribers – however, within a decade, they were moving over to the now-more-familiar ONLINE STREAMING (back in 2000, Blockbuster could have bought Netflix for fifty million bucks, but declined – whatever happened to them?)

A few years on and Netflix began financing ORIGINAL programming – the first biggie was a new, American version of the British Nineties hit mini-series; the afore-mentioned – “House Of Cards”.

However, where network TV viewers had to wait a year – and then watch the show weekly – Netflix viewers were able not only to watch it a year earlier – but ALL AT ONCE.

The thing is; several years earlier, the “serial” format of shows like “24” had led to a new phenomenon – BINGE WATCHING.

And whilst viewers did not necessarily want to set a WEEKEND aside to watch ALL 24 eps of the actioner – they were more than happy to record the entire series – avoid talking about it with those who were watching it weekly – then, when they had the whole thing on their hard drive (or a series of recordable DVDs) – watch it at their OWN convenience.

TV On Demand had finally ARRIVED.

But this was still a viewer-created thing. Only Netflix, Hula and the like would STREAM an entire series into your “Smart” TV. If only NETWORK TV could do likewise – but then, why NOT?

They could broadcast the eps late night – or over the weekend – so that people with hard drives could record whole series and then watch them at whatever pace they desired.

Which is exactly what is HAPPENING the coming Saturday, but this time – EVERYWHERE.

You see, the problem with Netflix and their brethren is – they have their limitations.

Contractual obligations only allow their programmes to be streamed to Europe and N America. Too bad, if you happen to live in the Orient, like this writer.

But with RTL/CBS having been available on the local satellite/cable platform for about a year now, the World is opening UP.

Thanks to the mere THREAT of Smart TVs STREAMING programmes (despite Thailand MAKING most of the World’s hard drives, few Thais actually OWN one) network TV companies are now FIGHTING BACK against the Online TV Industry by JOINING them in “streaming” series to THEIR viewers, UP FRONT of the weekly showings.

Over the last decade, network TV has SUFFERED at the hands of this newcomer.

Initially, the audio-visual STANDARDS (THOSE again) of the film, TV and computer industries were utterly incompatible – with each industry showing total contempt for the others.

But change is afoot. While the three industries still HATE each other, they also recognise their DEPENDENCE on each other. And so, with digitally projected movies, the next generation of HD TVs and even YouTube adopting the “4K” standard, while currently using 1080/2K (which are virtually the same) the three have called a KINDA TRUCE.

All of which is good for US, the consumers – particularly those of us who reside outside of the “developed” World.

Just a few years ago, foreign network TV’s viewers had to wait months – sometimes YEARS – for the best US/UK series. But now, thanks to the competition from the online industry, many are shown “within 12/24 hours of US/UK transmission” – and NOW, it appears we may even be allowed to watch series On Demand AS WELL.



Earlier in these columns, this writer has banged on a lot about the issues surrounding e-cigs and vaping.

Chiefly the benefits to vapers; it’s LITERALLY a thousand times safer than sticking burning leaves in your gob and costs a TINY fraction of the amount – versus the problem for governments; economies which rely on extortionate (up to 1,000%) tax being levied on tobacco are now being SABOTAGED by CHINA, who INVENTED, DEVELOPED and mostly MANUFACTURE the e-cig devices.

Well, the stats are now in – and some of the results are surprising.

As expected, a number of countries have BANNED them (although curiously, mainly in Scandinavia and central and south America).

And obtusely, most of their governments are using DRUG LAWS to ban only those containing NICOTINE, by treating e-cigs as Smoking Cessation Devices – despite the fact that NO-ONE has ever claimed them to be such.

Unlike with nicotine gum and patches, no-one is pretending they are for those who wish to GIVE UP NICOTINE – rather, merely bring its method of delivery into THIS millennium.

E-cigs are NADS (“Have you seen my NADS?”) It stands for Nicotine Alternative Delivery System.

But by deviously classifying e-cigs and juice as MEDICAL devices and MEDICINES, their SALE and USE can effectively be BLOCKED. This is reminiscent of how America banned alcohol, during Prohibition – by shifting the ISSUE (in that case, to taxation).

However, against ALL expectations, many countries’ governments have (at least, for the MOMENT) taken a PERMISSIVE line on vaping (the only main restriction being to limit it to over-18s) INCLUDING those with the most SWINGEING tobacco taxes.

This historian has a theory on the thinking behind this – could it be they realise that draconian laws to prevent what is obviously in the interests of health and safety will make them look ridiculous (even more so than usual) given how they have demonised cigarettes for decades – and believe that uptake will be SLOW anyway, allowing them to shift the tax burden elsewhere at a speed no-one’ll notice?

And might they have done some maths on how much they can SAVE on healthcare, decorating and other costs – and figure that will help LESSEN the financial pressure on their economies?

Or maybe the dumb bastards are just so far out of touch with what is going on out there in the Real World that they simply haven’t given the matter serious thought AT ALL?

If so, they will soon realise the matter is WORTH serious thought.

These days, many poor people in countries with high tobacco taxes have to consider whether to smoke OR EAT – so it won’t take long for THEM to switch.

Indeed, early indications are that Britain (which contains some VERY poor people, facing a 1,000% tobacco tax) has gone for vaping in a BIG WAY. 700,000 vapers in 2012 – TRIPLING to 2,100,000 by 2013.

If that trend continued – at the time of this typing, ALL of Britain’s smokers should have converted! (I wouldn’t know – I escaped to the Orient).

So what of Hong Kong?

Well, its government appears to have established the Gold Standard for monumental STUPIDITY on this issue. First, like other banners, they classified e-cigarettes and juices as MEDICINAL – theoretically lumping them in with drugs like CRACK COCAINE.

However, they claim they will NOT JAIL TOURISTS who bring them into Honkers for their own use.

Apparently, they are not THAT stupid.

Nevertheless, they DO have the MOST draconian anti-vaping laws in the World (up to two years in the slammer, just for possession) – the question is WHY?

The taxation issue MIGHT be the cause – in HK, cigarettes cost about three times what they cost in China and one can only bring nineteen (yes – NINETEEN!) of them in duty free, but given the VAST WEALTH of the former colony, that seems somewhat putrid.

China mostly permits full use of e-cigs (which is hardly surprising, given they MAKE nearly all of them) although as with everything else Chinese, there are regional variations.

And following its re-acquisition of HK, you would have expected the Honks to fall into line with the reinstated Mother Country. But no.

Of course, like in every other developed country in the World, HK’s anti-vaping laws are unenforcable. No country which possesses an interweb and small packet post can stop or even significantly slow the flow of vaping devices and juice.

But until the idiot Hong Kong government gets its collective head out of its arse, those nicotine addicts unfortunate enough to LIVE there had best take the same meticulous care HIDING their vaping devices and juice – as those crack cocaine users take, hiding their STASH.


Now that TV production companies are streaming programmes DIRECT to “smart” TVs, networks are fighting back, by screening syndicated programmes “within 12/24 hours of UK/US transmission” – which means that out here in the Orient, we are now getting “Top Gear” COMPLETE and QUICKLY.

And that resulted in my just having watched The Hamster go arse over tip in Russia – from the onboard cameras on his nine grand, seventeen ounce pushbike – a couple of hours ago, instead of some time next year. I have not laughed that much in a LONG time.

If you did not see it, try YouTube – someone MUST have posted it.

Furthermore, I’ll bet a number of people now have his moans of pain, as he removed himself and his busted bike from the mean streets of St Pete’s, as their new RINGTONE (after the team’s recent problems in Argentina, I’m guessing Auntie figured her errant nephews would have a harder time pissing off the Ruskies) although taken out of context, those moans COULD sound like he was being SHAGGED.

Either way, the simple truth is that Hammond failed to cross the tracks with due care – and paid a heavy price.

Of course, it might not have been entirely his fault. While most mainland European cities retain their trollies and trams, Britain got rid of all hers DECADES ago (except for Blackpool’s – but they are an integral part of the famous illuminations).

Thus he had probably never encountered train tracks on the road (in Amsterdam, straight across the PAVEMENTS) before.

However, this writer has. Even before he drove around most of Europe, he recalls how his hometown of Ipswich has (or at least, HAD) a number of goods-train tracks in its docklands area.

Approaching them on two wheels, the secret is to veer away at the last split-second – then swing back ACROSS them, as close to ninety degrees as possible (remembering the rear wheel will cut closer).

By so doing, you can avoid the pains The Hamster suffered – but deny others a HUGE LAUGH!


The following is cut from Wikipedia…

“Midnight, 29 April 1945, Hitler married Eva Braun in a small civil ceremony in the Führerbunker. After a modest wedding breakfast with his new wife, he dictated his will.

“Then Braun bit into a cyanide capsule and Hitler shot himself.

“Their bodies were carried up the stairs and through the bunker’s emergency exit to the garden behind the Reich Chancellery.

“They were placed in a bomb crater and doused with petrol. The corpses were then set on fire.”

Worst honeymoon ever.


While I was away, I see the British government took yet another of their giant steps BACKWARDS (they have been doing little else, since 1973) by coming down (so to speak) on PORN – including trying to ban “face-sitting”.

I do not know who came up with this winner (they certainly need to get out more) but if I did – and I knew where they lived – and had the money – I would hire a forty-piece NAKED male choir and get them to assemble outside the person’s house and sing the following…

(If you cannot get any sense out of the above link, go to YouTube and search “Monty Python Sit On My Face live”).


Oh, this is not about white-lit tunnels and suchlike (which is just an optical effect the brain creates when it is in crisis) – this is about something REAL that affects us ALL, every day.

The thing is, as the below piece documents – death is always just a heartbeat away. Most of us will die in bed, some time during our seventies or eighties, however…

As stated below, a couple of months ago, my appendix blew up (obviously, if I had KNOWN this was the case, I would have sought IMMEDIATE medical help). After several days of agony (during which I hoped the pain would get bored and f*** off) my wife finally overrode my protests and called an ambulance.

I am now nearly recovered. But today, out of curiosity, I asked my medic how CLOSE I had been to DEATH when I first presented. He replied that septicemia would have taken me out in five more days.

So my wife saved me. However, back in ’57, it was my MUM who did the honours. She realised that her five-year-old was hallucinating – and that the “cold” the visiting doc had diagnosed a couple of days earlier had turned into something far worse.

She was right – it had become pneumonic.

In fact, had she not run off to the nearest payphone and LEANED on the doc to come out again IMMEDIATELY – it was a SUNDAY – my collapsing lungs would have polished me OFF by MONDAY.

And these are just TWO of the MANY bullets I have dodged In This Place.

As a professional driver for many years, covering nearly a million miles in every kind of vehicle, road and weather conditions – not to mention terrain and COUNTRY – I dodged a NUMBER then.

There was the time I was sitting at a red (urban) traffic light doing some paperwork. Since I constantly flick my eyes to the rear-view mirror, I was aware there was no traffic behind me – so when the light turned green, I remained where I was for the few seconds it took to finish said paperwork.

Then, with the light still green, I began to move forward, when – WHOOSH! A twenty-ton truck flew STRAIGHT across the junction in front of me.

He had to have crossed said junction at least TEN SECONDS after the light had turned red in his direction.

Since I was going the same way as him, we ended up having a CONVERSATION. However, he was contrite and explained that the road was unfamiliar to him and as he had rounded the bend on the approach to that junction, the SUN had hit him straight in the eyes and he had not SEEN the light. By the time he did, it was WAY too late to stop a twenty-tonner, so he had gritted his teeth and HOPED.

Myself being familiar with that approach, I knew he was telling the truth. So we shook hands and that was that.

However, had I NOT been doing that paperwork, I would have ended up as a BONNET ORNAMENT on his truck.

And this is one of a NUMBER of near-misses (an oxymoron) I could detail.

But getting away from traffic incidents – there are many other bullets I have dodged.

In just the last ten years: a fatal train crash where, had I chosen to travel first class (in the FRONT carriage) instead of second (back in coach 13) – you might well not be reading this now. Ditto had I been sitting in the same Hat Yai McDonalds I had sat in many times before – when it got BLOWN UP by terrorists. And then there is the resort I slept in that got WIPED OUT by the Boxing Day Tsunami (Indian Ocean: ten years and one day ago, as I type) just two weeks later.

But the REALLY creepy bit is those incidents I am UNAWARE of. Huh?

Okay, picture this: it is 1968 and I am walking down Oxford Street admiring the shop displays – and a girl with LONG legs and a SHORT miniskirt – when I bump into some bloke. “Hey, look where you’re going, you clot!” “Sorry, there was this chick…”

In short, this boor DELAYS me by five seconds – thus, by the time I reach the next intersection, the “don’t cross” sign is lit. And as I stand there, another errant motorist WHIZZES over the spot I would have OCCUPIED, but for that delay.

However I do not notice – since I am currently admiring ANOTHER Sixties babe.

Screw Kismet – the World is filled with ENDLESS possibilities. Right NOW, how many hospitals’ casualty departments – and MORGUES – are FILLED with people who would be having LUNCH, had they not stopped to talk to the postman – or have another coffee – before leaving their house?

ALL of our lives hang by a thread. And whether that thread SNAPS or not is often decided by the most INNOCUOUS thing.

So mind how you go.


Did you miss me?

The reason your humble scribe has posted nowt new for nearly TWO MONTHS is that he has been away. Doing what? Two months.

But seriously folks, the reality is no joke…

It all started about a year ago. Occasionally, when I turned over in bed, I noticed a TWINGE in the area of my appendix.

Now, associating – with some JUSTIFICATION, but that is another story – hospitals with major PAIN, I gave it a while. And said twinges STOPPED after a few months.

But then, about three months later, just as I was going to the fridge to get a nice cool glass of water – OOOOF! I doubled up in pain, which came from my appendical (?) area, then spread across my entire abdominal region.

After three days of SEVERE pain, my wife finally overrode my protests and sent for an ambulance (my surgeon says another five days and septicemia would have taken me OUT).

Long story short, it turned out my appendix had “ruptured” – (more like EXPLODED; see picture, below) – taking out half my internal organs (the kidneys, in particular) with it.

my appendix

There then followed…

An operation that led to my abdomen resembling John Hurt’s, after HR Giger’s “Alien” had emerged from it.

Followed by hour after hour after HOUR of excruciating PAIN.

Accompanied by a week on Morphine (NASTY stuff – you do not really sleep – just slip into alternate realities. Junkies would LOVE it – but I found it tedious, confusing and occasionally SCARY) and twelve hours of WITHDRAWAL from same.

With SERIOUS post-op depression. I went to deeply DARK places and now understand what poor old Stephen Fry went through, before he signed up for The Programme. If I had had the means… well, you would not be reading this now.

And all told, enough antibiotics to bring Hitler back to life – but they give you high blood pressure and the TROTS (don’t even ask).

Then after WEEKS of daily outpatient visits (in an ambulance – I was in no condition to DRIVE) – where they removed puss-filled swabs from my innards and inserted fresh ones – a SECOND operation to close me up. But at least this one had a shorter recovery time.

Plus – having washed six-and-a-half weeks of CRAP off of Mitzi (my classic Mitsubishi Galant Ultima) – I am now DRIVING again.

However, at the time of typing (46 days after my initial collapse – but it feels like YEARS) my tummy is still held together by four large rubber bands (sort of) – and it will be at least another month before THEY come out (again, sort of; in fact the inner parts will remain inside me after they seal the eight little holes – finally dissolving after about another eighteen months).

It is difficult to find a BRIGHT SIDE of this experience – nevertheless, here goes: (1) I had a caring, loving wife who got me THROUGH the thing (2) now retired to Thailand, I was able to pay for treatment in a local COMMERCIAL hospital, which has set me back over five grand Sterling – eight, American – but I have received care that was FAR superior to that which I would have had to endure in a UK NHS (government) hospital – and which has cost a FRACTION of the sum a commercial hospital in the West would have charged. And (3) all of this aggro has happened during the Thai WINTER, with its low humidity and moderate temperatures (a blessing for me and anyone close by, since I have not been able to have a proper shower in WEEKS – and will not for several MORE to come).

Oh, and having a PVR, I have not had to miss a single program(me) in one of the best Fall (Autumn) TV Schedules EVER. As I type, a few hours ago in America, Carrie has HOPEFULLY finally evened up the score for the 0-11 drubbing her side has suffered in Season Four of “Homeland” – I will find out TONIGHT.

So there it is. After the darkest period of my LIFE, I am BACK (well, almost).

And what lesson can be learned from all the above? (I RARELY write about PERSONAL stuff in these pieces – I am a COLUMNIST, not a blogger). Well, the message is CLEAR. If I had gone to the Palace Of Pain when I first got those twinges, a simple appendectomy would have cost me around a FIFTH of the time, PAIN and money.

So, esteemed reader; do as I SAY – not as I have done. If YOUR body starts giving you warnings of problems ahead – for f**k’s sake HEED them and go and get yourself CHECKED OUT!


This term has been bandied about for DECADES – usually concerning the Arab-Israeli conflicts. But is it not a gigantic OXYMORON? (For those who ain’t good at English like what I am – that means a contradiction in terms).

I mean, the definition of the word “process” is a course of action that changes one condition into another. In this case, obviously – war into peace.

But despite those decades of jaw-jaw, NOTHING has changed AT ALL.

The centuries – nay MILLENNIA – of wars between these middle-eastern tribes carry on and will doubtless continue forever.

So why not be HONEST and call it The Peace INITIATIVE – then we KNOW it’ll be an utter waste of time…


Sounds like the name of a Seventies Pop combo, doesn’t it? Oh, if only it were…

Britain used to be known as “Rip-off Britain” – but these days, it has a new monicker; BROKEN Britain.

This is because nothing WORKS there anymore. The Police, the Post Office, the Passport Office (HMPO) – and that is just the “P”s.

As one who ESCAPED the cold, wet, miserable place for the sunny climes of Thailand more than a decade ago, I only learned how BAD things have now become – when I applied for a renewed passport.

Even though these days I am half-way around the planet, Britain still finds ways to SCREW with me. And over the past four months, it has driven me to DISTRACTION.

You see, ten years ago if you needed a renewed passport, you simply went down to the local Brutish Embassy, filled in a single form and presented it – along with two pictures, your old passport and some money – and two weeks later, picked up the new one. The End.

But no longer. While the Brutish Embassies have long been pretty useless, the one thing they COULD handle was processing passports.

And so some empty suit in Whitehall decided to CHANGE all that.

Passports are now processed by HMPO (which stands for Her Majesty’s Passport Office – although I am sure if she knew what a monumental BOLLOCKS they have made of everything, Liz Windsor would DISOWN the whole rotten outfit).

Under the titular (or just TIT) Paul Pugh, in a mere three months, the backlog of passport applications had DOUBLED. The last I heard, the figure backed up stood at HALF A MILLION – with over fifty thousand family holidays RUINED.

On top of this, the beleaguered STAFF at HMPO are now reportedly LITERALLY SUICIDAL. Working twenty-seven hours a day, nine days a week, they gaze with dismay upon the ever-growing PILE of work lining the walls.

Paul Pugh volunteered to resign – but is still there. Then incredibly, a bunch of tosspots with a SICK sense of humour called “Investors In People” nominated him as “Leader Of The Year” – I kid you not.

Pugh (who MUST have been called “Stinker” at school) announced he would not attend (maybe the death-threats put him off).

Of course, there IS a precedent for this kind of lunacy; after President Woody Wilson signed off on sending a million troops infected with American Plague to all four corners of the World – and in doing so, signed the death-warrants of around FIFTY-FIVE MILLION PEOPLE (thus accounting for FAR more victims than Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Torquemada, Matthew Hopkins, Maggie Thatcher and Attila The Hun PUT TOGETHER) – they awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize.

Anyway, so far this towering arsehole Pugh has not actually KILLED anyone (that I know of – but remember his suicidal staff; sooner or later, one of them will SNAP) but the abject MISERY he has caused is IMMEASURABLE.

Although in my case, it eventually WILL be – at least, in CASH terms – since, aside from giving me four months of MAJOR STRESS, he’ll end up COSTING ME THOUSANDS OF POUNDS (at least TEN, depending on how long I live).

This is because of the TIME of the year I have to make a large cash-transfer, in order to satisfy the annual visa-extension requirements (four hundred thousand Baht in a Thai bank, for a minimum of sixty days) which has now – thanks to HMPO taking FOUR MONTHS to renew my passport (which only had NINE MONTHS left on it) – been resultantly moved BACK from late June (when the Baht-Pound rate is historically at its BEST) to late MARCH (ditto – WORST).

I had foolishly assumed that applying for my renewed passport a full THREE MONTHS before my visa-extension fell due would be long ENOUGH – but NO.

So how, you may wonder, did the HMPO manage to take SO LONG, to do something SO SIMPLE?

Well, buckle up…

It all began when I hit their webshite ( and downloaded all the relevent forms. The first thing I discovered was I needed the answers to four questions their forms failed to cover.

Not having a grand to spare to ring their helpline from a mobile in a foreign country, I sent them an e-mail – SEVERAL times. Eventually I received a reply which answered NONE of my questions, just giving me the URLs to the forms I already HAD – which had obviously GENERATED those questions in the first place.

The dickheads had equally obviously not even READ my e-mail.

So I sent them a NEW one, this time attaching the questions to the SUBJECT. Eventually, they answered TWO of the four questions. More e-mails and I FINALLY got the answers to the remainder. All of this had taken TWO WEEKS.

Then, since you have to pay by INTERNATIONAL BANK CARD (I no longer HAVE one, thanks to Broken RBS – but that is ANOTHER sad story) I got my son (who LIVES in England, poor sod) to pay the fee.

I sent him the money – these days, well over A HUNDRED QUID – in cash, by International Registered post. And since the UK Post Office was also Broken, it took more than ANOTHER week to receive his completed payment form.

But now I was finally set. I still had nearly TEN WEEKS to secure the ESSENTIAL renewed passport.

So, as required, I booked my appointment by e-mail for three days hence, at the “solutions agency” that now “handles” UK passports in Bangkok, who gave me the first appointment they had available – in three WEEKS.

Thus I turned up there with all the paperwork – now more than SIX weeks into the thirteen I had originally allowed for the task.

The agency turned out to be a bird in a box who just checks that you match your picture, fills in a form detailing your paperwork – then despatches the lot to Britain.

A week later, they debited my son’s bank card – the only thing they have EVER DONE QUICKLY.

ANOTHER six weeks on – with just a few DAYS to spare – I FINALLY received an e-mail which I ASSUMED would be the one telling me to pick up the passport from Bangkok. You can therefore imagine the language I used when I read that they had REJECTED MY PICTURES (meaning they had only just BEGUN to PROCESS the application) on the grounds that my glasses had caused “glare” (THEIR word).

Their e-mail stated “there is glare present from your glasses in your eyes” – and demanded NEW ones, before they would even PROCEED with my application.

At this point, a few words about passport pictures. Now traditionally, if you “normally” wear specs, you are supposed to wear them on your passport pictures, provided they are not tinted – or have those silly little frames that were “fashionable” some years back – or have light reflecting off the lenses – or anything else that hides your eyes.

Just for the record, here IS the picture I had sent them…

Now, if this is GENUINELY not good enough for facial recognition software – then said technology is obviously not as clever as they would have us BELIEVE – for as can clearly be seen, the picture was PERFECT.

LARGE frames, with NO tints, reflected light, shadows or ANY damn thing. My baby-blues POPPED right through them. But despite my e-mailed protestations, the HMPO still INSISTED the pictures had “glare” – which brings me to their latest form specifying passport picture requirements.

It clearly states the ORIGINAL rules, concerning glasses – detailing everything that might obscure the eyes.

BUT… it then shows some sample pictures, with dos and don’ts. And they include an old lady with no specs, but SMILING (“WRONG”) – then WEARING glasses, but with huge slabs of LIGHT reflecting off both lenses (“WRONG”) – and then with a vacant expression (like mine, in the above picture) and again, NO glasses (“RIGHT”). All of the other pictures feature specs-less faces.

But NOWHERE does it actually SAY “NO GLASSES” – the instructions merely state what they have ALWAYS stated – that glasses should not OBSCURE THE EYES.

Naturally, if they had SAID no glasses, I would have left them OFF.

One can always remove them if asked, when one presents oneself – as one would with a hat – or shades – or a GAS-MASK.

The HMPO blamed this massive cock-up on the standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (a UN agency that sets the standards for all things aviational). But the latest version of THEIR guidelines I can find – states the following…

Even if applicants normally wear glasses, they do NOT need to wear them for a passport photograph. If they do:
(1) the photograph must show the eyes clearly
(2) there must be NO flash reflection off the glasses
(3) tinted lenses are NOT permitted
(4) the frames must NOT cover any part of the eyes
(5) heavy framed glasses are NOT permitted

…which is pretty-much what the HMPO’s form says. The word “glare” appears nowhere – nor does any instruction to REMOVE glasses.

So I sent them yet ANOTHER e-mail. This particular office was the THIRD my passport application appeared to have been through – in three different countries; England (Liverpool) Wales (Newport) and Northern Ireland (Belfast).

I agreed to send them NEW pictures. And added that THIS time, despite their forms not requiring it, ones WITHOUT specs – since IMPROVING on the previous pictures would be IMPOSSIBLE.

I never received a reply to it.

I tried leaving a “comment” on their passport pictures form, but their link did not WORK. So I tried an alternate link – but that did not work EITHER. I was not surprised; just another two entries in their LONG catalogue of FAILS (plus I suspected they had DISABLED the features – to SPARE themselves from a never-ending barrage of ABUSE).

And so, having sent off this second set of pictures – I waited.

The last possible date to apply for my visa-extension arrived. And I had no option but to use my OLD passport – which gave me TWO problems. As stated above, with only nine months left on it, my future visa-extending dates would SHIFT to ones that will likely result in my losing THOUSANDS in annual money-transfers.

But the second was potentially even WORSE – I COULD have ended up in JAIL (and Thai jails are NOT like the ones in NORWAY).

You see, once you APPLY for a new passport, your OLD one becomes VOID. HMPO says you can continue to use it for “ID purposes” – but not for travelling. But what about visa-extension applications? If the Thai bureaucraps REJECTED mine, I could not even use the passport to temporarily LEAVE the country.

Remember that bloke who ended up LIVING in a transit lounge for years?

In the event, the Thai bureacraps gave me a BREAK. They initially ACCEPTED my old, semi-void passport – but said they would only gave me the NINE months left on it. Meaning I would be “legal” for the MOMENT (even though when I croaked, my widow would likely be TEN GRAND – Sterling, not Baht – worse off).

And on top of everything else, I had to delay paying my quarterly RENT for TWO MONTHS, having decided to RETAIN my 400k Baht minimum bank-balance – just in case. My landlady ALSO gave me a break (Thais have HEARTS) and waited.

But this turned out to have been a SHREWD MOVE on my part, since when Paul Pugh and his Passport Pukes DID finally cough up the new passport (the form asking me to go and pick it up included a demand not to abuse their staff – clearly demonstrating this had HAPPENED) I had to return to the Thai bureaucraps to transfer the old passport’s stamps to it.

And shortly afterwards, they asked me to provide a new bank letter, showing my balance was STILL over 400k. This essentially meant I was making a “semi-new” application (the UK passport ID computer presumably having reported the old passport was now VOID). It had occurred to me earlier that this might happen – and SHOULD get me that all-important YEAR’S extension.

Indeed, the Thai consulate said it would be so – but then some prat in Bangkok goofed up and I eventually STILL only got those goddamned nine months. After several days of will-they/won’t-they, this was yet ANOTHER blow.

But then the FINAL insult came when I discovered that in addition to everything else, Pugh and his cronies had RIPPED ME OFF!!

After four months of giving me enough grief to make an archbishop kick in a stained-glass window, the new passport only had THIRTY-TWO pages, when I had specified – AND BEEN CHARGED FOR – FORTY-EIGHT pages.

As it happens, unless the Thai bureaucraps’ systems change radically, the thirty-two pages should be more than adequate for the next ten years. But given the already extortionate price of the document (a hundred quid plus, remember) I’d figured I might as well spend the extra THIRTEEN QUID for the “jumbo” version – again, just in case.

Which is what the bastards now OWE me. But after ALL they have put me through, I am NOT about to endure yet MORE of their CRAP.

No, they can KEEP my thirteen quid, spindle it up – and RAM it where the sun don’t shine.

So what have we learned from this farrago of f**kup? Well, YOU might want to do FOUR things…

(1) if you live in Britain – get OUT as soon as possible
(2) if you need a passport of ANY kind – give the HMPO at least SIX MONTHS
(3) if you wear glasses and have a passport picture, or ANY picture needed for ID purposes, taken – REMOVE your glasses
(4) if you encounter Paul Pugh – kick him up the arse as HARD as you can and tell him, “That’s with the compliments of Damien.”


Yesterday afternoon, as I lay on a sunlounger watching a dragonfly dipping lazily over an azure pool, a gentle breeze stirred the overhead palm-trees and it occurred to me that right about that moment, half-way around the World, having struggled through the October rain, the excrescent Paul Pugh and his desperate minions would just about now be filing into their offices to begin another day’s slog.

The thought gave me SOLACE…


The following was issued as “Guidance for photographers” on the NINTH OF APRIL 2014 – which was BEFORE I began my passport application – and was NOT added to the guidelines for APPLICANTS.

And as of January 2016, it STILL has not been.

Here it is, verbatim…

“1.4 Glasses

“Customers who wear glasses should remove them to ensure that an accurate biometric can be obtained. Glasses can often show reflection or glare from flash, and the frames can obscure facial features. While this may mean that their passport photo does not show them as they usually appear, their photo will still be a good likeness.

“Customers with a visual impairment should also follow this guidance. Dark, tinted or mirrored glasses must be removed – otherwise a biometric cannot be captured.”

In other words – NO GLASSES!

Stinker Pugh needs beating up.



Oh, I haven’t got time right now – I’ll write this tomorrow.


First, let us be clear on one VERY important point; e-cigs are NOT a “smoking cessation” device. They are not promoted as such by any legitimate manufacturer or organisation. They are an ALTERNATE DELIVERY SYSTEM for nicotine.

E-cigs first emerged half a century ago. But serious examples only came on-line a DECADE ago, largely thanks to developments in battery technology.

And THOSE examples came from CHINA. Indeed, we MOSTLY have that country to thank for ten years R&D and manufacture of them.

Which raises a VITAL QUESTION which – as far as this writer knows – has NOT yet been ADDRESSED. But more of that later.

One thing that IS certain is that the L&B departments (lies and bullsh*t) of governments all over the World have gone into overdrive on the subject. Despite e-cigs clearly being FAR safer (1000 times, according to some research) than traditional tobacco cigarettes, governments have claimed they are as dangerous – or laughably, even MORE dangerous.

Now you do not need a triple-digit IQ to see why. Many governments RELY HEAVILY on the EXTORTIONATE TAX (1,000%+) which they levy on smokers of standard cigarettes – to RUN their countries.

And even those with double-digit IQs can see that since governments are happy to rake in that revenue, they would be unlikely to look kindly on a substitute that would BYPASS their collection of it.

Furthermore, since most people now have international bank cards and computers, if governments put massive taxes on e-cig “juice” – everyone would simply order it from countries that did not. Buying cigarettes online without involving customs is impractical, due to their SIZE – but little bottles of juice are another matter.

The cost of checking EVERY item of incoming small-packet mail would be prohibitive – and the TIME it would take would cause the international mail system to COLLAPSE.

So let us LOOK at those governments. They have long claimed to constantly increase (WELL above the rate of inflation) tobacco tax, in the interests of “health and safety” – so with e-cigs manifestly being FAR SAFER, WHY are they prepared to make themselves look ridiculous by coming down so heavily AGAINST them?

Well, only those with SINGLE-digit IQs could fail to see that the ALTERNATIVES to taxing tobacco would make governments even MORE unpopular than most already are. Hit beleaguered motorists for yet MORE taxes? Raise VAT? Income tax?

The population would revolt.

How about getting their fat-cat friends and big corporations to pay some REAL tax, eh? (Yeah, like THAT’S going to happen).

So, it’s just about the revenue then – or IS it? Here comes that vital question I spoke of earlier… 

Imagine THIS scenario. Tomorrow, all smokers – including Chinese ones – stop smoking tobacco and switch to e-cigs. What would happen?

Well, in China, about 50% of men – and 1% of women – smoke. But Chinese cigarettes only cost about a Pound (a buck sixty) a pack.

Thus in China, the loss of revenue from tobacco tax would EASILY be compensated for by (1) the HUGE SAVINGS in health-care, for those struck down by smoking-related diseases (2) the INCREASE IN JOBS, created by the manufacturing of e-cigs and juice and (3) the MAJOR BOOST in foreign trade from ALL OVER THE WORLD.

This last would be inevitable, given that while a number of Western tobacco giants have bought in HEAVILY to this new phenomenon – the Chinese are YEARS AHEAD of them.

While around the REST of the World, economies ALREADY reeling from the effects of the ’08/9 financial meltdown – caused by the Wall Street robber-barons, in concord with most of Congress – would be CRIPPLED.

Do you see what I’m getting at here? This thing has a SERIOUS POLITICAL dimension.

Major countries have ALWAYS been heavily invested in sabotaging each other’s economies in any way they can – without actually invoking WAR. And with China’s financial explosion having now begun to plateau, any measure which might create ANOTHER explosion there – would be MORE than welcome.

Now some might wonder whether the idiot governments around the World have THOUGHT of that. However, THIS writer is SURE of it – since it would EXPLAIN why they are prepared to look so absurd, by CONDEMNING and attempting to curtail e-cig use.

But I also believe that THIS time, they are doomed to FAILURE. Like King Canute, they cannot stem the inevitable. E-cigs WILL ultimately replace dirty, smelly, health-destroying, RIDICULOUSLY EXPENSIVE tobacco-based cigarettes. And they WILL have to find alternative ways of raising revenue.

And tobacco companies will FALL – or at least, be forced to segue into the manufacture of e-cigs and juice.

It is not a question of IF – only WHEN.


In the six years (wow, really?) I have been writing these columns, I have touched several times on “-isms” – racism, sexism and others.

But I believe all of these issues can be SUMMED UP quite simply – so here goes…

The factors that go to make up a human fall into two distinct groups.

Group One consists of – but is not limited to: age, race, nationality, colour, socio-economic background, IQ, sex, sexual orientation, height and disabilities.

While Group Two consists of – but is not limited to: creed, political orientation, values, tastes (music, clothes, food, etc.) lifestyle, goals, hobbies and habits.

And while it is DESPICABLE to criticise, belittle or attack someone over factors in Group One – it is ACCEPTABLE, over factors in Group Two.

The reason being that Group One’s factors are aspects of a person which they CANNOT CHANGE. They are BORN with them.

However, the factors in Group Two are all learned and developed, during a person’s lifetime. And they CAN CHANGE them.

Thus if you believe a person’s politics, values, religion or lifestyle is pants – by all means criticise, belittle or attack (verbally, of course) them.

But if you have issues with their race, colour, sexual orientation or IQ – KEEP THEM TO YOURSELF.


These days, Obama has accepted that no matter how much he tries to appease his government, they will continue to shit all over him and block – or at least dissipate – his every move.

His attempts at conciliation began even before he won office, during the debates with that little prat, McCain. And McCain’s reaction set the tone for what would follow.

So thus far – aside from nailing Bin Liner – Obama has been hog-tied by the most intransigent, lazy, BLOODY-minded Congress in history.

But now that he has become RESIGNED to the fact he is surrounded by right-wing arseholes – including that orange-faced prick, Boehner (who cannot even pronounce his own name properly) – he has finally realised that if he wants to get anything done, it is time to BECOME The Most Powerful Man In The World.

Which means using Presidential Privilege.

For my British readers, I should explain that unlike in your country, where the Speaker is non-partisan and the Prime Minister rules, the US President only has real power if he is a right-wing arsehole.

A Democratic one is about as much use as a one-legged man at an arse-kicking contest.

However he does have ONE weapon in his arsenal; Presidential (AKA Executive) Privilege. This is normally reserved for those times when a decision needs to be made that cannot be put through Channels (like the one he made, to nail the afore-mentioned Bin Liner).

But while its usage has always been more divergent – its definition has always been somewhat VAGUE. Thus in the past, Presidents have used it sparingly – like a fine wine.

Nevertheless, Obama has finally ripped the cork out and is preparing to drink straight from the bottle.

Of course, all of the right-wing arseholes are protesting at Barry’s cheek – spoiling their little game – and are talking of everything from impeachment to straight-up SUEING him. But he is unrepentant.

How far this long-overdue move will take him in his last two years in office – remains to be seen.

I for one wish him LUCK.

He will need it.


A while back, a swish New York shop called Barney’s hit the news when a black girl was roughed up by NYPD, after she had bought a handbag there, which cost two THOUSAND five hundred bucks.

The incident was similar to an earlier one, where a young black man had bought a belt for $349.

Apparently, neither of these people had done anything wrong. Both had paid for their purchases with legitimate debit cards.

Barney’s said THEY had not called the cops on either of the two customers – it appears the NYPD had a “fraud task force” operating independently, inside their shop.

But if that was true, why arrest the CUSTOMERS? Two-and-a-half GRAND for a HANDBAG? Three hundred and fifty for a BELT?

If anyone needed to be busted for FRAUD, it was BARNEY’S – for taking advantage of two SIMPLETONS – regardless of their colour.

More recently, a NINE-year-old girl was taken by her parents to an establishment in Arizona, called “Bullets And Burgers” (I swear I’m not making this up) where she was allowed to have a go with a gun (Arizona has no minimum age for this).

She was given an UZI by the instructor.

After letting her pop off a couple of rounds in single-shot mode – he switched it to full automatic. Understandably, the weapon got away from her and swung around in an arc, KILLING said instructor stone dead (the girl will likely still be in counselling when I’m pushing up the daisies).

No-one is being charged over the incident. The range’s owner said, “This was a very mature young lady… …what we’re kind of kicking around right now is like at Disneyland – you know; if you’re not this tall…” – and that appears to be that.

Of course, America is the place that brought the World to its knees during their Great Depression of 1929. And while measures were then brought in to prevent a repeat of that fiasco, they began REMOVING them twenty years ago – with predictable results.

Then in 1969, despite their thirteen-year Prohibition having showed them what would happen, Nixon’s America decided to go for a War On Drugs – AGAIN, with predictable results. Except this time, it has taken them nearly FIFTY years to BEGIN to acknowledge their error.

Thus today, they are AGONISINGLY slowly – state by state – starting to legalize marijuana.

Perhaps, once their entire population is STONED – Americans may FINALLY start to behave SENSIBLY…

–    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –    –

A response to the above…

Well, I’m a little late to the party here, but I wanted to weigh in on your observations regarding the legalization, or more often, decriminalization of the devil’s weed.

The US is so completely fractured as a society that we are nearly non-functional at this juncture. The inane right wing tea baggers have taken over the GOP, waving their bibles and KKK flags and still endlessly trotting out their anti-Obama rhetoric (“He’s a Muzzlim!” – “He’s a forrinner!” – “He’s a commie!”)…and the more reasonable members of the party are too terrified to stand up to them so it looks like the psycho roadshow and traveling curiosity that is the current Republican party will continue bumbling along with idiots like Ghomert, Ruiz, Bush III, Batshit Crazy Bachmann, Huckabee, Jindal, Walker, Santorum, et al continuing their mission to turn the United States into a proper theocracy (I firmly believe that they secretly admire ISIS and harbor a good deal of jealousy over their success).

And yet right square under the big top we have hard line right wingers joining forces with the progressive enemy in order to push for federal legalization of pot! I mean, this has been their war, created by the most famously criminal president in history as a measured response to his raging paranoia towards anyone under the age of thirty, all of whom he was certain were out to get him (they were).

So now tea party members are standing on libertarian ideals of personal freedom, coupled with dreams of new business and tax revenues, along with us democrats who just like to A) get stoned, B) listen to music, and C) not get busted.

Man, I mean this juggernaut of states flipping the bird to the feds would seem like the perfect excuse to hand over more armored vehicles, stun grenades, and assault weapons to police forces around the country (we have quite a few that are doing nothing right about now) but instead the misty-eyed dreamers can smell the big bucks in the air now that Colorado’s experiment not only greatly increased the general fund, but failed to bring the second coming of Christ (so far, at least, of course the predictions have had a marked upturn in the past few days following the SCOTUS gay marriage decision, but I digress).

I find it hilarious that in the midst of an era in which the gears of government have nearly ground to a halt over every possible decision, be it the ACA, our endless mingling in world affairs, the ever widening income gap, immigration reform, secret trade assignments, etc., etc…the one area in which we can finally begin to find some common ground appears to be over smoking dope.

What a time to be alive.

Excellent comment. Better than the article that inspired it! Therefore, I am “elevating” it from Comments to the piece itself. Thanks.


Charisma Carpenter is a now-middle-aged actress, mostly famous for PLAYING A SERIES of bimbos (for non-Americans; a bimbo is a woman without a brain in her head, who floats along on her looks).

Of course, that NAME (Charisma – her actual given name – after an Avon perfume) might have HELPED.

These days, she is still working – in bit parts. But perhaps her time is yet to come, as she bears a STARTLING resemblance to three REAL LIFE women – said to be the World’s LEADING bimbos; Sarah Palin (she’d only need specs) Michele Bachmann and (with a blonde wig and a wild-eyed look) Gretchen Carlson.

This is Charisma….

Charisma Carpenter

…there are plenty more revealing pics of her on the Interweb – but for this piece, all we need is her FACE.

This is Sarah Palin…

Sarah Palin


…this is Michele Bachmann…

Michele Bachmann


…and this is “crazy eyes” Gretchen Carlson…


None of these three women would have cause for complaint; after all, Charisma is a few years younger than ALL of them – and she has had a boob job.

But of course, a producer would say that none of their stories are COMPLETE yet.

And tragically, that would be correct…

Footnote! See


Elsewhere in these columns, I have written of how the publishers’ copyright ID computer programmes brought an end to new musical compositions around 1980.

But not only did this begin the descent of Pop, it also spelled the end for TV themes and jingles. And it is this last wot this piece is about.

For decades, the ad men had relied on catchy pieces of original music to move their employers’ products – but when that dried up, they began to look elsewhere.

Thus it was that in 1985, the creatives working on a Levi ad decided to use something evocative for their œuvre.

They came up with Marvin Gaye’s 1967 recording of “I Heard It Through The Grapevine” – but when they approached Motown records for clearance, the latter got SNIFFY.

And so they came up with an alternative. They assembled a Marvin Gaye impressionist and a musician who had been THERE when the track had been recorded.

With his help, they acquired vintage mics and equipment from specialist museums – and recreated the original line-up.

After a few takes, they were pleased with what they had done – but something was not quite right. Suddenly, the ex-Motown musician had a ‘eureka’ moment – he leapt up and yelled “HISS!”

He told them that the track had originally been laid down in a studio that was notorious for hiss. The producer said, “Oh yeah; I’ve got a mint-original copy of Marvin’s ‘That’s The Way Love Is’ – the hiss is CHRONIC on that one.”

“Well,” the engineer replied, “if you all bugger off and get a coffee, I can soon fix THAT.”

And so they all duly trooped off – and returned fifteen minutes later, to find a now-smug-looking engineer waiting.

He explained what he had done; ramped up the volumes to 11 on several of the mics, recorded five minutes of hiss onto a spare track – and mixed it in.

“I had to clear the studio,” he explained, “as just breathing would have been picked up – and if anyone had coughed, these cans would have blown my ears out. And I need my ears – I’m a recording engineer. It’s all I know how to do.”

He then proceeded to play their track back, with added hiss.

And in due course, it accompanied the Levi ad and made a star of Nick Kamen (who was only a model then).

But when the ad came out, Motown was shocked to discover that the public was clamouring at the doors of record shops (they still existed then) asking for copies of the record.

At which point, they hastily re-issued it and nearly twenty years after its original release, it sailed back up into the Top Ten.

And so a new fashion began. Now ALL ad men sought out classic tracks to accompany their wares – and most record companies were understandably happy to oblige.

Meanwhile, other record companies who had similar material but had not been approached – decided to jump on the band-waggon and re-release gems in similar veins.

But there was a problem; it was the Eighties – and you needed a MODERN VIDEO to accompany ANY single you released – or the all-important MTV would not play it.

However, Marvin Gaye had been shot by his psychotic father, who frowned on Marvin’s life-style, Jackie Wilson had died on stage – thanks in no small measure to Dick “Head” Clark – and Nina Simone had never been photogenic, even when YOUNG.

But after the success of the Levi ad, “…Grapevine” had again been used for an ad. This time, California Raisins – which had used CLAYMATION.

Thus this old tech suddenly found itself reborn – along with another; stop-motion.

Here are a couple of examples from MY uploads: first, Jackie Wilson’s “I Get The Sweetest Feeling” – (that’s Jackie on the TV) and then Nina Simone –



“Lucky” Larry Searle had never known what it felt like to be a “loser” – if he pulled a cracker, he would ALWAYS get the middle section.

His friends – of whom he had many – never ceased to be amazed how everything ALWAYS seemed to go his way.

Thus his career in Texan oil futures had made him rich – so much so, that he could afford to take a day off whenever he pleased. And it pleased him that day.

Sitting in his favourite car – a classic open-top T-Bird – he was powering along a lonely desert road, without a care in the World.

And since the weather that day was HOT, he was glad to see some inviting hills ahead. Aside from providing better scenery, it would also be cooler up there.

Checking the sky above and flat sands around, he saw no cops – so leaned even harder on the loud pedal.

The first hill was now imminent, so he eased back on the throttle – but he was still doing nearly eighty when IT HAPPENED…

POW! went the tyre. But Larry was as skillful as he was lucky – so resisted the temptation to hit the brakes. Instead, he simply lifted his foot off the accelerator and GENTLY corrected the car’s weaving as it slowed.

Finally, when the speed had reduced to about ten miles an hour, he steered the vehicle off the road onto a convenient piece of hard, flat ground.

Walking around the car, Larry saw what he had expected to see – the right rear tyre was VERY flat at the bottom.

He checked his mobile phone and that too showed what he had expected – no bars. But then again, to have gotten a signal way out here would not just have been lucky – it would have been a frickin’ MIRACLE.

In any case, he knew his spare was good and his car was on solid, flat ground. Time to do some WORK.

He bowled out the spare and found the jack and nut spanner. But as he performed the mundane task, it gave him time to consider; was this IT? Had his legendary luck finally run OUT??

As one of the nuts proved difficult (there was always ONE) he barely noticed as a police cruiser WHIZZED down the road, travelling in the direction he had been heading.

But just as he was finishing changing the wheel, it returned – now travelling slower – and parked up next to him.

The cop got out and ambled over to him. “Having some trouble?”

“Well, I was – but I guess it’s fixed now,” answered Larry.

“Good,” replied the cop, then he added, “But you don’t seem too happy about it.”

“Hmm. Well, this is gonna sound silly, but this sort of thing doesn’t HAPPEN to me. I’m sorta, well… BLESSED.”

“Really?” said the cop. “I’ll tell you what; I came out here to… listen, why don’t you follow me and I’ll SHOW you what I just did.”

Puzzled, Larry agreed – the cop seemed friendly enough and Larry had nothing to hide. And so the cop drove off with Larry following.

After half a mile, the cop slowed and Larry saw a temporary sign on the road’s shoulder. It read “EMERGENCY SLOW” in large letters.

And as they approached the blind bend around the hill, there was another – this one read “NO THRU ROAD” and was accompanied by a temporary barrier positioned right across the road.

The cop stopped – as did Larry – and then got out of his cruiser and motioned Larry to join him. They walked past the barrier and continued around the bend.

Larry gasped as he saw the sight. The iron bridge that had once straddled the three-hundred-foot-deep gorge behind the hill – had collapsed into it.

“I received a call from a unit on the other side – that’s why I didn’t stop to help you the first time I passed you. I was hurrying to erect these signs and barrier – we always carry ’em in our trunks.”

Larry gaped at the tangle of metal at the bottom of the gorge, picturing himself and his T-Bird splattered all over it.

The cop laughed. “So it looks like you’re STILL blessed, old son.”

_    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _

One day, YOU were headed to the company car park at the end of a work day, when you tripped on a loose flagstone and fell headlong onto the ground.

You CURSED as you picked yourself up, dusted yourself down – and noticed the scuff on the right knee of your second-best suit.

Eventually you reached your car, your right knee throbbing – and drove home without further incident.

As you passed a junction on the way, you failed to notice the truck parked a few hundred yards down one of the side roads – and even if you had, it would have meant nothing to you.

You had no way of knowing that one minute earlier – RIGHT at the time you WOULD have been passing through it, had you not had your humiliating and painful moment – the trucker had had a moment of his own.

Approaching the junction from the side-road, his brake-pedal had STUCK – leaving him no option but to cruise right through the main road and hope for the best.

His luck – and YOURS – had been IN that day. The side-road on the other side had also been clear, allowing him to double-declutch his vehicle to a stop and park up.

And after he had made a mental note to change his underwear as soon as possible – he had called his company to arrange for a tow-in.

But you could have known NOTHING of this – so don’t think it didn’t happen.

_    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _

But what do these two stories tell us?

Well, it is a solid fact that given (unless we live on a desert island or in a hole in the ground) MILLIONS of things happen to us during our lifetimes – it would only be a statistical anomaly if a FEW of them did NOT wildly coincide.

And on the same principle, in is inevitable that we will have “runs” of good and bad luck.

However, it is human nature to IGNORE the many MUNDANE happenstances that fill our days, obsessing (that’s a VERB these days) about the handful of EXTRAORDINARY ones that occur. And attributing to them some special quality.

But only a FOOL believes in luck, fate, destiny, karma or “the lap of the gods” – or even a god. We make our OWN luck in this World.

And as for the rest; fact is, stuff just HAPPENS – what we MAKE of it is entirely SUBJECTIVE.

But thanks to the “butterfly” or “ripple” effect (events which trigger other events, which in turn trigger… etc.) happenings we might THINK OF as being BAD luck – might VERY WELL trigger ones that for us are major, even life-saving GOOD LUCK.

Some of which we might recognise – and others we have NO chance of even KNOWING about.

So the next time something BAD happens to you – provided it leaves you with your bodily bits and pieces pretty much INTACT – remember it might JUST have triggered something monumentally GOOD in your life. You might even have dodged a MASSIVE BULLET.

You see, as far as LUCK is concerned, there IS none. Just events. And more events. And yet MORE events. Their effects simply being what they are. And over our lifetimes – fortune-wise – they all tend to even out anyway.

Yin and Yang, baby.


This writer has mentioned before how Americans have changed the spellings, use and usage of as many words as they can, in order to try to convince themselves – if nobody else – that THEY invented the Language Of Shakespeare.

But a bizarre new example of this silliness has impinged itself on this historian’s ear; they now SWAP the words “like” and “love” AROUND.

This is just plain WEIRD; these two words have both been around for CENTURIES – with VERY specific definitions for each.

Do Americans REALLY imagine that the rest of the World is going to dutifully CHANGE these words’ meanings after all this time – simply because paranoid Yanks FEAR the word “love”?

If so, our ex-colonial friends – as they themselves would say – NEED TO GET REAL.


Having escaped cold, wet, miserable Britain twelve years ago, I have not seen too many of their TV ads during that time. But those which I have caught have featured a trend which is DEEPLY annoying; a line of qualifiers, links and disclaimers – in a compressed font – running across the bottom of the picture.

Now, given I have rarely watched LIVE television since obtaining my first VCR in 1982, ads are not a major problem for me – obviously, I skip over them. And since my current PVR allows me to progress in thirty-second hops, these days I am rarely even troubled by the brand-names.

However I have watched the few BRITISH ads that have come my way, just out of curiosity. And those ever-present lines of compressed print are a major DISTRACTION. It is like trying to look someone in the eyes when they are wearing an absurd wig – or have a disgusting wart – or big tits.

In fact my first thought when I saw “T&Cs apply” was that the letters STOOD for the naughty bits of a woman – but then I decided they must mean “Terms And Conditions” – right?

Anyhoo, I suppose at least SOME of this crap is forced upon the ad-makers by the Advertising Standards Authority (or whatever they are called today). It was those guys who were responsible for one of the LAMEST series of ads ever, back in the Nineties. I am referring to the Whiskas’ “Eight Out Of Ten Cats” campaign.

For those too young to remember; around 1988, an ad premiered that featured a “panel” of ten people whom we were told had taken part in a “test” where they had had to determine which cat food their pet preferred.

And like on some mediocre game-show, they pressed buttons and ten screens lit up – two of them displayed brand X, while the remaining eight came up Whiskas. Thus the slogan – “In tests, eight out of ten cat-owners said their cat preferred Whiskas” – was born.

This slogan was then used for YEARS – until someone blabbed to the ASA that during the tests, their cat had eaten anything put in front of it – at which point, the ASA acted.

But instead of finally DUMPING the whole dreary campaign, Whiskas’ ad-men simply CHANGED the slogan to “In tests, eight out of ten cat-owners – who expressed a preference – said their cat…(etc.)” – how lame was THAT?!

Eventually, the whole thing collapsed when a rival company began a far more MODERN and infinitely BETTER campaign simply featuring a cute girl feeding their product to an even cuter cat.

Which nowadays leaves “Eight Out Of Ten Cats” solely as the title of a comedy panel show – which it uses ironically.


This too is hardly topical – in fact the events I wish to consider happened almost twenty years ago.

But after my Zen brother Corny recently wrote a piece on racism – – I was reminded of said event.

If you are over thirty, you probably recall it too. Eric got into a ruck with another player and was sent off. But as he passed through the tunnel, a “fan” shouted racist abuse at him – at which point Eric leapt into the crowd and launched a “kung fu” style attack on him.

The upshot of this attack was that Eric was heavily penalised by the FA and received a two-week prison sentence – reduced on appeal to community service – from the courts, for his actions.

Fair enough – after all, “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words/names can never hurt me.”

And whilst the “fan” may have acted both foully and aggressively, he did not launch a PHYSICAL attack on Cantona. Thus Cantona’s actions could not have been countenanced in law.

However, while Eric was rightly ashamed of his part in the drama, it is a fact that the British public were DELIGHTED by his actions.

Indeed, said actions were at least in part responsible for RAISING his career profile – including in the eyes of people who had no interest in football whatsoever and who thus would never have heard of him, had it not been for the “kung fu” incident.

All of which goes to highlight what I see as a FAILING in the British character: next to pædophilia, nothing is guaranteed to inflame its passions more than racism.

Which is fine, provided one does not lose sight of everything else.

Granted that “fan” was an excrescence – but Eric’s actions were NOT justified.

Two wrongs do not make a right. Racism is an evil – but then so is the violence it often leads to. And the one does not justify the other.

Of course today, in Britain, the Cantana incident would be unlikely to recur. If a “fan” behaved like the one did on that day – the CROWD would give him a kicking…


Anthony Weiner

Okay, this is hardly TOPICAL – but I’ve been doing a SLOW BURN on this one.

After a rocky political career, MARRIED Anthony Weiner “sexted” pictures of his gentleman-sausage to a number of women.

The scandal broke, his wife stood beside him (why do they always DO that?) – and that SHOULD have been that.

But no. Two years on, he decides to run for MAYOR OF NEW YORK!!


Had he done anything like that in my day, far from just quitting politics, he would have had to quit ANY public career (except possibly the “adult movie” industry) – and indeed, “decent society” in general.

As for today; had a French version of him run for Mayor of Paris, even the French – who are notoriously FORGIVING of politicians’ sexual indiscretions – would have said “NON!”

Every night, during his campaign, ALL the late night chat-shows’ monologues featured him as their main story – with a name like Weiner, he was tailor-made.

In fact, in my day, he would have had to change that NAME in order to have run for ANYTHING.

This could ONLY have happened in America – although to be fair to them, less than 5% of New York’s votors actually VOTED for him.

And I’m sure they were LAUGHING as they did so…


Ah, the Fifties. Life was SIMPLER then. You could jump on a bus at the traffic lights – and they ran FASTER, thanks to the driver not having to collect FARES at each stop.

And you could smoke just about ANYWHERE – except libraries, museums, churches, art galleries and theatres (but no-one went THERE). Even NON-smokers always kept ashtrays and cigarettes for GUESTS – instead of sending you into the garden, like they do now.

People were more RELAXED. In those days, if you could STAND, you could DRIVE – forget blood/alcohol limits. And if you interfered with a boy’s shorts, people didn’t make the FUSS they do now – “Oh, that’s just Uncle Norman’s WAY.”

Plus there was none of that pill nonsense – you used a rubber johnny when you had sex. So personal hygiene wasn’t an issue either. Which was just as well, given only the rich had indoor bathrooms.

And you didn’t have to worry about whether you could LAUGH at a joke, like you do now. Casual racism was only a bit of fun and darkies were good sports mostly. And women too.

Of course, you had to be TOUGH to survive to adulthood. None of that mamby-pamby synthetic clothing and bed-clothes. Again, only the RICH had central heating, while YOU had to make do with cotton and wool. Half a ton of which on your bed made breathing a CHALLENGE, as you watched the clouds of condensation rise upwards.

Then there was the MUSIC. Oh, not that Rock ‘N’ Roll stuff – that was just for the greasers who roared up and down the A1 on their motorbikes (there were no SPEED LIMITS then) and listened to it on transport cafe jukeboxes. No, the BBC played Miki and Griff, Alma Cogan and Mantovani – PROPER music. Not that RACE crap.

And you didn’t get LOONIES (you could CALL them that in those days) walking the streets. Weirdos, eccentrics, single mothers and the like were banged up where they BELONGED – in ASYLUMS. And poofs were JAILED – although locking up a shirt-lifter with six hundred men was perhaps not thinking it through.

Of course, there WAS always the risk of nuclear annihilation. But just duck under a table and you’d be fine – and avoid drinking milk for a couple of years.

Also, murderers got what they DESERVED – they got HUNG. And most of them were guilty, too.

Ah, yes – the Fabulous Fifties. They’re not coming back…


In America, the career of Bob Newhart is well known.

It began with two chart-topping albums: “The Button-Down Mind Of Bob Newhart” and “The Button-Down Mind Strikes Back” – then continued with more hit albums – his own show – Vegas headline runs – regular appearances on top shows (Carson, Dean Martin, Ed Sullivan, etc.) – then TWO successful sitcoms in the ’70s and ’80s – plus many film and television spots. At 84, he still occasionally works – he guested on “The Big Bang Theory” only months ago.

But in Britain, his profile is a bit different.

While his two sitcoms and The Big Bang Theory all aired, back in the Sixties (apart from a few clips) his US TV appearances were UNSEEN by British audiences. Then, it was all about his RECORDS.

But while records in America in the Sixties were reasonably priced, in Britain, thanks to PRICE-FIXING by the major record companies, they cost a FORTUNE. His first two albums, released in 1960-1, cost Brits A DAY’S WAGES – EACH.

This meant that those who could afford to buy them – played them through to the FELT.

But for the rest of us, Bob’s gems still got heard. With Pop records of the day rarely being longer than two minutes, when BBC DJs needed a “bathroom break” – they would stick on one of his tracks (Auntie COULD afford to buy albums). The favourite was “Driving Instructor” – which was just over eight minutes long – and later, “Introducing Tobacco Into Civilization” – which ran a little over six.

The result of all this was that when Bob came over to Britain in the early Seventies, when he performed these two masterpieces – HE COULD SEE PEOPLE LIPS MOVING ALONG TO THEM!

However, my personal favourite from those years is a lesser-known classic, “Defusing A Bomb”. It still cracks me up – FIFTY YEARS on. I put it up on YouTube three years ago. It currently has 165,000 hits.

If you want to add another, you can find it on – ENJOY!


Take two guys: the first is Nigel Farage – the leader of UKIP (for the benefit of American readers: UKIP is like the Tea Party, but without the guns) and a “Man Of The People”…

Nigel Farage

And the second is another Man Of The People – Jay Leno, former host of The Tonight Show…

Jay Leno

Now clearly, something is WRONG here. While Mr Farage has a face that is WAY too BIG for his head – Mr Leno’s is way too SMALL.

Hence the title of this piece. BOTH of these men need HELP…


I rarely have time to read blogs – but searching for something on the above-named programme (which I only caught up with yesterday) I stumbled across the below piece, from “theresidentweeble”, here on THIS service…

“Well, all the build-up was worth it, ‘The Day of the Doctor’, a fabulous episode to celebrate 50 years of Dr Who was had. But they couldn’t let it lie. The BBC thought, let’s do an after show party, and let’s film it live. That may have sounded good at the time I’m sure, but it wasn’t.

“Live TV rarely works out these days and to make it work best takes a lot of preparation and rehearsal. This appeared to have little or none of that. Hosted by an over caffeinated breathless Zoe ball and the most insincere man who’d I’d never heard of. Zoe interviewed some of the past cast and crew of Dr who, putting her head down to read the questions of her lap and not giving these people who were kind of the point of the show to fully answer.

“The questions asked to guests and fans were all so generic: Did you like the episode? What’s was your best memory of filming it? What was your favourite enemy that you fought (asked to a chap who only appeared in a handful of episodes). Then the answers were just as bad: Yes I loved the episode, I thought it was fantastic. Although one chap said it was like a dirty movie for him. That was funny.

“For some reason the BBC thought chatting to a couple of the One Direction members via satellite link up to LA was a good idea. Even if the delay of 5 seconds and feedback and all manner of f*ck ups hadn’t happened, what the flying f*ck have One Direction got to do with Dr Who anyway?

“At one point they made all the companions do a game that confused not only the viewing public, but also those involved. They all stood up and were told to “sit down if they hadn’t run down a corridor” and sometimes it would be “sit down if you have said ‘What’s this?’ to the Doctor”. Or “stay standing if you haven’t tripped and fell.” It was very odd and kind of demeaning.

“This was mostly awful telly. I like the facts spat out by K9 in a pre-recorded segment, but other than that it felt like it was stapled on the end of a big deal show at the last minute as a come down drug to counter the massive build-up. As come downs go, I’m betting Smack isn’t much worse.”

The responses were as follows…

SudoOne: I’m glad I chose to write with it on mute. You describe it very well. I hated Zoe “I’m on radio so I can look at my notes” Ball on the Capaldi reveal show so no surprise she’s shit here!

Shocked-Who-Fan: Multiple car crash television! I watched aghast! I agree with you that it was an insult to everyone’s intelligence. I wanted to screech, “EXTERMINATE!”

And finally, ME: I wholeheartedly agree with every word you wrote – you saved me the trouble. The one thing I’d add is the APPALLING treatment of Jean Marsh.

Jean Marsh

The woman is SHOWBIZ ROYALTY. And having shlepped down to this monumental waste of time (the woman is 79 and not in the best of health) all she got was, “and here’s Jean Marsh” – and after she’d nodded and smiled, that was IT.

F*CK! They could have done a whole programme just on HER – “The Twilight Zone”, “Upstairs Downstairs” and a SLEW of film and TV appearances – plus her writing and producing (she CO-CREATED “Upstairs Downstairs”) – not to mention her marriage to Jon Pertwee and her associations with other important showbiz figures.

It would certainly have been a more interesting programme than THIS tosh. I FEEL for her – she has earned little from the WEALTH of material she has starred in and created. And “Downton Abbey” is essentially a rip-off of her “Upstairs Downstairs”.

As she once said of that show, “If it had been made in America I’d be Mary Tyler Moore. As it is, I’m Mary Tyler Less.”

–         –         –         –         –         –         –         –         –         –         –

Actually, now I’m back in MY den, I’ll add something ELSE…

They had “the biggest collection of Companions ever assembled” in the studio – and all we got was Zoë Ball (vintage BBC presenter Johnny’s kid and wife of the agreeable Norman Cook – AKA “Fatboy Slim”) and some bloke whittering on and ON, occasionally asking inane questions to the assembled guests (who were clearly waiting for the whole sorry mess to conclude, so they could do something USEFUL) – interspersed with clip compilations.

The Whovian viewers must have been having fantasies – not about Zoë (now 43, but still quite cute) – but about taking the director of the show out onto the BBC car park… …and running the sod down with a BBC O.B. TRUCK!!!


I just heard that Britain (the land of my birth) is rated number 17 on the list of the World’s LEAST Corrupt countries.

So out of some 200-plus recognised nations, that means she is in pretty good shape, right?

Or IS she?

The thing is, casting aside the consideration that WELL-organised corruption goes undetected (and therefore logically would not be INCLUDED in the stats) exactly what PARAMETERS are they using?

I mean, there is your obvious, basic corruption: Brown Envelopes – then your more sophisticated corruption: Favours, Perks and the like – and finally, borderline stuff involving “Relationships”.

All of which rather goes against the British style of Fair Play (then again, these days…)

However one is left wondering whether consideration was given to the INSTITUTIONAL corruption with which Britain is riddled.

Like the fact that for almost a CENTURY now, the main two parties have systematically FIXED the electoral borders to virtually ENSURE no third party can ever take over from them.

For full details on THAT one, see a prophetic piece I wrote in these columns four years ago – just as Cleggy was trying to make what would eventually prove to be the WORST decision of his life…

THIS kind of corruption is part of the FABRIC of Britain – but was it considered as such by the people who created their World Corruption list? One suspects not.

For if it had, Britain would most likely have charted as the 17th MOST Corrupt country in the World.


When one is a child, all sustenance, caring and wisdom comes from one’s parents. Therefore, as a child, one’s parents are effectively GODS. But when one grows up, one quickly comes to realize they actually have feet of clay – which leaves one feeling rather alone.

And thus it has been, ever since Man first gained the power of THOUGHT.  But once he BEGAN to think, he put enormous effort into trying to overcome the problem. Looking around, the first thing he noticed was the Sun. It gave him warmth, light – and plants didn’t seem to grow in the shade. Therefore in a triumph of logic, he surmised that the Sun was God.

But then, he realised that this could not be the entire story. Water seemed to be kind of important too. And without earth… So pretty soon, he became convinced that they too must be gods. And with that realization, since men were his only point of reference, he attributed to them man-like qualities. And so began to worship them. And give sacrifices to them.

Further on down the line, Man developed civilizations. And with those civilizations (the Greeks, the Romans) came development of those early ideas. They devised gods for EVERYTHING that seemed important. Wine, love, travel – you name it, they had a god for it. But this got ridiculous – enter mono-theism.

A single god was easier to handle, but Man needed some sort of connection with this deity, thus he came up with prophets, sons-of, holy men, witch-doctors – again, you name it.

But since civilizations had their differences, it was inevitable that their religions would vary also. And since religious devotion had become so powerful, that devotion would lead to “holy wars”. Thus much blood was spilled over whose gods were best.

But eventually, Man grew UP. He invented SCIENCE, which provided answers to the questions of the creation of the Universe, the way the World worked and the evolution of himself. At least, by now that’s what SHOULD have happened – but it hasn’t has it?

The absurdities of Man’s modern religions are mind-boggling.

The simplest question, which a five-year-old can ask, but which the most intelligent theologian in the World cannot answer, is, “If God made Man, who made God?”

Then there are the variations. Given that the major religions are markedly different in their beliefs, it stands to reason that they can’t ALL be right. Which means that anyone claiming THEIR religion is the only “true” one is, by inference, dismissing the followers of all other religions as a bunch of poor deluded saps.

In fact, religions are a bit like washing liquids and powders – they all do much the same job, but all of their manufacturers claim that only THEIRS washes RIGHT.

But what job DOES religion do? Well, they do many. Going back to that primitive Man, they answer the unanswerable questions – what is the purpose/meaning of life – sort of. And they give people a father-figure. Someone to ask for stuff. Help, comfort – a good crop.

And of course, they calm the fear which EVERYONE has of DEATH, by promising some sort of after-life – from the Happy Hunting Ground to Heaven. And they also enable men to CONTROL other men by offering up threats of the OPPOSITE, if they don’t behave.

But if that were true, where would the cut-off point be? We all live lives filled with good and bad deeds (see “Good And Evil”, elsewhere in these ramblings) so how much evil can you do and STILL make it to the good place? With some religions, seemingly plenty – provided you can get a “holy man” to give you absolution just before you die.

And if Man is born in God’s image, it follows that God looks like Man. But what would HE do with reproductive organs? And where do WOMEN come in all of that?

And if God is perfect, why do some religions make “alterations” to babies? “Lord, your work is ALMOST perfect, but we want to make just ONE little ‘improvement’…”

Okay, at this point I am forced to skip over the many, MANY other absurdities of individual religions for fear of bringing down a ton of CRAP upon myself – as I’ve said elsewhere, these are just words, people – and make just one more point…

A person’s religion – or belief system – is developed over their life- time, so why do God-Squads CONTINUE to believe they can CHANGE people’s beliefs, on a door-step, in half an hour? Don’t they realize the only “conversions” they will achieve will be amongst the lonely, the desperate, the vulnerable – and people whose soaps are about to start on TV?

[For more on this, check out… ]


It is now widely accepted that rabidly anti-gay men are mostly gay themselves – but being unable to come to terms with their sexuality, overcompensate by railing against those who have.

So is Vladimir Putin a fruit? Let us examine the evidence…

(1) His government has introduced anti-gay legislation (I wonder how THAT went down at the Bolshoi Ballet).

(2) He waxes.

(3) He has the name of a Russian porn star (put-in?)

(4) He wears his hair short.

(5) And he goes shirtless at every opportunity.

Should there remain any doubt, I offer the following…


Boeing 777-200ER Malaysia Airlines 9M-MRO

…which is (was?) in fact the above aeroplane.

I think it is a given that somewhere in Bel Air, the first two acts of the forthcoming film, “The [TBA] Of Flight 370”, are being written as I type. And I further suspect that casting is already in progress.

But whether or not the film actually gets green-lit – will depend largely on how the third act plays out.

Certainly, at this pre-production stage, the drama seems tailor-made for Hollywood…

First you have the mysterious disappearance of an airliner.

Then comes the red herring of the two Iranian men travelling on stolen passports – who merely turn out to be illegal immigrants.

After which all sorts of shenanigans occur, with a variety of countries holding back vital information, for fear of compromising their own technical capabilities.

But suddenly things take a dramatic turn when it emerges that after the aircraft’s transponder was switched off – in two stages, therefore likely by a person – its two Rolls Royce engine’s mini-transponders continued to function (ping) for four more hours.

Plus it then transpires that an assortment of military satellites were picking up other signals from her (but originating from where, they cannot – or will not say) for a further three.

Which, given that the plane’s electrics would have had to be working for this, means she had to have been in one piece for at least seven hours after contact was lost.

At which point attention turns to the pilots – who are straight out of Central Casting.

In the left seat is a grizzled veteran of 30-years-plus, while the right is occupied by a 27-year-old flying enthusiast, with a home-made simulator in his bedroom, from which he has uploaded a number of videos to YouTube.

Further, it is revealed that in the past, he has casually invited women up onto the flight deck for a look-see.

Thus both of these men are now under scrutiny – however it seems to me they are another red herring. They were not routinely paired, nor had they asked to be – which rather rules them out of any “plot”.

And while the younger man might be something of a free-wheeler, there is nothing to suggest that either he or his captain are evil.

But the same cannot be said for the various investigating teams. They claim no credible demands have been received from any group, but as we have seen in the past – their veracity is suspect.

It could very well be that as I type this, “high-level” negotiations are in progress for the release of the Boeing 777, along with its 239 passengers and crew.

Which brings us to that third act.

It surprises me that so far no-one (at least, not on CNN or the Beeb) has mentioned the obvious: the airliner could currently be parked in a hangar somewhere in a certain country ruled by a chubby man whose hair looks like he cut it himself, in the dark, with blunt scissors.

Why? Well, it was on its way to China.

Now that would make a third act.

Of course it is all too easy for me to sit here formulating this amusing theory. If the story does have a tragic outcome, I can simply delete the whole piece. Which is something a print journalist cannot do – if it ended in tears, he would be scarred for life.

And so we all wait…


…which is another 80 million bucks-worth of SFX-movie, for kids.

And provided it makes shedfulls of cash, the producers have promised it will spawn (that’s definitely the right word) SEQUELS. But what will they be called? Here are my suggestions…

First sequel: “Trivergent” – second sequel: “Quadravergent” – etc.

And if they do a “prequel” – how about “Monovergent”?

Then polish off the series with “Polyvergent”.


As I type this, the 2014 Oscars are in full flow (having PVRed it, I’ll skip through it later). And this represents the climax of the “awards season” – but there really should be another: The Bullsh*t Awards.

These would be conferred upon those in Western Big Business who have created the biggest pile (of bullsh*t, not just money) over the last year. And this has been a stellar year.

You have doubtless seen the re-appearance of ads trying to guilt people into avoiding “pirate” goods, by telling them they are funding terrorism.

But of course, they make no mention of the fact that if the goods being “pirated” were available at reasonable prices, said “pirating” would not exist.

So when people see copies of “name brand” goods being made at the factories next door and at the SAME QUALITY – but a tenth of the price – they figure why pay a fortune to Western ad-men and CEOs?

In any case, the terrorism argument is specious. If Big Business rips people off for goods they need, it is the same as when governments ban something desirable – like recreational drugs. The end result is they empower criminals. And organised crime often has links with terrorists.

The fault lies not with the consumer, but with Western Big Business and government.

And the fact they are one and the same does not help.

But thanks to the Interweb, this fact no longer controls the public’s spending habits.

Which has led to another recent development: the West’s persecution of Indian companies.

Manufacturing drugs like sildenafil citrate and selling them for one tenth of the rip-off price Pfizer arrogantly charges – has enraged the company that STUMBLED across this wonder-drug.

For fifteen years, this company – thanks to their control of Western governments – has managed to keep Viagra generics OUT of Western pharmacies.

But now that most people can obtain them direct, via the Interweb, Pfizer’s profits are DOWN. Oh boo-hoo.

And so these Big Businesses are trying to force the governments in their pockets to demonise those Indian companies.

However, it is a fact that for the most part, the Indian companies are only doing what they SHOULD – manufacture goods at fair prices which their Third World customers can afford.

The bottom line to this is that the World is DIVIDED. In the West, consumers can AFFORD to pay rip-off prices – but those in the Third World can NOT.

Here in Thailand – and neighbouring countries – cigarettes cost a tenth the price Westerners pay. And drugs and other goods likewise. If Western prices applied, they could not afford to buy ANYTHING.

For decades, this divide was contained by Customs, but following the 2008 Crash (caused by Western government giving Wall Street free rein – with predictable results) Western consumers have felt the PINCH. And so, thanks to the Interweb, the LEAKAGE between the two Worlds has become a FLOOD.

And it’s a flood no amount of bullsh*t from Western Big Business and government is going to STAUNCH.


The three stars of Ishtar

You could be forgiven for believing Elaine May’s “Ishtar” was one of the five biggest financial disasters in Hollywood – the others being Michael Cimino’s “Heaven’s Gate”, “Waterworld” with Kevin Costner, “Gigli” with Ben Affleck and “The Bonfire Of The Vanities” with Tom Hanks, Bruce Willis and others.

But you would be WRONG. These five films are merely the most FAMOUS fiscal flops (alliteration!)

There are DOZENS that equal and even surpass them. Ever heard of “Mars Needs Moms”? Precisely.

Released (or more properly – escaped) just three years ago, THAT box-office bomb barely clawed back twenty of the one hundred and fifty big ones it cost to make.

And back in the days of the Studio System, the number of films that are considered to be classics today – is equalled by those that just DISAPPEARED.

The studios figured that releasing them would cost more in DAMAGE to their studio and stars than the bombs would net – so cut as much usable material (like battle scenes which could be used as stock footage) from them as possible and BURNED the rest.

However now that the Studio System is long gone, EVERYTHING gets SOME sort of release.

Thus “Ishtar”, which cost $55M to make (a big budget in 1987) was eventually released, netting just $7M at the US box office.

But this does not tell the whole story. The worldwide figures are unavailable – then you have to factor in video, TV and latterly, DVD rights. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to assume that overall, the movie is still a long way short of covering its production costs.

These were worsened by the studio’s insistence on giving the film high production values. The reason being that having heavyweights like Dustin Hoffman and Warren Beatty (who had championed Elaine May in the first place) on board, they were not about to scrimp it.

Which is the film’s first problem. Elaine had envisioned it as a “Road To…” movie (although it comes across more like those Sixties Bond spoofs – like “Danger Route” and “Our Man In Marrakesh”) with a modest budget, shot locally – not an epic, part-made in Morocco.

Furthermore, the studio insisted on paying both its lead actors a fortune – while both would have been happy with far less.

To make things worse, the political situation in North Africa at the time was TENSE.

Then to cap it all, just as the film was nearing completion, David Puttnam (now LORD Puttnam) was brought in as the studio’s new head of production. He hated Beatty, Hoffman and production cost waste in equal measure – and publicly condemned the movie on the basis of all three.

And all along the way, there had been a plethora of problems and fallouts too numerous to mention here – all of which conspired to CAPSIZE the film before it had a chance.

So what is “Ishtar” actually LIKE? Well, most of those who decried it never even SAW it. It is actually not that bad.

Beatty and Hoffman’s chemistry is pretty good, Charles Grodin is as funny as ever – and the “blind” camel steals every scene he is in (the camel originally “signed” for the part got eaten instead).

Plus Paul Williams’ songs are realistically awful (Beatty and Hoffman play bad singer-songwriters) Dave Grusin’s score is fine, May’s script and direction is okay (although after “Ishtar”, she never got to direct another movie) and altogether the film lopes along agreeably, never becoming boring (which is more than can be said for the other four films listed above).

So if you find this piece in your DVD hire shop or it turns up on your TV schedules – give it a try.

It may not be in my All Time Top Ten Movie list – or even my top hundred – but it is NOT as bad as many would have you believe.

On its original release, it was well received at its three premieres, hit Number One at the box office during its opening week – and almost all of IMDb’s 121 reviews (written by actual PEOPLE) are POSITIVE.

And it is now available on Blu-Ray.

I finally saw it a few days ago on DiggerMovie HD and LOLed many times (particularly during the scenes involving that camel). And as Elaine herself once said, “If all of the people who hate “Ishtar” had SEEN it – I would be a rich woman today.”


A while back, the A-list star’s star slipped a bit – when he delivered a political speech to an empty chair. But in fairness, even HE laughs about it now. It just seemed like a good idea at the time.

But the points he lost then have now been recovered – he just saved a guy’s LIFE, by performing the Heimlich Manœuver on him.

Like Herpes, only Americans seem to suffer from getting food stuck in their throats – perhaps it is because they hold their forks incorrectly.

Anyhay, in this instance, Mr Eastwood was on hand – saw the man was in distress and with three heaves, dislodged the obstacle. He then got him a glass of water – and even added a twist of lemon.

What a prince. And Clint is 83 now, too…

Of course, the man he saved now has a story he can dine out on for LIFE – which it would NOT have been, had the man performing the manœuver been Lindsey Graham (see


I love Americans – they are emotional, creative and good fun.

But while I am happy to eat a McDonalds fishburger and chips, swilled down with Coke – and watch “Dexter”, “House”, “The Blacklist”, “Elementary”, “The Dome” (two of which star ENGLISH actors) and Jon Stewart, Dave Letterman et al on my TV – I still get pissed off how the British are happy to absorb their CULTURE as well.

An English friend sees American culture as being a PART of British culture – but I do NOT. And in an attempt to explain why, I am reproducing (so remember, this wasn’t originally written for this column) the end of an e-mail I recently sent him…

…regarding this business of Americanisms infecting the World – I think where we differ is that you consider Britain to be a PART of America and I don’t. Thus it is a case of one country sticking its nose up the arse of another – which is to be deplored and ridiculed.

I mean, we are ALL of us “related” – if you wanna go back far enough (religious [*****]s would claim back to Adam and Eve, about 10,000 years ago, somewhere around modern-day Croydon). But we have since EVOLVED into different cultures – and are right to be PROUD of our efforts.

Of course I’m not one of those prats who would take up ARMS to defend them. “My country, right or wrong” is bollocks – Schurz ACTUALLY said: “my country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right” – but many Americans have truncated and subverted his quote to justify their country’s APPALLING foreign policy record. And (false) patriotism is indeed the last refuge of a scoundrel (from Johnson).

But I get irked when people SURRENDER to attempts to subvert and dominate MY CULTURE – such as it is.

Patriotism? Nah – not really. Just a local identity. Like, I came over all unnecessary when I viewed the ACTUAL painting of Constable’s “Haywain”. It’s f[**]kin’ ENORMOUS – and postcards do it NO justice.

But the reason I teared up was because it reminded me of an identity that I didn’t even realise I HAD.

And all to the soundtrack of Vaughan Williams’ Greensleeves – or Elgar’s Nimrod. [******], hit THIS (and listen to the WHOLE 2’48”) to maybe FEEL what I’m banging on about…

John Constable's 'The Haywain'


As a Brit, I usually have little interest in US senators – particularly Republican ones. But the first time I saw Lindsey, I was fascinated.

His parents – who ran a booze shop (US: liquor store) called “The Sanitary Cafe” (really?) and were called Millie and Florence James Graham (again, REALLY?) – gave him the unisex name, Lindsey.

From this gender-confused beginning, he rose through academia and the military, eventually becoming a lawyer. According to The Hill, he styled himself a Gulf War Veteran, despite only having “served” as a legal eagle – who never left South Carolina.

Under George Wan… sorry, WaLker Bush, he rose to the rank of Colonel.

Col. Lindsey Grayham

Then for the next few years, he took a back seat in America’s foreign adventures.

But this “career” ran parallel to his political ambitions. I will not bore you with his rise through THOSE ranks – the SIDE DETAILS are far more interesting.

He was part of the movement that sought – unsuccessfully – to impeach Bill Clinton over his indiscretions with a certain chubby intern.

He described Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito – whom some claimed was sexist and racist – to be “a decent, honourable man”.

He stated that Free Speech was a “great idea” – except when you were at war.

He proposed a measure classifying the American-born children of illegal immigrants as illegal too.

He has been given an “A” rating by the NRA – meaning America’s gun-nuts consider him a friend.

Of course, he opposed “Obamacare”.

And he championed pre-emptive military action against Iran.

But it is his stance on Gay Marriage – and adoption – that flagged him on MY radar. He is against them.

Now up until I heard that, I had always ASSUMED he was GAY. I mean, just LOOK at him…

Lindsey Graham

Plus the fact he has never married or produced offspring.

However on reflection, this anomaly is not really surprising. It is a well-known fact that most rabidly homophobic guys are in fact gay themselves, but are unable – due to peer-pressure, upbringing, religion or a combination of those things – to accept their sexual orientation.

And so they “over-compensate” by adopting a strong anti-gay position – until the inevitable “expose” splashes all over the tabloids.

I suppose we will just have to wait for THAT…


I just finished repairing the underneath of an old pair of trousers I use mostly for gardening and suchlike – and it occurred that while Justin Beiber might appear a total DILDO in the trousers HE wears (the ones that look like he took a massive DUMP in them) at least their crotches never need stitching…

Once again, I am “promoting” a comment exchange to the piece itself…

I always wonder why pants began to be lowered by working class youths of today. Was it because belts were abandoned? But why?

You have me there. The gullible young got the PEE taken out of them by jeans manufacturers, who convinced them that “square” cut ones were “cool” – one size fitted NO-ONE. The result was they began to fall DOWN. About that time, some dick-head thought leaving the laces on trainers undone was “cool” too.

Well, there is certainly nothing funnier than watching a “cool” youth kicking a can – then smiling as his trainer goes sailing through the air – and falling about laughing as he runs to recover it and his JEANS FALL DOWN!!!


Elsewhere in these ramblings, I have ruminated on how America has attempted to RE-INVENT everything, to convince themselves (and any other gullible people) that it was THEY who invented language, dates, measures, standards, etc.

You can find the piece HERE…

But there is ONE thing they FELL DOWN on – “Alfa-Bravo-Charlie”.

In 1927, the International Telecommunication Union had formally adopted the Alfa-Bravo-Charlie phonetic alphabet. Its history went back even further, it having been jointly developed by the British and French. However, there were others (during WW1, the British Navy had gone with Apples-Butter-Charlie) – so the ITU decided that to avoid confusion, standardisation was required. Fine.

But in WW2, along came America, with their “Able-Baker-Charlie” – and for a while, the RAF used it.

However, THIS time, their attempt to impress their system on the World FAILED. NATO adopted Alfa-Bravo-Charlie; thus it became the official International Radiotelephony Spelling Alphabet – and is now the WORLD STANDARD.

Outside of the USA, Able-Baker-Charlie is DEAD.



…is erratic, inconsistent and HILARIOUSLY inept.

Case in point: In Asia, RTL/CBS have been promoting “Under The Dome” for the past two months. Adapted from a Stephen King book and co-produced by Spielberg, this epic finally premiered a few nights ago – and looks pretty good.

But I am sure I was not alone in noticing something was MISSING.

You see, in the PROMO (which has been shown every 15 minutes for those two months – about three THOUSAND times, in all) when a little Buddy Holly plane crashes into the dome, showering debris over the ground, said debris lands right next to two characters – and clearly includes a severed LEG.

The hero pushes this young guy out of the way, leaving them both sprawled on the ground – and the limb lands with a THUNK, right beside them.

However, when that bit came up on the premiere – the shot CUT to the next shot, just BEFORE the appearance of said LEG.

A MAJOR cock-up! A competent company would ensure that any cuts covered episodes AND promos.

But that is how it is, here in Thailand.

And do not get me started on the Pixies – the prats responsible for pixelising (not pixilating: that is a form of animation – or getting DRUNK) images deemed too daring for Thais.

Local channels pixelise guns/knives near heads, booze bottles, “intimate” human bits, homosexual kisses and cigarettes in mouths, among other things. While the Western channels that use the SAME platform – do NONE of those sillies.

Then again, while those same Western channels CUT all strong language, Western programmes shown on LOCAL channels have every F, MF, CS – and even C – left INTACT. (I will leave it to your sordid imagination to work out what the letters stand for).

It is a truism that in Thailand, bureaucraps do not DO anything – they just like to be SEEN to be doing something. And nowhere is that more evident than in their feeble efforts to CENSOR TV.


…is they missed a trick.

We’ve all seen them – two guys dressed in cheap plain black suits, with plain black ties and plain white shirts.

They knock on a door and when it opens, usually one of three things happens: if the occupant has them, he sets the dogs on them – or he slams the door in their faces – or gives one of them a sucker-punch and THEN slams the door in their faces.

Fair enough. But since the late Seventies, the JW boys have had a better option staring them in the face.

The thing is, their conventions require that they avoid ostentatious garb, etc. But that would hardly include plain, plastic-framed dark glasses – or black Trilby hats (do you see where I’m going with this?)

Yes indeed, we are talking about – THE BLUES BROTHERS!

The Blues Brothers

How cool would THAT be?

And while I’m on this, another thought occurs: maybe the Men In Black who allegedly turn up at incidents involving aliens – are just Jehovah’s Witnesses?

–     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –     –

I decide to “elevate” the following exchange from Comments…

You shouldn’t make light of these bastards. A friend of mine died because his Jehovah’s Witness wife wouldn’t let the medics give him a blood transfusion.

David Wright – December 23, 2013 at 8:59 am


Ah yes. The JWs’ famous misinterpretation of Leviticus 17:12 (or in America, probably 12:17) which was written WAY before the technology of blood transfusion existed and was clearly intended to cover cannibalism. I’m sure many others have died because of that.

Then again, the cancer of religion has been the cause of COUNTLESS deaths over the millennia – think of 9:11 (or more properly, 11:9) for a start. 3,000 died there. Plus umpteen terrorist bombings. And it’s not new – the Spanish Inquisition (which NO-ONE expected) did for at least ANOTHER 3,000. And who KNOWS how many perished during The Crusades?

But as Eric Idle reminds us in “The Life Of Brian”

Vincent – December 24, 2013 at 1:18 pm


…which is probably the longest title in these columns.

But it IS possible. Oh sure, many of the rip-offs are unavoidable, without breaking the law – and prison beckons those who do not appreciate this.

However, for those in the know, there are alternatives – and what is life without alternatives, eh?

So let us start with something that affects ALL of us, every week – the provisions shop.

All name-brand supermarkets have “loyalty” cards. And some offer credit. Needless to say, credit cards are an abomination that must be avoided at all cost. They are like mafia loan-sharks: all they want is for you to max out your credit – then they will collect their high-interest minimum payments from you for LIFE.

But even the ones that just offer “points” are to be avoided – said points amount to a saving of just one or two percent, while allowing the store to track your purchasing habits, for free.

Furthermore, the name-brand goods they sell will ensure you not only pay for the products – but their ADVERTISING costs as well.

Better by far to use one of the growing number of “no-frills” supermarkets – then experiment with their NON-name-brand lines, which typically retail for THIRTY percent less than those sold by the name-brand stores.

You will find most products to be comparable to the name-brand ones (ALL products are covered by the SAME manufacturing regs) and a few are often SUPERIOR.

Those which are INferior – do not purchase again. Simple.

Then if you are a smoker, there are ways to avoid the (literally) ONE THOUSAND PERCENT TAX imposed by many governments. If you live in New York – buy your cigarettes in bulk, in Virginia, where they are MUCH cheaper.

Being British, I know of no reason you cannot do this – I cannot imagine there are customs points at STATE borders.

And as far as Brits are concerned, FORGET hopping over the channel for cheap ciggies. Customs will be all OVER you on your return – and they are not much cheaper in France anyway.

No, go further afield – to the Algarve (Portugal). There, they retail for about ONE THIRD the price of British ciggies.

And under the Single European Agreement, you are entitled to bring back a CASE (that is 50 cartons, containing 500 packs – which is 10,000 cigarettes, 27 a day over a year) provided it is for your OWN USE. You will save about TWO GRAND a year per person – AND get a free holiday to boot.

The method is this: take a package “mid-week break” – then hire a car at the airport (remember – Portuguese drive on the WRONG side of the road) and on Day One, test-smoke some ciggies from a sample batch of their local brands – then order a case of the ones you like best.

Any decent tobacconist (they still have them in Portugal) will provide one within 48 hours (they will probably want a deposit – just make sure you get a receipt).

There is however one catch: while Customs rarely hassle those returning from Portugal, if you ARE stopped, in theory you are required to PROVE purchases are for your consumption.

In which case you could tell them they are welcome to have one of their officers follow you about for a year, while you SMOKE all 10,000 of your cigarettes – preferably an attractive one.

But probably better is to point out they are a FOREIGN brand which could only be sold on the black-market – and according to newspaper reports you have read, the selling price would be less than you PAID for them.

A tip for getting through Customs without HASSLE is hang around the baggage area, fiddling with your wallet or something – then when you see a BUNCH of people heading for the Customs hall, blend into the BACK of the bunch, keeping your eyes fixed on the back of the person in front.

Customs officers tend to look for those at the FRONT of a bunch who are unwise enough to make EYE-CONTACT with them. Of course, it goes without saying that this advice is intended for those who do NOT have contraband on them – I am not about to go into print with advice on how to SMUGGLE.

And while we are looking at the advantages of being European, CARS are often much cheaper when bought in EU countries. Thus Brits can often find the hassles of buying a full-RHD-UK-spec-and-warranty automobile (which can be lessened by working with an agency that specialises in such purchases) are more than compensated for by the massive SAVINGS involved.

This one is more obscure – but these days, more and more people are buying copier-scanners to link to their computers. These are VERY CHEAP – but you discover WHY, when you go to buy INK refills (and photographic paper) for them. The cartridges cost a FORTUNE and run out QUICKLY.

But again there is an alternative. From Korea comes “Only One” – a kit consisting of four bottles of ink (black, red, yellow and blue) with four syringes. Just drill small holes in the top of your cartridges and squirt away. The kit will cost you around a tenner ($16) – less than the cost of a single cartridge – and save you up to FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS (eight hundred bucks).

Oh, and to avoid paying a fortune for their shiny paper – use A4 and then encapsulate (laminate) your pictures. They will be more durable as well.

Next: if you can stand leaving the rest behind – obtain your dog or cat from a dog’s or cat’s home (animal shelter). Breeders charge a mint for “pedigree” animals (and do not even ASK what happens to their “rejects”) while muts are generally stronger and healthier (not to mention more grateful).

And then, a PLETHORA of cheap goodies can be had from Customs, government and military auctions. Cop-cars are RARELY driven like they are on TV. Mostly, cops just sit parked – or bumble around, pestering motorists. And to retain credibility, their cars HAVE to be well-maintained – and are thus good buys.

Anecdotally, a friend once bought two brand-new HUGE amplifiers at a Royal Navy surplus sale, that had been designed for ships’ PA’s. He then wired his record deck to them. The boxes they came in were so well built, he used them to house his speakers.

One time, during a party, the police arrived saying the neighbours had complained about the noise. Unremarkable, until you consider he lived on a FARM – and his neighbours were THREE MILES AWAY.

Finally, while supermarket chains often sell stuff for LESS than wholesalers (look particularly for “two-for-one” deals, which will eventually rotate past items YOU buy – then buy as many as you can consume before their use-by date) good deals can be found at cash-and-carries (wholesalers for convenience stores).

Now in Britain, these establishments will usually only sell to SHOP-KEEPERS or BUSINESSES, who have cards and accounts with them (here in Thailand, they don’t care). But this can be side-stepped if you get a rubber stamp for a ficticious business made up – then write your order in a duplicate book (both obtainable from any good stationers) stamp it and pay CASH.

Since you will have to include a ficticious VAT number, this may be illegal – but it WORKS (I understand).

The above are just a FEW of the ways a consumer can avoid doing what most do – GRUMBLE – then bend over and brace themselves.

Look around and you will doubtless find others.

And if they are LEGAL – please leave the details in the “comments” for this article…